Reborn in a Siheyuan, From the Start in the Eighties

In 1983, the protagonist offered Sha Zhu a salary of 1500. Sha Zhu sneered, "Two thousand!" The protagonist chuckled and said, "I'll give you a 10% share. Sha Zhu, you'll work for me!" First of all, did Sha Zhu even earn 100 a month in the cafeteria? Why give him so much? He'd be scrambling to pay 2000, let alone 1000, to put up a job ad in the newspaper. Anyone who didn't know better would think the protagonist had fallen in love with Sha Zhu's goddaughter.

Well, this book is basically a period drama disguised as a traditional courtyard house story. The protagonist is a quirky, eccentric, and overly dramatic man—clearly a scumbag. Those who prefer pure romance should proceed with caution. Also, if you're impatient, don't bother reading.

Is the female protagonist of this book Jia Zhangshi?

It's absurd that you paid He Yuzhu 2,000 yuan a month in 1983. You yourself said that in those days, ordinary workers only earned 30 or 40 yuan a month.

After reading this book, I feel it really has little to do with the courtyard house! After using Sha Zhu's connections to get close to the high-ranking leader, he just co-founded a restaurant with Sha Zhu. Then he made his own money, and it had nothing to do with the courtyard house anymore.

The biggest flaw is that it had to be associated with vampires. I could barely tolerate the filler words, but this was unbearable.

Don't use the guise of a courtyard house to write historical fiction. It's fine if you do, but you shouldn't let the Jia family benefit. Even a single grain of rice from them would be unpleasant, let alone 40 yuan a month. Courtyard houses are only for slaughter!

In 2000, I could eat my fill at a restaurant for 3 yuan. Your salary of 1500 yuan in 1983 is amazing!

I hope the author will reply to fewer comments, ignore the trolls, and focus on updating more. Those who started criticizing early on can't keep up; they think the book isn't to their taste. Conversely, those who have followed this far don't need much explanation. We're not incapable of reading or thinking; don't think we can't guess what you're going to write or what the foreshadowing means.

What's there to defend about this guy? If it's understandable to be an ingrate when unemployed, then is it also understandable to become a traitor out of fear of death, or a betrayer for a small amount of money?