History Wolf

{"NickName":"The Wolf of History Department","UserId":323917589}Don't be cowardly and start arguing with the chat group next door. Let me help you calculate the results of your quarrel with him this time. He wrote more than ten articles against you for one or two articles of yours. In this way, if you confront him a few more times, he will not be able to bear it. Although this is not a win, it can barely be considered a tie, and you can still make money. Also, in order to exploit the author, fans in the chat group will support you and make money. Come on (ง •̀_•́)ง

Qin II is awesome

To be honest, as a history major, my blood boiled when I saw the introduction and preface of this book. I feel that there is a lack of novels like this in this era, which can clarify the source and refute those remarks that are difficult to explain in one sentence. However, maybe the expectations I had all of a sudden were too high. . . . . . The more I read, the more disappointed I become 😭😭 From the beginning, I began to have some doubts about the "Historical Records" and the position of Taishi Gong. Later, the protagonist has read the Twenty-Four Histories, but doesn't know the story of Yu? Can't wait to read the textbook? At the end, the protagonist has memorized the Twenty-Four Histories, and I can barely accept the cheating of the protagonist's academic master. But I have repeatedly said that there is a junior who can memorize the Twenty-Four Histories? Who is so awesome? The real master of history, Mr. Lu Simian, only read the Twenty-Four Histories 3-4 times in his life. This is already very impressive. Mr. Zhang Shunhui, the master's master, said that it took him ten years to read through the Twenty-Four Histories. A junior in college memorized the Twenty-Four Histories in four years? It's too fake. It feels like the author doesn't know much about the Twenty-Four Histories. . . . . . . I'm not really a scumbag who spent four years as an undergraduate, right? 😥😥 I'm a little disappointed.

Nice! Nice! The protagonist does not have a strong sense of pretentiousness and feels very comfortable. There is no system, and the male protagonist is a genius. This makes me feel that Chen Ai is different and more comfortable from those scornful male protagonists who are useless because of the system. The author's writing style is very good, and the narrative is very neat, without the feeling of being sloppy. It has a single female protagonist, but her presence is low. I want to see the emotional drama between the female protagonist and Chen Ai! As for poison points, I think there are very few. I think Xu Qiufeng is a poison point, and there should be no others. Reading the whole article, I feel very warm. Lao Wang, Zhang Ping, and Aili take good care of Chen Ai. There are no one-sided villains in the whole article (except for Chen Ai's uncle's family), and there are quite a lot of tears. Summary: A beautiful book!

This book "Lao Lang" particularly touched me. On the one hand, my undergraduate degree is in psychology and I have personally come into contact with children with autism, although most children are not like Yu Ren and Chen Ai. On the other hand, postgraduate history study experience. All gave me a double feeling of understanding this book. Perhaps the most important thing about a novel is to touch people at every point. I am very happy to see Chen Ai, who is autistic, gradually transforming under the care of his classmates, teachers and other people around him while studying history. Because it is difficult for children with autism to make such a change. It is recommended not to always ask Lao Lang for some professional knowledge. He is a novelist.

Just chapter 3 of Fattening Bar, waiting for it to be released

After reading this book, I remembered the book in the chat group. In the name of subverting history, it was distorted openly and wantonly. I was also drunk.

Here it comes again, "Li Shimin is a Hu, not a Han", this argument has appeared again. In addition, I am very curious, where in the historical materials or archaeological discoveries, there is a record that "Li Shimin claimed that he was not a Han". Is it really because I am ignorant?

Please forgive me, I'm really sad.

Great, the chat group has been closed, everyone is celebrating.

Ten Philosophers of the Net Temple Emperor Yang of the Sui Dynasty Transition of the Emperor of the Tang Dynasty King Zhou of the Shang Dynasty Wei Zhongxian God of War Guo Fengxiao House of Shu Han Emperor Ran Wei Emperor Chongzhen Li Hongzhang God of War Zhao Kuo Anything else to add

The format is as follows Name: Gargamel Occupation: Foreign student Hobby: History. Gender: Male

Well done author, I have long been dissatisfied with that book. I feel that the book has become obsessed with it. It boasts about Emperor Yang of Sui and Zhao Guangyi. Now it still says that Apocalypse is immortal and Ming Dynasty is immortal. Bah.

Old wolf. No matter what, you have to write it down to 810,000. The author of the chat group is so dissing you. You will tire him out. Let him update 100 chapters a day

Is it true that someone would use the book of a master of marketing accounts as a history book? No way? No way?

Went there for a spin, laughed to death, it was a rabble

Expert: According to historical records, King Zhou of Yin was dissolute and immoral, but this is not the case. Many of his crimes were brought out by the Zhou Dynasty to prove the legitimacy of its rule, and even more were smeared by literati of previous dynasties. His abilities are also very high. Although it has been smeared by others, archaeological discoveries are enough to prove that King Zhou's rule was the direct cause of the demise of the Shang Dynasty. Marketing account: There is one emperor throughout the ages, King Zhou of Yin, and there is no emperor after Emperor Xin! Expert:? ? ? ……………………………………………………………… Expert: Based on some archaeological discoveries and historical records of conflicts, we can think that Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty polished the history of the Xuanwumen Incident to a certain extent, but there is no doubt about his achievements. Marketing account: The history books after the Tang Dynasty are not trustworthy. The Zhenguan rule was changed by changing history. Li Shimin was a wise man, not even a Han Chinese. He lost power and humiliated the country and was a puppet emperor Expert:? ? ?

I was really convinced, so Lao Lang quoted something from a history book. A group of people demanded logic. What's the logic? History has already happened, and it is not a novel. How can you compare this? Read the book carefully. Lao Lang only wrote about Chen Ai's school experience and the knowledge he learned. He did not express his own opinions. Please be quiet for those who disturb the comment area.

I don't have basic historical knowledge. "Li Shimin incorporated the Yang family into the harem, and the title is still Princess Qi." It's so funny. This paragraph has some basic historical knowledge. If you haven't read this historical fact, you won't be able to say this kind of "theism", which completely exposes your history-illiteracy. It's really okay to just report it if you get slapped in the face.

{"NickName":"The Wolf of the History Department","UserId":323917589} Author, to be honest, your writing is good. I just want to say that you must not be cut off. Even if it is true, you must write 810,000 words. It will definitely work. I am optimistic about you. Come on💪💪

The evaluation of King Zhou is so ridiculous. Even great men recognized that King Zhou was a very capable person, but he made mistakes on some issues, and you are no longer capable. The great man has commented on many powerful figures in the history of the country. Is he talking nonsense? What you are saying is the truth, it's really ridiculous

The positioning of the two books is different. . . Don't understand why there's a quarrel? I never felt that this book was belittling that book 😰 The introduction of this book is very clear, a master of history + later archeology

It is suggested that the cover of this book should use Lao Lang's own photo.

I went into the group of emperors and read two chapters. I really laughed when I saw the debate between Shang Yang and Mencius. Mencius was still a child at that time, right? Another person who regards the Qin Empire as history

It's well written, but it's also very uninvolving. Anyway, as a history student, I feel there is a big discrepancy. In fact, many students in the history department do not study history voluntarily and have no interest in academic research, so most of them are half-dead during class. There is also very little interaction between teachers and classmates, because the questions the teacher asks are really retarded, and the answers seem to make him look retarded. Most of the teachers have specializations in their academic fields and the scope of their research is very narrow. In fact, they cannot teach general history. Most of the time, they can only focus on the core of their own research. I have a teacher who returned from studying in Japan. He is a close disciple of Michio Furukawa. He talks about the Kyoto School and shuts up about the changes in the Tang and Song Dynasties. As for me, I like recent Chinese history, but the teachers mostly focus on medieval times. Really helpless. The teaching methods of teachers are also very different. Some have to follow the text and tell it according to time, such as in a book; some have to select major issues of each era and then introduce the scholars' views, which is the academic context. The most outrageous thing I have ever seen is that the teacher only used his own thesis as the core and combined it with original documents. Of course, he talked very well. Also, for example, economic history and world history sometimes feel really boring, so I have no choice but to play with my mobile phone when I should, and read books when I should. And domestic world history is really bad! The teachers are really not very good. By the way, in fact, teachers who are good at giving lectures are really rare. What I say is good is not interesting, but the ability to tell valuable things. There are not many teachers. When the content of the lecture does not even exceed your knowledge reserve, you will be really desperate. All my roommates and I can do every day is scold the teacher and find fault with what he teaches (of course I don't disrespect them, but some of the lectures are really bad, and some of them have problems with their character and ability. The academic world is too dirty). In addition, there is also the problem of lectures, which have to be squeezed every time. Before the epidemic, I liked to go to Nanda, but now I can't go. In addition, there is also the pressure of homework and postgraduate entrance examinations, which is really beyond words. Maybe the college in the book is top-notch. Everyone there is talented and there are no problems like the ones I encountered. And the protagonist is a god, so a lot of anomalies can be explained. The author's idea can indeed simplify a lot of complex problems, and it can also be said to be an ingenuity. Also, the protagonist's assignment on Egyptian law is too unreasonable. It is impossible for an undergraduate without academic training to write what is described in the article, not even a genius. History requires accumulation and life experience, and academic ability requires training. According to Mr. Mao Haijian, historical research can only start at the age of forty. The golden age is the age of fifty or sixty, and you can continue to do it in your seventies or eighties. It would be possible if a doctoral traveler from another world had memorized his graduation thesis. Of course, the protagonist's homework only surprised the professor, not research, but it was too much. The academic research of modern history is not as focused on proposing new arguments as in modern times, but more on expressing the complexity of history. It pays attention to the source of materials and the rigor and rationality of the argumentation logic. The so-called "from the perspective of civil law" seems to me, who is obsessed with the academic study of Chinese history, to be inferior. In fact, it is to look at ancient history from the perspective of contemporary history. Not only can it not be ancient history, but it is just an appendix of my own ideological process based on ancient historical materials. Just like comparing Mozi to science and Mencius to democracy In addition, the professor's own preference for the views of his teachers is another matter. Whether or not he is optimistic about it is another matter. When many long-established professors see research by young scholars who have different views from their own, their first reaction is to refute and suppress them, in order to maintain their academic authority. My teacher personally said, "Those old gentlemen will say that your research looks good, but it is too absolute. Although my point of view may have some minor problems, it is generally good..." I'm going too far. In short, this plot is really unacceptable to me. It's true that there are very unhistorical things in books about history, which I find very disturbing. Purely personal opinion, don't comment if you don't like it. If you have different opinions, it's my fault.

Why don't you open your balls, buddy?

Let me ask a question, does this book cover anything about brackets? After all, Lao Lang said that he would write about it in the next book? Is this the book?

Old wolf, come on, you are having fun