The Power of One Country

Overall, the book was good, but it was not in the same direction as what I wanted to read. It lacks an epic sense of a whole country doing something big, and is more like the promotion of ideas.

Those who travel through time have the power of a whole country. This type of article The first thing I read was the kidnapping of all mankind, which is shocking! Then I read about the whole country developing a different world. The author started by turning the country into a think tank. Compared with other cool articles, system = library = think tank. But he also set limits for this plug-in, 5 minutes of call time. Later, I felt it was not enough, so I added a text message function. In fact, I still don't understand the specific instructions of this text message or even picture function, such as drawings, maximum area limit? Input delivery with sight? Can it be micro-engraved? Let's not mention this for now. What the author expresses is to change the aristocratic class, even to break it. But what I find more uncomfortable is 1. The protagonist's personality changes a bit quickly. The setting is that of an ordinary college student. He talks on the phone for 5 minutes at the beginning, listens to the opinions of the think tank, and then handles many things perfectly. I did not see the necessity of a think tank. For example, the protagonist in "Kidnapping All Humanity", who made the decision to kill for the first time from an ordinary person, still remembers that he almost bumped into a knife edge, stood on tiptoes, made a strange posture, and asked for help, and all mankind shouted "Kill him!". The change in human mentality is very natural and reasonable. In this article, although it is also described that the first murderous protagonist only said a few words to himself, even if it changed, it was too fast. 2. The flaws of pig's feet are basically not seen so far. Since it is a good novel, there must be low points, such as failure to remember and follow the suggestions of the think tank, or even the regrets caused by the protagonist's own unnecessary operations! No! The protagonist can do well without a brain trust. 3. As a nobleman, breaking the aristocratic system. This specific example should be our great chairman. It's very similar, but the tragic events of the people around him constantly stimulate the protagonist's ideas one by one, allowing the protagonist to actively develop dissatisfaction with the system. This process is also very weak. The siblings, brothers, housekeeper, old man, and phantom wolf all mentioned the poor living conditions, but there were not enough details. This point can be referred to the description of the supporting role in "Mercenary World". 3. The think tank's opinions are just an outline. What can be said during a 5-minute phone call? It's just an outline. Just like in reality, if I tell you in 5 minutes the basic operations of financial management and fitness, you can make money? Can you lose weight and become a muscular man? But Pig's Feet took care of everything through a 5-minute phone call, including practicing, studying, and dealing with so many things. This point feels too fake to me. The setting of "Kidnapping All Humanity" is that you have a whole day to come back, adjust your mentality, and even arrange the dota education bureau, parents' arrangements, national glory, and let the protagonist's heart belong to the details of our world. Continuing like this, the protagonist has formed a bond with people from another world. When the two worlds conflict, which side does the protagonist stand on? 4. The technological advancement of other worlds is currently very insufficient. Although some modern management methods have been added to the military forces, it seems that after a round of movable type printing, newspapers came out. Now that the newspaper is out, the bookstall, the description of the newsboy changing the fate of the orphan? What about the guidance operation of newspapers and public opinion? Always use face-to-face theory with the enemy? We have recruited more than 10,000 people. We don't want to buy food that has tripled in price. We still don't grow potatoes? Why don't you take the lead by making some potato pasta? The enemy's IQ has been reduced to this level. It requires an army and an army, public opinion and newspapers, assassinations and force. I don't know why there are still those nobles. The number of words is water, it can be a wave, like "Once upon a time there was a sword and spirit mountain". Once this kind of red thought comes out, the whole kingdom is flat, without the protagonist taking action, all the subordinates of the nobles can stand up and become their own masters. Summary: 1. It is speculated that follow-up plug-ins will be strengthened. 2. I'm afraid the new map is still the same as the old map. The bookshelf is reserved for now.

Many people are very puzzled by the protagonist's behavior of not wanting to be served, not wanting to be called master, etc. I will give a unified answer here. The theme of this book is anti-aristocratic, that is, the protagonist wants to eliminate the aristocracy. While eliminating nobles, do not become nobles. What is the core of this book? It is clearly written at the end of Chapter 12, which is to break the aristocratic class and achieve relative equality The protagonist's behavioral logic is based on this. I'm curious. Why do many people think that the protagonist should be superior to others, and superiority to talents is the ultimate pursuit. While shouting to break the oppressor, I want to become the oppressor at the same time. Take this for granted. If the protagonist's behavioral logic is really the same as that of a noble, to form a monopoly and bully others, then why is he fighting? This book is a cool novel. The protagonist will also pretend to slap in the face, but the pretending to slap in the face is based on reasonable behavioral logic. Not all pussy should be faked, and not all faces should be slapped. To quote "Zhang Mazi", fairness, fairness, is the fairness of the stars. ...... Let me add a few words about equality and fairness. Fairness has fair opportunities and fair results. Some people ask if it is fair to work hard and get the same money as others. This refers to the fairness of the results. It can even be extended to the problem of on-demand allocation. Fairness in this book roughly refers to fairness of opportunity, that is, everyone will have the opportunity to create a better future through hard work. Equality includes relative equality and absolute equality. People are different and have differences, so we must maintain basic human rights, such as equality in life safety. Don't use extreme and extreme examples to refute the whole. There is not a single sentence in the whole article that is absolute. One final word. The background of this book is similar to the Victorian era. Do you know the concept of inequality in it? People are commodities! Many people don't understand. I will add something in the end. What is the pursuit of equality? It is because of inequality that we pursue equality. Also, what motivates ZB and makes people work hard and make money is differentiation, not class. Differences can be smoothed away, but class inequality cannot be smoothed away. … It's not clear why the subject of this book has caused so much controversy. Isn't it normal for the protagonist in a novel to change the world? The protagonist of this book just changes the world without becoming a person in this world. While defeating the oppressor, do not become the oppressor. This is the most common and normal concept! I can't figure out what's wrong.

Do you think I am the only one who posts book reviews in the book review section? Actually, I am the only one who rewards. Do you think I'm the only one giving rewards? In fact, most of the collections are robots. Do you think most of the collections are robots? Actually, many of the recommendation votes are issued by me myself. Do you think no one sprayed me? Actually, I deleted all the comments that criticized me.

I haven't read the book, but the author's thoughts on fairness and justice are very good. Those who say it's impossible all the time, kneel down when they see an official, cannot afford to go to school, cannot afford to eat, and work like slaves, is this the life they want?

The protagonist wants to eliminate the nobility and achieve equality for everyone. The problem is that if you eliminate the nobility, you will be the aristocrat, and your subordinates will be the minor nobility. This cannot be changed. Anyone who understands understands it.

I really like it, I hope more people can watch it

What can you do in five minutes? Study technology? Come on, compulsory education takes nine years. Five minutes is enough to make a fool of yourself.

People have traveled through time and are still so useless. Now it's the country that begs you, not you. If the country wants to punish you, it must be able to punish you.

This kind of article is not that easy to write. The author's own IQ is the sum of the IQs of all the people in the work. He wants to write a think tank with the power of the whole country, emmm.

This kind of book is difficult to write. If the author does not have a large amount of knowledge reserves and rich experience, what he writes is completely self-indulgent.

After reading the introduction, I will ask 1. Can the protagonist go back? Or was he very powerful in the original world, so he would still listen to him even if he had traveled through time and could not return to the country? 2. Can the protagonist mail back things from this world? (Such as elixirs, spiritual stones, magic stones, etc.) 3. Can the magic and martial arts in this world (that's what they are like anyway) be used in the original world? . . . In short, if the protagonist becomes stronger in this world, what benefits can it bring to the original world? It can make the whole country of the original world help him.

The author's writing is very good, and the story is also good. Why doesn't anyone read it?

Some people say that the pace is slow. If which chapter or part is slow, please mark it in this post.

Leave a comment as to where you found this book. APP ranking, web page recommendation, or search for book titles.

Five minutes of communication is too short, and it's not like we haven't made phone calls before. How much can you say in five minutes? So when I see that so much content can be communicated in five minutes in the article, it feels too ridiculous. I suggest the author increase the time, maybe 15 minutes or 30 minutes.

This book must be eunuch. The dialogue is stilted. Also, the author, please don't delete my comments, okay? Aren't you happy to put forward some opinions?

After the murder, her conscience condemned her for a while, and the common girl dared to speak to the nobles as equals. It's not a matter of nitpicking. You do whatever you want in any era. One moment you're a nobleman, and the next moment you're an equal to a commoner you've known for less than a day.

The character of the protagonist written by the author is very appealing to me, but I am also worried about whether the author can grasp the true "power of a country." And according to the author, the ultimate goal of the protagonist should be to eliminate the oppression of this era and create an environment with fair opportunities. This involves many aspects, and coupled with the development of the earth, it is even more difficult to grasp. If the author really writes it well, it is not an exaggeration to say that one book can be regarded as a god, but if it is not written well... In short, I still hope that the author can grasp such a big pattern.

It feels inconsistent. If you don't develop the value of potatoes in the past, you don't want to stand out. You will shoot the first bird and don't break away from the collective. Later, I don't want to be served, so I want to change my title and want to be equal. Isn't this being unique and breaking away from the collective?

I was just thinking, if the country has no interests, why should we help him?

Is the author releasing a new book? Is this book finished? !

This book is almost on the shelves, first order, first order, first order.

Various tasks for new book investment are about to be completed. Investment is sure to make money! Collections, recommendation votes, chapter comments... I repeat the important things.

The writing in Goldfinger is very innovative and well-written, but it doesn't look cool enough and doesn't suit my taste.

Why was it suddenly finished? I still want to keep it for a few more days.

Overall well written! Come on!

Come on, fast forward to Chapter 800 of the Global Red Revolution

More than sixty chapters later, we are still doing those bullshit things, and the protagonist's advantage as a person with a background has hardly been reflected.

The new book is finished. Do you want to write a sequel to this one?