The Witcher from the Sky

Have I seen this protagonist's name and routine in any Witcher book?

Just copying the strongest demon hunter in the world. Disgusting.

I'm asking for everyone's opinion on whether I should have a female protagonist. If there is a female protagonist, it will probably be a single female protagonist. If there is no female protagonist, maybe one or two women will be written about, but they will basically not occupy much space. The main reason is that I always feel that a normal man has some physical problems if he does not deal with the level of sexual desire. Of course! Whether there is a female protagonist or not, there is very little space about women. Mainly because I'm not very good at writing emotional scenes! ! ! Personally, I don't really want to write about a female protagonist, but I still want to ask for your opinions.

It is very similar to a novel. If it is a reference, then the author has successfully inherited the shortcomings of that novel (such as "smoking"), but the advantages have not been clearly inherited.

After reading Chapter 11, I couldn't help it. Each chapter is almost half a chapter about how the protagonist smokes! Is this about a witcher? Is this a fucking drug addict?😅

The protagonist will die without cigarettes, right? I really hate people who smoke. Not only do they harm others and themselves, they also have bad breath when they talk, and their teeth are extremely yellow.

After reading Chapter 87, I gave up. The writing was okay and the combat characterization was also good! But some of the basic logic makes me feel uncomfortable! First of all, there are ten nobles in total at the top. As a result, in Chapter 87 of Youcai, it is said that five of them will become dark races. The differences are racial, not national. The royal family and the great nobles all grew up eating rice fields together. So the protagonist's IQ is normal? ! Next is the lower level, where all homeless people eat people, or is it normal for homeless people to eat people? ! Uh 😓, how is this normal logic? Looking through the history of the East and West, even if it is the form of self-elimination of the elderly, there is no perversion of cannibalism, unless it is a catastrophe! It is recommended that the author adjust the outline so that the logic of the larger background environment becomes more normal!

The only bad thing about online writing is the innocence of plagiarism. Sooner or later, you will kill yourself.

If you have any comments, please leave them below.

This book refers to the completed Witcher At least the system is the same.

It can be seen that there are some references, but the legendary and epic feeling of that book is too strong. I hope the author can write that feeling without borrowing his plot.

This setting is simply speechless... All? Then why don't you just mess around?

Author, let me calculate for you a basic population of 1 billion. If all men go to participate in witcher training, there will be tens of thousands of people left after graduation. There are only 10,000 people who have just become official witchers. With a basic population of 1 billion, 10,000 witchers are not many. So, humanity itself will perish in a few years.

A nobleman who can be a politician must become a gangster boss. I don't understand. Aren't these people the dogs of noblemen? It's okay to have someone else do the dirty work. Isn't it shameful to end up doing it yourself?

I haven't seen the movie Van Helsing very often. Can the author write about more classic movies, such as The Exorcist and Constantine?

No one calls a .44 Pistol, they are all called a .44 Caliber/.44 Pistol

The protagonist Taicai is still so new. How much pressure does the author want to give the protagonist to be able to afford the price of being an enemy of the world?

As far as mortality is concerned, I don't think it's a problem if it's in a modern setting, but it's a big problem in ancient times. Most people in modern times have better choices. Instead of choosing a career with a high mortality rate, there must be more people choosing to try their luck at not encountering monsters. In ancient times, there was a country that unified the world, and the death rate was so high. I think the rulers of the world were not human beings. As a person who competes with monsters, with such an inefficient success rate, not to mention the internship period, how much can a person who has passed the internship period survive at the hands of an equivalent monster? So if you think about it this way, if you don't have a character with high combat power that can kill the monsters to death, why don't the monsters give you a demon hunter to kill them to extinction? Then your mortality rate is indeed low, almost 100%, and the monsters use the demon hunters trained by your family as whetstones for young races. I think it is reliable. Then, if the human side has high combat power, the monster side can only hide and kill the weak chicken in your internship period secretly. Then your mortality rate is ridiculously high. Why don't you, a demon hunter with high combat power, protect your little one? Hey, just let nature choose. The one who survives is the witcher, right? I think the background should be changed, and the human race is the one being pressed to the ground and rubbed. Either change the mortality rate to the elimination rate, and those that are eliminated are semi-finished products or failed products, and the last ones are those that die. This is much more reasonable. The background and the human race's combat power are really contradictory.

Lao Da, why don't you come back and write a book?