How Scary, the Chat Group Is Full of Ancient Big Shots

First of all, there is nothing in the first chapter. Secondly, the historical celebrities are written like idiots. Li Shimin was really shocked when the protagonist made casual remarks, and Zhuge Liang was shocked again. The co-authored protagonist is a person with the Shock Fruit ability. Tiantian is shocked. It is obviously just talk. What's more, Li Er is an emperor, and Zhuge Liang sent troops. How can Nanman not know what the protagonist said? What the protagonist said was too simple and too empty. If Mao didn't use it, just forget it. This is a novice novel.

I feel that this book has no common sense, and it is not that the historical level is insufficient. Shu itself has been developed for a long time. Since Li Bing and his son built the capital Jiangyan, it has become a land of abundance. Yizhou is not short of food at all. What it lacks is food roads. The problem he wants to solve is how Zhuge Liang can supply logistics while fighting bayonets on the front line. Besides, after you have completely developed Yizhou, Cao Cao will have restored the productivity of Guanzhong and Guandong and crushed Ji Han to pieces.

The writing is very good, the article is very fluent, and the emotions are very delicately portrayed. I gave it one star because I haven't read the book yet and it made the author realize that life is impermanent.

When I saw the title of the book, my idea was: through the life experiences of a group of ancient bosses, I would help the protagonist make suggestions and help him grow up from a little loser. After opening the book, the author's thoughts: Modern people are better than people who read! The ancestors are all two hundred and five! Any idea I have can break the past and present and change history. After closing the book, the reader's thoughts: Am I the fool who reads this book, or is the person who wrote this book a fool?

Chapters 47 and 48 made me feel sick about the evaluation of national integrity, arrogance of scholars and Wen Tianxiang.

Subversion has the same problem as this book. The subject matter itself has problems. The way of indoctrination is too direct and too unobjective. This kind of novel is very brainwashing. The author is not a teacher. Does he have the right to spread his own three views like this?

It's ridiculous for someone who doesn't understand history to write historical articles.

Any junior high school student who has passed one of the subjects of geography, history, and mathematics cannot write such a bad article! I just want to ask the author, where did he come up with the nine-word policy to persuade Zhuge Liang at the beginning?

If you don't understand history at all, don't write a historical article. You can't stand the first chapter. How can Shu compete with Wei in terms of national strength? In the later period of Wei, Wei stopped attacking Shu and just dragged you along.

This kind of novel is basically the author's understanding of history.