The Mudslide in the Entertainment Industry

No matter how bad a movie is, some people will like it, no matter how good the movie is, some people won't like it. Why should a film critic say whether a movie is good or bad? Isn't this an expert nowadays?

If you say that your novel is an allusion to Mr. Wong Kar-Wai, or you simply have an opinion about the movie The Ferryman, you are no different from the audience you are criticizing. First of all, there is something wrong with Mr. Wong Kar-wai in terms of his character, and this has nothing to do with his film attainments. And from a technical point of view, Baidu is an unsuccessful commercial film. He intended to achieve both box office and word-of-mouth success, but all failed. This is not a good-looking movie, but it is not a bad movie. It is an above-passing movie, and it is not a movie that is incomprehensible or impossible to watch. Compared to Mr. Wong Kar-wai's reputation, this movie intended for the commercial market may have a bad reputation. You can watch it, it's not an excellent film, but it's definitely not a bad film. Then let's discuss the matter, Wang Chuanjun. Not a hero. Film work is a legitimate and profitable job. It has certain artistic appreciation and humanistic value. This is a job, and his behavior is very popular among his colleagues in the same entertainment industry, and even among his higher-level eldest brothers. It is not correct, nor can it be said to be wrong. But it was clearly inappropriate for the job. When you enter this industry, you rely on him to make a living. First of all, you are a nobody, you are not worth mentioning. You have the right to say no, but other big brothers also have the right to hate, you say no. If you don't give eldest brother face, why should eldest brother give you face? He didn't mean that you have to be high-minded when making and watching movies. This is something from the 1960s and 1970s. Let's talk about love apartments again, the feelings of a generation, whether they are childhood memories or not. Did he participate in the show? Um. He was in the entertainment industry back then. It was nothing but his movie, which he regarded as bad, that made him famous. He has acted in 4 movies, which can be said to be based on Love Apartment. Only then did the public know Wang Chuanjun. Now you are not satisfied, and feel that the bonus given to him by the iPartment cannot satisfy his higher pursuit and higher interests. He said he was an actor, what's wrong? Aren't the other actors who filmed Love Apartment actors? Is what they pursue unreasonable or illegal? What is the purpose of being an actor? Please the audience. The essence of the entertainment industry is to please the public, and I am addicted to interpreting thousands of different experiences in life. Now that he is well-known, iPartment will no longer be filmed. Let me ask, he violated industry rules, demolished his elder brother, and slapped the company in the face. Brother can't be angry, the company can't be angry, why should we be angry? Who gave him the face? Why should my brother and the company forgive me and say that you slapped me in the face well? Let me be clear about one thing first. It's not a bad movie, it's just not outstanding enough. It's not worthy of Wong Kar-Wai's reputation. That doesn't mean you can't watch it. Is this against your conscience? Is this against principle? Do you think you deserve every money you earn? I say this to all the big names in showbiz. Just what Yang Ying said, he thought he was worth 100 million, what is the difference between Wang Chuanjun's behavior and this? He thinks that he is an actor. Are others not actors? Don't people have any sense of aesthetics? People no longer have artistic pursuits. Everyone was drunk and he was alone awake. Then who is he? Mr. Wang's Baidu Man is not a bad movie. You can say he doesn't look good, but you can't say he can't look good. Does every director, every actor, and every film they act in have to be excellent works? Who stipulated it? Wang Chuanjun, can he guarantee that every one of his works and every role is excellent and outstanding? Finally, let me ask you, the author. You think your vision is very high, you defend Wang Chuanjun, and you think Wong Kar-wai is not worthy of his reputation. In fact, you and the so-called viewers who have been deceived are at the same level. You are not superior. Please be a little bit more confident. I don't like Mr. Wang. He relies on facts. He works in the film and television industry, and this is his job. His job is secure. Wang Chuanjun has no one to ruin his job. I hope some of his actions are correct. Please consider the individual impact on the public. In addition to the artistic pursuits that you think are important, every film and television company needs to make a profit. Movies are not art, they are commodities. This is the most basic thing, even if you don't understand it, it has certain artistic and humanistic value. The operation is similar to that of playing a game show. It cannot be used as a meal. It is these profit-seeking companies that you look down on, the value they create through commercial means. Everyone in every aspect of a film or television drama is important, and it is not decided by a certain director or actor. Everyone is a screw, and no one can live without the other. Whether it's movies, TV shows or novels. There are things you don't understand. If you evaluate them this way, others will also evaluate you. Not everything is more advanced with newer times. The new generation of film and television workers, except for 3D special effects, still lack kung fu.

I am getting more and more disappointed It seems to me that the author has fallen into a strange circle Pretending to be tough and stepping on people, and being criticized by more famous people; Pretending to be tough and stepping on people, and being criticized by more famous people; Pretending to be tough and stepping on people, being criticized by more famous people; Aesthetic fatigue; otherwise it would not advance the plot, right?

If you don't call the police when you are murdered, you always have nine lives? Logic failure, 886

After reading about 20 pictures, I couldn't stand it anymore. I was kicked out at the beginning. Not reporting to the police was a poisonous point. It was an attempted murder. The heroine is still a huge blockage. She appeared too much. Are you a female channel?

This book is so poisonous, it makes me feel disgusted, and I won't be at peace if I don't complain about it!

Very good work. I read 400 chapters in less than an hour.

The recent chapters about being a copycat are quite toxic. Alas, to be honest, the protagonists of entertainment novels have more or less been copycats, but this novel gave me a particularly strong feeling. Perhaps it is because the protagonist of this book has a moral high ground. If An Xin is a film critic, there is no problem. This is what he does. This is professional ethics, but if you become a screenwriter, it will be different. It's like a gourmet serving as a judge for an "Original Food Competition". After tasting a few original dishes, he felt they were too rubbish. Then he went on to cook the dishes himself, and then won the first place with an original recipe he copied from someone else. Neither the chef nor the judges participating in the competition knew it was someone else's. Praise this gourmet who won the first place. After this gourmet won the first place, he kept mocking the chefs and judges who participated in the competition. This is bad and that is rubbish. As an audience, I know that this dish is not his own original creation, but someone else's. You can imagine how disgusting I am. I have already copied several songs from Xiao Zhan's "Light Spot". , There is no originality at all, and the result is that it is still the world's number one single sales. At that time, it was almost disgusting As I said, if you are a film critic, it doesn't matter how venomous you are or how you ridicule trash scripts. This is your profession. If you can not be affected by various external factors, call him trash. It is a kind of professional ethics. Reflection, but if you end up working as a screenwriter, you still use good scripts copied from previous lives and screened by the audience to mock the original scripts that others have worked so hard to create.

The first two chapters are too awkward It's extremely blunt. Who hasn't seen a bad movie? I can't stand it anymore and turn my head to watch beautiful celebrities chatting up each other. It's great. It's okay to sleep. It's so popular. Even if it is based on the background set by the author, the protagonist must offend the entertainment industry and be banned. You can let your ex make idiotic remarks, and then the protagonist can travel through time after offending others. Even if you want to show the protagonist's "independence" and love for movies, you should be more normal. At least don't take the initiative to raise your hand to speak. Instead, you will be forced to speak if you are drawn. The protagonist does not want to say something against his will and remains silent. It's harsh. If mild criticism is not allowed, silence will be considered ulterior motives. If silence is no longer allowed, insufficient praise will be a crime. If only one voice is allowed to exist, then the only voice that exists is a lie."

The author should change the point of pushing people at the crossroads. It's so easy to give up when you're about to take action. You don't know if the other person is willing to do it.