
Tang Dynasty: My Servant Is Li Shimin
大唐我的下人是李世民
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 975k Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Jin-Sui-Tang Dynasties
- Updated
- 5y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
334Chapters
0Votes
5.6kRecs
44kFans
Tags
Synopsis
More by this author
In booklists 1
Readers also read
My Father Is Wen Tianxiang, and We Win the Battle of Yashan from the Start
Daming: Asking for the Throne at the Beginning, Lao Zhule Went Crazy
My Only Method: I Will Add More Points to Become Stronger at the End of Ming Dynasty
A Guide to Building Civilization in a Primitive Tribe
Sky Screen: I Show Little Sizi Around the Modern World, Shaking All the Dynasties
From the Start, Destined to Be Torn Apart by Tang Taizong's Horses
An Engineering Nerd in the Tang Dynasty
An Ancient-Era Farmstay: Welcoming Liu, Guan, and Zhang from the Start
Great Tang: Slacking Off in the Imperial Kitchen, Exposed by Sizi
I'm Really Bad at Top Lane
League of Legends: You Call This Getting Carried?
Why Am I Still Taking Disciples When I'm This Talented?
Great Qin: The First Emperor Eavesdrops on My Thoughts About Rebellion
This Crown Prince Does Not Want to Ascend the Throne
Reader comments 35
Google Translate






If you have 50 likes, create a book club to avoid embarrassment when no one comes in. Start today with full firepower! ! ! Q group number: 819060329 (really fifty...)
Question: Why are there more and more Li Chui? Answer: If you label anyone who has said something nice about Li Er as Li Chui, aren't there more and more Li Chui? Question: How does Li Chui play Li Er? Answer: They told everything Li Er did
I've probably read too much of Li Shimin's street-stall literature. I just want to ask you, are conspiracy books more authoritative than modern-verified history books? Not to mention that history is written by the victors. Li Shimin has been dead for more than a thousand years, and no one has ever denied his achievements. Why? Are you the only one who has a lot of trouble? Are you better than Song Taizu and Yuan Taizu? As the future victors, why can't they discredit Li Shimin to emphasize their legitimacy? Because there is nothing black to say, why do you impose things on others that don't exist in the first place? Li Shimin's evaluation in his later years was very correct. His merits outweigh his faults, and he will be an eternal wise king.
I think the author can read the novel "This Is the Emperor's Chat Group", which was subverted. Li Shimin was scolded so badly in it 😁 The author can let the protagonist give suggestions to Li Shimin in the future so that he can make changes. I think there are many things in it that you can learn from to improve this book.
Full of positive energy, it makes you happy to read and comfortable to read. Come on, fire up your engine. Already followed, looking forward to updates.
Li Shimin changed history. Historians during the Wu Zetian period recorded the time when history was changed. The unearthed epitaph of Tang Jian proves that Li Yuan was the initiator of the uprising. The Book of Tang records that Li Shimin was the initiator. From this conflict and the historian's record, Li Shimin changed history. The historian community has basically determined that Li Shimin changed history. The unearthed epitaph of Pei Ji. There is also no record of Pei Ji launching an uprising in his biography. If the Tang Book records things that are not recorded in Pei Ji's epitaph, That cannot directly prove that Li Shimin changed history. The epitaph of Tang Jian tells us who the initiator of the uprising was. That's very clear. It was initiated by Li Yuan. And this conflicts with the records in the Tang Dynasty. So the historical community has concluded that Li Shimin changed history. What is controversial is not whether Li Shimin changed history. But how much has been changed. Changed those. Most historians believe that Li Yuan was discredited. Discredit Yang Guang. Li Jiancheng. The Xuanwu Gate Incident was a rebellion carefully planned by Li Shimin. It is not a passive counterattack and self-defense. There is some information that can be speculated on. But the evidence is indeed insufficient. This can only be surmised. Change those histories. One can only speculate. Not enough evidence. Therefore, the historical community hates Li Shimin. He caused great difficulties for future generations to study history. After he changed history and was proven. His subsequent history. The credibility of history books has been greatly reduced. All history must be re-studied.
Actually, it's not that locusts can't be eaten, but that swarms of locusts can't be eaten. Wasn't there a locust plague in Africa some time ago? The livestock didn't eat it. It seems to be that as long as they swarm, they will secrete something, which is poisonous if eaten.
I want to establish the Qin Ancestral Dragon worship belief in the Tang Dynasty ✓
The Great Qin Navy has been around for hundreds of millions of years!
By the way, what achievements did Li Shimin, who was praised as the emperor of the ages, have? Qin Shihuang destroyed the six kingdoms. The books were written in the same text and the carriages were in the same track. For the first time, the land of China had the concept of unification of the world. Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty destroyed the Xiongnu, pacified the Western Regions, expanded the territory, and forged the soul of the Han Dynasty. Taizu of the Ming Dynasty drove out the Tartars and restored our Chinese clothes. Where is Li Shimin?
Hmm... Could you please stop talking about the chat group and talk about what is written in the history books? Even Chairman Mao thought Li Shimin was a wise man. Chairman Mao was a famous politician, writer and historian.