The Peaceful Martial Arts Game

No wonder it felt familiar; is this another story about equality for all? While the values ​​seem quite positive, it's impossible for everyone practicing martial arts to be equal. Martial arts training creates class distinctions, so how can everyone be equal? ​​Besides, I remember reading about martial arts training somewhere before; it was supposed to be about everyone becoming a dragon. The last book had a protagonist who was cold and aloof, like a robot. I dropped it.

Having read up to chapter 13, the subject matter is good, the writing is good in the beginning, and the protagonist is quite shrewd, but the protagonist's purpose is unclear. I don't understand what the protagonist wants to do. Become a king or ancestor? No! When the protagonist said he would give the first villain a 30-year prison sentence, I was speechless. What is that supposed to mean?

I dropped the old book when the protagonist started promoting equality for all in another world, so I don't know how this one is.

The more advanced the world, the less likely equality is. Those with the highest military strength live for tens of thousands of years, eliminating anyone who rebels, making it very easy to enter a peaceful era. The simplest example is demanding equality from Nuwa (the goddess of mythology).

Are there other people like me waiting for the update?

I just don't understand why the areas in these lord-themed novels are getting smaller and smaller. Building a so-called city that's only 600 square meters in size? And five meters thick? Does the author even understand math? 600 Square meters? That's the size of two apartment buildings? And they say it can hold 1000 people? What, two people per square meter?

Even in modern times, equality is impossible, yet you're trying to establish equality in martial arts. Do you think the strong will talk about equality with the weak? That's incredibly malicious.

The comments section is full of people clamoring that equality is impossible, which is quite funny. 1. Who says a society where individual power reigns supreme is necessarily a dog-eat-dog world? If such a society truly existed, it would depend solely on the will of the highest-ranking power holders. Such societies are often unstable. But you can't say it will necessarily be a dog-eat-dog world.

I read about ten chapters and all I saw were three words: empty rhetoric and grandiose. Social development has its inevitability; otherwise, why would ancient societies collapse after only three hundred years at most? Didn't the ancients learn from their experiences? Couldn't they see the flaws in their policies? Wasn't there simply no other way?

Has the author stopped writing because of all the criticism? There are so many trolls.