Master of Aviation

I think writing about aerospace alone is too narrow. Without the cooperation of chips, optics, computers, materials, machine tools, machine tool tools, powder metallurgy, special steel, rubber, finance, can you fly into the sky? These industries are like the boards of water barrels. Don't look at the highest one but the lowest one. Even if one of them is missing, it won't work.

Obviously the author has no professional knowledge and just learned some aviation development history. The key descriptions are unclear, and they just wander around the outer surface. For example, this thing is very good, this thing he made is very good, Wang Sheng said yes, you said it was okay, everyone said yes, how it was good and how it was made, but it was brushed off in one stroke. There is it in the head, it is too empty.

The protagonist said yes, and then people from the state and government agencies also said yes. Has this design been studied and discussed? I haven't researched it yet. Can you just say yes? Do you have any brains? This design has not been modified or further communicated. Can it be put into production immediately without extensive testing? If you say yes directly and start production, then aren't the engineers, architects, and raw material engineers below human beings? Could it be, uh! Can the protagonist realize the entire aircraft from the drawings alone?

I read a few chapters, and the general content is: I wanted to build a plane, and then I successfully built a plane! Don't ask how, I just successfully built an airplane!

Full text, project establishment, first release, offline😓

This book and "Rebirth of an Aviation Power" are both written in a similar template, and the plot developments are all written in a running account.

Comment: Has the author considered developing a children's science fiction magazine? This seems to limit your upper limit. , refund your money!

Throughout the article, the leader is very happy, the pig's feet are very happy, nothing can be done without pig's feet, things are very advanced, things are too advanced, so and so is very proud. Do you want to be so slobbery? If this can continue to be serialized, I'm convinced.

The writing is a bit nonsense, just inventing an invention, then finalizing it, and then setting up a project? A hammer in the east and a stick in the west! What are they? ! If we say it's a cool article, it's not a cool article! I really don't understand what you're writing about.

Writing industrial novels shouldn't be fun like this, right? I won't talk about the basic principles, just briefly describe the technical indicators, and then the protagonist will say yes, and everyone will immediately agree? For example, the current 28 major bicycles can only use steel pipes for their bodies due to insufficient material performance, resulting in products that are too heavy and difficult to ride. It is also inconvenient to carry it up and down the stairs (the user is afraid of losing it and lives on the 88th floor (as a spoof)). Then I did some research and found that the people who responded all live in the city. They don't need to carry 200 kilograms of stuff, and they just ride alone. So, we will immediately develop lightweight folding bicycles for these people. The maximum load is 75 kg. It is made of aluminum and is also equipped with 14-inch small wheels. What? Due to the insufficient strength of the aluminum profiles, the life of the folded parts is insufficient. There are three steps to take. First, make steel folding and non-folding aluminum profiles to seize the market. Then immediately develop high-strength aluminum profiles. By the way, because foreign aluminum extruders are not sold to us, we will then develop an aluminum extruder. When others follow suit, I immediately switch to my high-strength aluminum profiles. Then export it to ugly countries and make a lot of money. What about you, the author? It's just that 28-inch bicycles work well. Let's develop folding bicycles, using 14-inch tires and aluminum profiles. Immediately, passers-by began to cheer and agreed. The question is, what's so good about it? Why do we need to develop folding bicycles? Why can't I use my 26 or 24-year-old bicycle without having to explain whether it's developed or not?