The Art World Conqueror

Is your book belittling soldiers? Anyone with normal values ​​wouldn't write something like that.

Your values ​​are a bit off; how can heroes stand in that situation?

After reading the synopsis, I felt like the author might be a Confucian scholar from ancient times who traveled back in time. Literature can actually determine the territory of a nation! No wonder so many upright officials in ancient times discriminated against military generals!

Sorry, I haven't read this book. The title shocked me... "Master of Arts"? Are you planning to ascend the throne? Establish a country within a country?

What a bunch of idiots! They think they're so great just because they copied a couple of lousy poems and songs? Look at the consequences of underestimating soldiers—just look at that weak Song Dynasty. They're supposedly culturally strong, right? Why didn't they reclaim the Sixteen Prefectures of Yan and Yun? Scholars are useless! Besides, your protagonist isn't even a scholar; he's just a plagiarist.

Art is supreme? If the protagonist were someone who excelled at weaponry, they would directly rule the world.

I can't stand these values. I'd spit on them before I leave. Ugh!

Damn, this kind of writing about war and territorial disputes is disgusting.

The line between good and bad art is not clear. It is highly unreasonable to use human judgments of good and bad as the standard for determining the outcome of a war. Personal preferences play too big a role. This is a huge bug. What is an artist? If all your peers are dead, then you'll naturally become an artist.

I haven't decided yet. I've read dozens of chapters and I don't know what to say. I was initially drawn in by the subject matter. But what I saw was... A war between two countries is actually a war of words, and not the Confucian or Taoist kind I imagined—just a few people composing poems. Is this a joke? Even a group brawl would be better than this literary war.