The Peaceful Martial Arts Game

No wonder it feels a bit familiar, there won't be another one where everyone is equal. Although I feel that my three views are very correct. But it shouldn't be possible for everyone who practices martial arts to be equal. When practicing martial arts, classes appear, so how can everyone be equal? And I remember reading about martial arts training in a book before. It should be said that everyone is like a dragon. In the previous book, the protagonist was as cold as a robot. As a result, it was abandoned.

I saw Chapter 13. The subject matter is good, the writing is good, and the city is high-end, but the purpose of the protagonist is not clear. I can't understand what the protagonist wants to do? Become a king and become an ancestor? No! The first wave of villains and protagonists said that they would give him 30 years in prison. I was speechless. What does this mean? Is this operation done deliberately to show off the depth? There is no arrogance, no murderous intent, no feeling of an old fox, but a bit funny, which directly overturns the character created previously.

I read an old book and gave it up when I saw that the protagonist was promoting equality for all in a different world. I don't know how this one will be.

The more advanced the world is, the less likely it is to be equal. People with the highest force value live tens of thousands of years, and they can kill anyone who rebels. It is very easy to enter a peaceful era. The most obvious example is that you demand that Nuwa be equal to you.

Is there anyone waiting for the update like me?

I just don't understand why the current lord text is smaller than the last one. Where to build a so-called city of 600 square meters? It's still five meters thick. Does the author have any idea about mathematics? 600 Square meters? An area the size of two residential buildings? Also said it can accommodate 1,000 people? What, two people per square meter?

There can be no equality in modern times. You want equality in martial arts. Will the strong negotiate equality with the weak? You are too poisonous.

There are a lot of people in the comment section who are clamoring that equality is impossible, which is quite funny. 1. Whoever stipulates that a society in which individual power is supreme must be one in which the jungle prevails. If such a society existed, it would depend only on the will of the possessor of the highest power. Often such a society is unstable. But you can't say that it will definitely be the law of the jungle. If the powerful people at the top identify with a fair and just society, then they will be a fair and just society. Nothing else. 2. If the underlying rule of this power society is a society in which those who are comfortable boil frogs in warm water, and those who strive will sooner or later become more powerful. So this society does not have a solid foundation of class. Because once the class is solidified, the consequence will be that the power of the rulers will decrease, and in the long run, they will inevitably be surpassed by the common people at the bottom. One or two civilians may be absorbed. But in the long run, the common people will inevitably surpass the mere ruling class. This is also the main logic of the author's previous book. In the final analysis, it all depends on the underlying setting of the power of the world. A world where mere mortals can accumulate resources and use force is precisely the most desperate world. However, the early Xianxia emphasized the flow of mind and nature. This type of social system was precisely the social system in which the master sect took the dominant form. The meaning behind it was that class cannot be solidified. The world settings of the author's books are generally somewhere between the two, requiring resources but also paying attention to character. The author's plug-in only represents an extreme value of the importance of xinxing, which is equivalent to accelerating the speed at which the common class surpasses the ruling class. Conflicts that may have gradually expanded over thousands of years are intensified and resolved in the protagonist's lifetime. 3. The diode brain cannot understand the above.

After reading about ten chapters, I saw three words: false and empty. Social development has its inevitability. Otherwise, why would the world collapse in ancient times at most three hundred years? Don't the ancients sum up their experience? Can't see the disadvantages of the policy? Isn't there no way? Even if the protagonist becomes the strongest, there is nothing you can do. Unless the protagonist is destroyed every few hundred years, the ideal can only be an ideal.

Was the author so scolded that he stopped writing? There are so many trolls