I'm an Archaeologist Five Thousand Years in the Future

I subscribed just to say a few words. Brother, let's bring some common sense. This is a future urban science and technology article, not fantasy. I can't stand it after seeing the great voyage. Anyone who has studied in junior high school knows that the area will not change so much in 5000 years. It is impossible in 50000 years. Suppose such a big change occurs, all living things on the earth will perish. Such a big change in 5000 years will be accompanied by endless earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanic eruptions. Would a civilization that enters the interstellar era in the future not understand? Or are you saying that your novel is for people who have never been to junior high school? Moreover, it is very annoying to set up a fan to speak. I hope the author will read what he wrote.

"Are you coding on Labor Day?" "Who is the serious person to code!" "Are you coding?" "I don't code, are you coding?" "Who codes on holiday?" "What is coded?" "Despicable!"

After watching it for so long, I discovered a question. Assuming that the protagonist prevented the destruction of the earth five thousand years ago, why was the earth destroyed five thousand years later? From the moment the earth is destroyed five thousand years later, the protagonist's action of saving the earth cannot be realized. If it is achieved, then why is the earth learned through the future destroyed? Therefore, the protagonist's action of saving the earth is doomed to fail. Therefore, I suggest you, the author, define the world five thousand years later as a parallel world, and define five thousand years ago and five thousand years later as two worlds. The world five thousand years later is not the world where the protagonist lives.

This is your excuse for breaking up. 🕺🕺🕺If you had to do it all over again, 🕺🕺🕺 would you love me? 🕺🕺🕺Love makes people happy, 🕺🕺🕺 can also bring torture , 🕺🕺🕺I once walked through the legendary love river with you, 🕺🕺🕺 has been drowned in my tears, 🕺🕺🕺 turned into a painful love river, this is your excuse to break up, 🕺🕺​

I don't know if the author can see it or not. First of all, the author wants to develop in both directions, using the future to feed back the modern era, and deliberately reminding civilizational faults to highlight the time difference. This is okay, but often this kind of behind-the-scenes flow is to push the modern era forward, and then correct history. If the protagonist's world and the future world are the same world, then when the protagonist has the system, is the end of the world a continuation of world A or before? If it was before, how could the apocalypse happen? If it was after, then the system must be man-made. This is why novels of this type are pushed forward, because it is easy to collapse later. If the author can see it, I hope he can think about it carefully

A new book by a newcomer that I find a little pity. The main content is that the protagonist suffers from ALS at the beginning, and his life has entered a countdown of several years. At this time, he obtained a system that allowed him to enter the live broadcast platform 5000 years later. The setting of the novel is that there will be a cultural gap in the future, and the protagonist becomes an archaeological expert five thousand years later, and broadcasts live broadcasts to introduce to future people what the items of the "ancients" are and what their uses are. At the same time, the protagonist can exchange future creations from the system to the present, start live broadcast evaluation or directly use them himself. For this book, I feel that "originally" its creativity is really good and attractive. First of all, after briefly looking at the title and introduction of the book, I initially thought that the protagonist traveled directly to 5,000 years later and became an archaeological expert in the future world, introducing the true face of "antiquities" and "cultural relics" to future people. After I clicked in, I was a little confused at first, eh? It turns out it's just a live broadcast room** five thousand years in the future... (Looking at the introduction again, it turns out that I really saw it wrong hhh) The live broadcast room is just a live broadcast room. Anyway, what I expect to see is that experts talk nonsense about various daily necessities in a serious manner, and make all kinds of weird archaeological explanations, and then the protagonist slaps the experts with facts and personal demonstrations to introduce the true uses of these "antiques" to future generations. During this period, what I hope to see is the laughter of the experts when explaining and the slap in the face of the protagonist. But the question arises, why don't the experts find it funny at all when they explain it? Why does the slap-in-the-face plot seem tasteless? I have rewatched it several times, and after thinking about it carefully, I think this is a problem that these so-called experts in the future are too "child's play". Shouldn't future university professors and experts study the principles involved in archeology in detail before publishing the results? The experts in the current book only look at the appearance and then rely entirely on guessing. So who are you? ? ? Just take a guess based on the appearance, I am also an expert... What readers expect to see is "a slight difference makes a huge difference". After careful study, the experts introduce the research results in a serious and professional manner, and then come up with some weird answers because of the cultural gap. In this case, the slap in the face of the protagonist later will be more "flavorful". This should be the correct way to open up the fun and excitement of this book... At the same time, the novel uses a dual line of real-life short videos + future archaeological live broadcasts, and there are also branch lines such as connecting to treasure appraisal. The two-line plot is too difficult to control, and the author's writing style is not particularly good, resulting in both sides being a little dull and unreliable. I feel that the author can completely return to the subject matter itself, focus on future live broadcasts, correct expert fallacies, and create laughter, without adding so many messy elements. These elements will weaken the characteristics of the future expert subject matter itself. I would recommend this book to friends who are not so particular about the content. It may not be suitable for friends who have certain logical and rigorous requirements for the content.

Yes, it is great that the author can write this book by himself. Whether it is the rich settings or some information, it is still very interesting to read. Especially the photos of soldiers in doomsday scenes have a strong atmosphere of wasteland war. Just ignore some minor flaws. After all, people are not omnipotent, so why ask too much.

I really liked this book at first, but then it became boring after writing too much about the future, which was all about brainless slaps in the face. I feel that modern writing that is more brainless and slaps in the face and less is also about future humans. Their IQs are written so low. Every time, the future people discover something or the protagonist publishes something and is brainlessly suppressed. Then the protagonist does not fight back. The Internet is not optimistic, and then slaps him in the face. And then the public opinion on the Internet keeps repeating these things. Every time something happens, I will know what to write in the next ten chapters. I hope the author knows what to write. Less routine and more heart.

This book is a standard cool white text. It should be said that the author's original idea is quite good. This idea of ​​guiding the truth of modern human history 5000 years later is enough to attract people to at least read the updated nodes written by the author. It's a pity that the author wasted this creativity on a slap-in-the-face piece of writing.

After reading this kind of book, the author won't be embarrassed anyway, but I will be embarrassed.