100 Ways to Save Civilization

How can one become a policeman without organization or discipline? Moreover, the sincerity shown by the male protagonist and the skills he displayed are completely like a boss-level figure. How can we treat a boss like this, and he has made great contributions to the country (early warning of earthquakes)? I seriously doubt this is a spy!

The heroine who is SB enough will persuade at least a third of the people to quit in the first few chapters.

I don't know why, but it looks so awkward, and it sounds like a translator. Then the character's personality feels weird, very much like that of the American emperor.

When writing a book, be sure to use your strengths and avoid your weaknesses. No offense intended, I'm afraid the author didn't choose science in high school. If you lack the most basic common sense, don't add too much ink to the details. Science fiction Science fiction, to put it bluntly, science is just the skin, fantasy is the soul. But if you want to follow the path of science fiction, you must be logically rigorous - and fool most readers. Otherwise, you might as well use settings and systems to replace things that you are unfamiliar with or even don't understand at all. There is no harm in borrowing settings from other novels, such as "The Three-Body Problem", as Easter eggs, but if you really want to borrow settings from them to write about civilized war, at least make the basic logical relationships clear. Ye Wenjie told Luo Ji two basic postulates, and went to Luo Ji to explain the laws of the dark forest to the great historian. In fact, the basic public facilities required are far more than those two. For example, striking is more economical than detecting. The explosion of technology makes it possible for the weak to surpass the strong on a cosmic scale. A big boss has analyzed these one by one and summarized eight basic principles in addition to the two postulates, and then we have the airtight Dark Forest Law. However, these eight items are not entirely added by readers to improve the setting. They are written explicitly or implicitly in the book. I dare not say that all the additional eight items are necessary, but if five or six of them are missing, the Dark Forest will be nothing more than a joke. This is where the difference lies. Logical flaws: 1. Coders are not equal to hackers; big guys with good programming can defeat everyone who is organized in the technical field... Well, you yourself have written that civilized war is fought at the technological level. When the generation difference is not obvious, it is caliber, range, computing power... How can individual computing power defeat the organization? ...Just think that the protagonist has received an unknown revelation, and it is a black technology in this area. 2. Controllable nuclear fusion. The level of technology in the book is actually similar to our reality. Do you know how a hydrogen bomb ignites? Use the atomic bomb. How does an atomic bomb ignite? The triggering device is usually TNT. Because only a nuclear explosion can reach the ignition temperature of fusion. As a person with certain knowledge, how did the protagonist get uranium at the beginning of the third round? "The hidden formula was derived..." Emmm, let's put it this way, for undergraduates in science and engineering, they can learn all the mathematical formulas and physical principles required for nuclear fusion and even atomic bombs. The difficulty in this aspect is actually just the specific process problem. If you don't understand it, what you can make with the materials will only be a "dirty bomb". For fusion, what is needed is not a formula, but a specific algorithm. Because under the conditions of limited computing power, only more effective algorithms can control the star-like power. Whether it is a tokamak, a stellarator, or temperature conduction, effective control of particles is achieved by solving partial differential equations using numerical methods. Unfortunately, when it comes to chaos, there is a limit to what computing can do. Every detail branch here has dozens of top experts and thousands of scientific research dogs working on it. On one side, it says that the power of an individual is limited, and on the other side, it says that the protagonist rubs the sun with his hands. It's not that it can't be done. If we want to write exciting stories, we should write well and don't stick to specific settings; if we want to focus on the light and distortion of human nature under changes such as the end of the world, we should write more characters, like group portraits; if we want to write science fiction that fools readers and is clear-cut, we should study a few books before writing. I can't stand it anymore just seeing my hands rubbing the sun. In my opinion, the setting of this book so far is a story about a cyclic system saving the world. This kind of book is difficult to write well. Movies from far away such as "Edge of Tomorrow", Tom Cruise's one; TV dramas such as "Zero"; a web drama that was popular some time ago, I forgot the name... Because it extremely tests logic. The excitement of this type of story, in my opinion, is a bit similar to a detective novel. The first few rounds are to show the audience the cards; the last round is naturally through strict logic, with the help of existing bad cards and certain intelligence advantages, ushering in a shocking reversal. The previous failure and depression were swept away, giving the audience a refreshing release and feeling. It is said to be similar to a detective novel because it is also about the author posing puzzles to the audience. "You have seen the first and second rounds. You basically know what cards are in hand. You have also figured out the general information of the enemy. How do you think the protagonist can change his fate against the will of heaven?" If the focus is not on this, it is not impossible. It's just that I think this loses the biggest advantage of the circulation system, interactivity. Interaction between author and reader. Otherwise, recycling this kind of cheat has no unique advantages compared with other cheats - at most it can arouse readers' sympathy for some past regrets. But other golden fingers can also have advantages: with system medicine, I can become a martial arts genius, a new star in scientific research, and a great artist; we are all ordinary people, and who doesn't have the dream of gaining both fame and wealth? On this basis, if a cyclical story can write about human nature, criticize social contradictions, and reflect on history vaguely, who dares to say that it is not a masterpiece with great depth? Finally, I am just an ordinary engineering student with little knowledge. I have only a superficial understanding of some of the ideas put forward in the article, but I personally feel that they are inappropriate and I am not happy about them. If anyone has any advice, I would welcome it. The author must have his own problems in his heart, and he can ignore such nonsense; if he is willing to sit down and discuss the truth, I would be extremely honored.

It's already 2022, why are there still so many dog ​​lickers?

I can't stand it anymore, it's such a licking, the early warning saved so many people, but the windows were broken and beaten, and after that, I didn't even show my attitude, and I still licked the woman.

I don't know why, but I always feel like I've seen it before and it seems familiar.

Can two-way foils and black hole bombs be produced by a second-level civilization? , The second-level civilization cannot do this no matter what angle it is, only the god-level civilization can do it in the Trisolaris, and the reborn super battleship can only be achieved by the seventh-level great civilization that can travel between river systems.

I don't understand that it has been tens of thousands of years since the Hydra organization came to the earth. Didn't they think of rebuilding a spaceship? There are still tens of thousands of years to build an interstellar civilization. Why is Hydra so useless?

Leave a comment🙂