
The Demon Swordsman of the Witcher World
猎魔人世界的魔剑士
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 763k Words
- Genre
- Western Fantasy
- Audience
- Male
- Subgenre
- Sword & Sorcery
- Updated
- 4y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
0Monthly votes
4.7kRecommends
9.6kFans
237Chapters
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
Readers also read
Panlong: the World First Opens, the Souls of the Four Series Mutate
Wizard: Starting from Immortality
I Unlocked the Extraordinary Craftsman Panel
This Adventurer Just Wants to Plant Trees
Never Walk Alone!
Beginning with Lord of the Rings
Start in the Middle Ages, on the Crusades
Daming: Have I Become Wanli's Portable Grandfather?
I Am Drawing a Hot-Blooded Episode in the Zhiyu Episode!
The Witcher: the Witching Notes of the School of the Wolf
Azeroth: I Have an Adventure Illustrated Book
West 1899: Wilderness Exorcist
In fact, when entering the world of witchers, the best situation is to become a noble and then learn magic. Many novelists write about becoming witchers. However, the upper limit of witchers is too low. A group can't beat a group of farmers, and a wizard can break his legs with a stick. In the end, no matter in which world, only mages are the most promising.
There is a problem... It is quite poisonous if we set the system to be intelligent and humane. There are countless various analyzes on this poisonous point There are also well-written systems that are humane and intelligent, but they give the system space and treat the system as a supporting role to flesh out the character. There is humanity and intelligence, but the image is still thin. At present, it seems that the system's role in character relationships is only to elicit two flirty remarks from the protagonist (actually it doesn't feel sexy), but who can't do this job? Do we have to rely on the system? Others are pretty good👍
I accidentally read the comment section and found out that you are struggling with those settings... In fact, the game is slightly different from the original novel. Friendly exchange with everyone! Answer a few questions: 1. The protagonist, the Magic Swordsman In the early stage, he mainly relies on swordsmanship, but later on, he will definitely focus on magic, and even use magic to strengthen his body. Magic is not a seal. I emphasize it again! When using magic, the protagonist can omit chanting and directly engrave the spell on the body, so it is as convenient to use as the seal, but stronger. The Magic Knights come from the Griffin School. Their seals are stronger than other schools, but they are still seals after all. In the past, there were no schools of thought. They all belonged to the Order of Demon Hunters led by mages. The purpose of this order was to create demon hunters to kill raging monsters. Due to the separation of the founder, the demon hunters gradually left with a bunch of people to form a school. So there used to be spellcasters in the Witcher School (in the beginning of the Green Grass Trial, the caster released a stabilizing spell to increase the success rate) Studying magic together in the Griffin School, we accumulated rich magical wealth. Because they refused to share their knowledge, other spellcasters summoned an avalanche to destroy them, and there were only a few left. 2. About The Witcher 1) Whether Trial of Green Grass downplays emotions depends on the person. For example, the Wolf faction values brotherhood. The Griffin School is committed to helping and saving people who are harmed by monsters to practice the way of knights, and also pays attention to the love of compatriots. For another example, the Bears are famous for being emotionally indifferent, but there are demon hunters like Gerd. He became friends with the lord of Skellig Island, and would take the initiative to help him clean up the monsters because of the lord's regret. Is this considered affectionate and righteous? 2) Was Geralt stabbed in the waist with a pitchfork Actually, yes. But it's not that he is weak, it's that he can't bear to see young people and can't do anything. He is too kind. Perhaps only when facing monsters can he exert his full strength. What's more, most of the demon hunter's skills are aimed at monsters. Knowledge and skills can be most effective when facing monsters. Demon hunters are considered to be the pinnacle of human warriors, but as long as humans still have their limits, after all, they are just human bodies. The most resilient and strong they are, but their reactions, poison resistance, insensitivity, etc. Are strengthened. If you stab them in the waist, they will definitely die! 3) Except for a few exceptions, demon hunters can only use very simple magic (using skills to mobilize the power of chaos in the air), and they have no magic power themselves! They have no magical abilities! Take Geralt as an example. He actually has magical ability, so his sigils can mutate. However, except for him, most demon hunters' sigils are limited to the limit no matter how proficient they are. It's just about the speed of casting spells, and the increase in intensity is really not as good as magic. First of all, it is irrational to confront spellcasters head-on. When they are prepared, defensive magics emerge in endlessly, and control magics can also limit the performance of warriors. The simplest way for a warrior to defeat a spell caster is to sneak attack him while he is slow to react (he can't finish reciting the spell). Most mages don't know how to train their bodies. They are so proud. Not to mention their willingness to learn melee combat skills, young people don't even know how to hold a staff. Wei Ye is a positive example. Although attack magic is difficult to attach to weapons, it can strengthen weapons. Hold a stick (staff) in your right hand and cast spells with your left hand. So it doesn't make much sense for you to argue about this issue. There are specialties in the art industry. Demon Hunter: Destroy monsters, be an assassin, and be a bodyguard. Spellcasters: research, war weapons, solving difficult and complicated diseases (what are they not doing, infertility, nobles like to find them) I have said so much, I just hope that everyone will not get angry because of these problems. If possible, this book will be based on my setting. Good night everyone.
I thought the protagonist would be a magic swordsman like in DND, or a mage with many spells, but he turned out to be a sword-playing mage. He is not proficient in sword skills, and his magic is sparse. Mages rely on their brains to make a living. They have to use swords and occasionally use spells, which is a bit disappointing. I have also played The Witcher 3. Although the upper limit of the growth of the witcher is low, the sigils still have their own uniqueness. As a mage, the protagonist has been taught by the witchers since he was a child and has not learned the sigils. It is outrageous and the writing feels wrong.
To be honest, how strong are witchers? In terms of spells, even the Griffin sect cannot compare with real mages. Physically, Geralt, who is a sword master, has been hammered by mages more than once or twice. In fact, the only ones who are really strong are the more outstanding ones from each sect. In fact, witchers have a longer lifespan, heal faster from injuries, are more tolerant to toxins, and have better physical fitness.
I have read Chapter 60. Having played The Witcher 1 and 2, I can barely understand it. After all, I only played the game with grenades to level up and didn't read much of the plot. I actually want to say that I didn't understand what the author wanted to express. It was indeed a very profound first-person perspective of the wizard, and then all kinds of tragedies were poisoned, which made me unable to watch anymore and I had to skip reading. Author, if you see Shouyi, please explain, what is the extremely abstract description of the protagonist leaving Therese before leaving to express? Go to bed? If so, you might as well express it in more obvious terms. I read that abstract description three times and still didn't understand it. If it hadn't been for this chapter, I still wouldn't have guessed it. What the hell is that mirror merchant? Too much character? Does devil investment only use money? Give me some treatment by the way? It's really just about money. I still don't understand the role of this character. Also, author, don't dig holes so frequently. Do you dig holes to match the tragedy and persuade them to retreat? It's really just a human tragedy novel, even games wouldn't dare to write it like this
The protagonist's most precious possession? That must be his virginity. If the benefits are great enough, spending a night with the Mirror Master is not unacceptable to us readers.
How should I put it? I haven't read a witcher novel for a long time since the last god-level witcher novel. It's a pity that the author of this beautiful witcher novel was tired of writing and finished it hastily. I hope the author of this book can write at least 2000 chapters 😃
Brother. Can we remove those unruly people in the game? Hacked to death in the article. Grateful
Trace
In my personal opinion, a protagonist whose strength is unclear and the reader knows nothing about him starts to follow the plot and it is difficult for people to immerse themselves in. A dry drunkard provokes trouble and slaps in the face, which makes it difficult for people to continue watching.
Triss... To be honest, this looks better than in the game.
I also read the book about The Witcher, but the ending was disgusting, and the setting of the protagonist was a bit unacceptable in the end.
Come on, I really want to see this. In the world of wizards, the power of demon hunters is too small. I think it is better to be a king.
I suggest the author to read "Godly Demon Hunter". I feel that the taste is not quite right. Besides, there are too many interactions with pets and I can't get nervous at all. Does the author love dogs that much?
I just saw it on the shelves, and I think it's okay. However, the early plot and scene switching are a bit messy, and the foreshadowing of the protagonist's life experience has not been withdrawn. His childhood memories, why he wandered outside, and he can also learn from Yennefer. Generally speaking, there is nothing major wrong with it. The author of the background setting is also very clear. Just treat it as a parallel world. I don't know how many female characters the author plans to include. Forget about Yennefer. The relationship between master and apprentice is quite good. The bond between Geralt and Yennefer is too deep. I have played the game several times and always chose Yennefer in the ending. The audience for Western fantasy is already small, and there are even fewer wizard fandoms. Come on, author.
Still about magic. See if this makes sense! I've written it but haven't posted it yet. If it doesn't make sense, I'll see if it makes sense and I can change it! 1. Is it reasonable to set offensive magic to attach to oneself and objects? This type of magic can cause harm to oneself. It has the same effect on yourself and your enemy. 2. Attack magic is set to specific element types, such as fire, thunder and lightning... 3. About magic and swordsmanship. Swordsmanship is just a matter of proficiency. Physical fitness alone will not produce sword energy or anything like that. Warlocks are very strong. When prepared, they put a shield on their body and start throwing magic randomly. However, if the shield is broken, it is difficult to quickly release the magic of the shield again. Therefore, if there is no time for warlocks to prepare, they can only release daily magic with low power, and destructive magic requires chanting and the like.
Discussions are welcome, I will try my best to write it down, the outline is a bit long. Maybe the writing is not very good.
After all, this is where readers and authors conflict. Because it is easy to cheat, readers will tend to read it after finishing it, while the author is prone to cheating because of his poor grades. It's better to have a senior author who has completed the novel. Someone like the author writing his first novel will definitely meet many people like me who are interested but worried about tj. Take myself as an example. I have read three wizard-themed books. I kept following the first one until it was updated. The second one was almost finished when I found it, so I didn't hesitate to follow it. The third one was read only after it was finished. So I personally read it only if I know how to fatten up the book. Keeping up with the update is likely to be a waste of money and feelings.
Instead of going to Doom, you can go to Silent Hill, Cabin in the Woods, Warhammer Subspace, or Devil May Cry. Anyway, you can kill demons and increase your combat power, just like Dante Devil May Cry.
Is it so bad? So this is why I like raising books
Didn't the author have news that there is a Bobcat School? I read in posts and Bilibili that it was said to be a resurgent school of thought from the remnants of the Cat School, and it has become even stronger since then. This is a second design that seems to be included in the official list. The Manticore School in the Desert is the second set that has been officially included.
😁
Will you go to Lao Gun 5? Best to go to the 10th anniversary edition
It took 3 days to catch up from the beginning to the end, but you ended up failing? Hehe
I saw a lot of prophecies about the main characters, various conspiracies, and a lot of mythical people. I didn't like it.
The writing is too vague, I don't know what I'm doing.
Let me complain, the main character is called Baldwin, but when describing, he always uses his identity, such as a wizard or something. The author is a novice and can understand, but please pay attention when writing books in the future! The switch of identity is often a kind of emphasis. For example, if the protagonist is called a wizard at a banquet, then this identity will definitely promote the following plot. If it is not strongly related to the character's next behavior, then it is best to call it by name.
If you want to earn a living from online novels, just write cool ones. Don't make any nonsense. Do you still think you are writing a masterpiece?
I have made a full order, and the author will let me know when I open a new secretary.