Really Immortal

Suddenly I remembered General Feng Yong, the eldest son of the warlord Feng Delin. He believed that the main reason for China's internal and external troubles was industrial backwardness. "To rejuvenate the country through industry, we must first cultivate talents." Therefore, Feng Yong took out almost all of the Feng family's property and founded Feng Yong University in Shenyang at his own expense on August 8, 1927, which was founded during the Anti-Japanese War. He did not teach his students to run away when resisting invasion, but to fight bravely. After the school was occupied and destroyed by the invaders, he continued to preside over the affairs of Fengyong University. On November 1, 1931, the Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army of Fengyong University was sworn in and established. On January 28, 1932, the Shanghai-Shanghai Anti-Japanese War started. Feng Yong, the exiled Anti-Japanese Volunteer Army of Feng Yong University, went to Shanghai to participate in position propaganda and rescue work. In early 1933, the Japanese army attacked Jehol Province, and Feng Yong led his students to Chengde to participate in the anti-Japanese war. I don't say whether the protagonist wants to do this, but he can't teach students to do that. Everyone wants to run away, so who will move forward? Even in the book Big Brother, did the protagonist just avoid and run away? Did he run away when the enemy attacked the mountain gate? There are some things you don't have to do, but you can't laugh at them

"Eight thousand of my warriors have been sacrificed. The enemy's offensive has not declined, and the future is uncertain. If the position exists, I will come to see you. If the position is lost, I will die on the battlefield. I will die on the battlefield. As a famous anti-Japanese general, when you pass Wusongkou by ship, if there are waves like mountains, then I am here to see you."——Guo Rugui

The protagonist is not stable at all. Consider all possible dangers. Be prepared for danger. When the earth is facing a locust invasion. It's too unstable to not improve yourself. Strength must also be improved in the rear area. You can't even protect yourself. Talk about stability.

Feelings after reading the first chapter 1 Some people stick to one or two sentences, as if they have grabbed the author's sore feet, or reported it, or pointed out the book review section, as if standing on the moral high ground and angrily criticizing others, demonstrating their lofty morality and selfless justice. Everyone who knows what you are doing will understand. 2 If Roth's point of view represents the author's point of view, then Wei Changlin's point of view is also the author's point of view. Why do you only talk about the bad things and not the good ones? 3 It's not scary to be led along, but to attack the author is too much. It doesn't mean that you have read too many novels. You can also read other books without thinking. This is a novel, not an argumentative essay, and the characters' views do not represent the author's views. Besides, the author did not expressly support Roth's views in the article. 4 If you don't like it, you can click away. There is no need to make the book review area a mess. The author's share of writing a book is usually based on the starting point's rewards and subscriptions. Do you know that you are ruining people's financial opportunities? If you like to comment so much, you can go to other free prostitution websites to comment.

I just watched five or six pictures at the beginning, but I couldn't stand it anymore and felt uncomfortable.

I have read some chapters. To be honest, the writing style of this book is quite good. In terms of plot, if you can endure the first few chapters, it can still be considered a good book. The first few chapters mainly have the following poisonous points: 1. An old man who is so sickly that he would be hired as the principal is the biggest unreasonableness 2. When a classmate who had been copying the classics for three years stood up and said he wanted to be passionate when he graduated, then why did you go there earlier? 3. The principal's graduation speech has extremely unfair views. The whole article tells students not to fight enemies of the same level, but only to bully those who are better than themselves. Only the last paragraph, which talks about the need for strategic passion, makes sense, and the following chapters say that the Zerg are extremely powerful and can eat dirt, and humans cannot defeat them at all. . . 4. After the graduation ceremony, after a while, you went to the Education Bureau to get resources to improve food and help students keep fit. What do you want to do in a logistics school? The key is that they gave it back, and this is the most ridiculous thing. No matter how you explain it, there is a contradiction on one side This is where the early stage is quite toxic, and there are some details. If you don't think about it carefully, you won't feel it, so I won't go into details. The main thing is that it gets better later and I still feel like I can still see it. The key is to get through the front.

It's fully booked, but can the update be more powerful? This book is very suitable for old people like me to read. The most important thing is that the writing is stable. As long as the writing is good, I will keep pursuing it

The writing is getting worse and worse, there are too many loopholes. The preface does not need to be followed by the following text. One: Body and Systems. This is considered a vulnerability and is too hard. This point cannot be written well, and the system needs to be written all the time, which is too contradictory. Two: The time of spiritual existence. What I wrote before is that it consumes very little and can live very long. Now it turns out that I can only live for a period of time, and I also wrote about Shinto in the middle. Later, I don't know why I can live for thousands of years. Three: The true God, the false God, and Lot are so special and contradictory that the author may not even be able to tell them apart. The one I mentioned earlier is Lot, who is different from others. Later it became true that as long as the spirit is strong enough, one is considered a true god. (It's just short of igniting the divine fire) Four: The strength of the ancient spiritual body is obviously very powerful, and it should be very powerful. Later, in order to let Lot defeat him, there was also a hunting god organization that could kill gods. Just weaken it. The middle process is too far-fetched. Five: There are many other loopholes that are not particularly big, so I won't list them all. Remarks: I really liked this book, but it had a lot of loopholes, so I didn't bother with it at first. After all, I like it. But later on, the loopholes became more and more numerous and bigger. The update is so slow, I really can't stand it.

It's so funny, reading a novel in the middle of the night, is this all Sanjiang?

I haven't watched it yet, but it looks very noisy and lively.

Everyone in the comment section now is full of talented people. His brain circuit is clear and his speech is pleasant. I really like watching these trolls. Talking about the book, this book is a hodgepodge, and the whole world view is a bit vague. How long it can be written depends on the author's mood. I just felt that the plot progressed a bit too fast, the excavator dug holes clearly, and the branching plot was a bit arrogant. I saved it on my bookshelf first to see how it develops. I'm quite looking forward to the follow-up. It just depends on whether the author can resist the trolls. I don't know much about this author, so I'll first read the author's previous books and get to know them better before reviewing.

A person's longevity does not mean that he has to start a family. At least he needs to know some wonderful women so that he will not live in this world.

He easily killed a second-level female insect single-handedly. After the killing, he was not arrogant and kept calm. There is no danger in the word "stable". It is unreasonable to develop the protagonist in this way. Therefore, developing the protagonist according to the normal story will definitely go through hardships, and it is still a matter of life and death. No matter how stable you are, it is useless. Of course, the protagonist will not die, and even if he dies, he will come back to life.

Can't the author update twice a day without putting it on the shelves? If the update stops on a certain day, can I send a small note asking for leave?

This protagonist's outlook is extremely incorrect! As a principal, when human beings are facing foreign enemies, I am teaching students the so-called "steadiness" and teaching them to escape! In his speech, he openly mocked those who shed their blood for mankind as stupid! Do you call this "stable"? Your spine has been broken!

As an invulnerable boss, I could resist it before, but when it came to the system, I really couldn't resist it. Countless people are fighting for you on the front line, and you can easily become the savior, but because you don't want to lose the so-called preciousness, you turn a blind eye to the countless people who have sacrificed their lives for you, and continue to be stable at the back. The most important thing is that if you don't bind it, forget it. The article actually mentions that if your life is in danger, you will choose to bind the system. This is true selfishness reaching its limit. Even racial crises are not as important as personal lives.

Without these "idiots", who would give you time to stabilize? If the frontline soldiers were "smart people". "General, the enemy has arrived at the front line" "It's a fool to fight even though you know you can't defeat it. You have to keep the green hills and don't worry about running out of firewood, so you can retreat to the next base." "The enemy continues to pursue you, general." . . "General, there is a city behind us" "Withdraw" "General, we are the only ones left" "We still can't fight, in order to preserve the fire of mankind, I decided to surrender" In the end, all the fools died, and the smart people survived. Many years later, the general found a note in a certain human ruins "It's just a little bit close. As long as the frontline soldiers delay for a while, it will be..." The general smiled and shook his head, "It's a fool to fight when you know you can't beat me. I won't be a fool"

The novel is based on a funny theory. —I can't teach students martial arts, because if they have the ability, they will be drafted to fight locusts. ? ? ? I will not say whether you should stand up when the country is in crisis. After all, this is a personal choice and there are differences in division of labor. But when the nest is overturned, are there any eggs left? Everyone's health is improving, but alien creatures are coming to attack. Is this something that the government and the army can handle? This is a disaster facing all mankind. In this situation, those who know martial arts at least have some ability to protect themselves and can protect their loved ones, but what about those who don't know martial arts? How did the author establish this kind of sandbox point of view and still be so complacent? Recently many novels are based on Shen Yong's animation, but Shen Yong's caution is because he was too reckless in his previous life, so he will be cautious and prepared in this life. Being cautious is for protection and to destroy the enemy, not for the sake of being wise and protecting oneself. The little Japan you often make fun of all has such correct views. What about you authors? Bah!

After reading the final summary of the first chapter, there is one thing that really makes me unhappy! Teach others not to fight the Zerg of the same level, but to avoid it and kill the Zerg of a lower level than you. However, if you don't stop the Zerg at the same level as you, who will? Ah? Someone one level below you? Or do you let people of the same level as you risk their own lives to fight one against two? Yes, after you avoid the Zerg at the same level as you, you can kill a hundred Zerg that are one level lower than you. But have you ever thought that because you avoided the Zerg of the same level, it can also kill a hundred humans one level lower than it? Isn't this still one life for one? Why don't you block the Zerg of the same level and fight back while retreating to the defense line, relying on your position to fight? In the final analysis, it is not about teaching people to be selfish. Even if it means sacrificing fellow humans, they must save their own lives in order to enjoy fame and fortune. Because there will be other people on the front line who don't care about their own safety and want to protect others even if they die. Because they are full of passion and are not afraid of strong enemies. They will fight with the same level, and even fight across levels if necessary, just to protect those who have no fighting power in the rear, or just delay the progress of the Zerg to gain time for the rear to arrange arrangements.

This book is boring to read. I have had the system for more than 60 years and still haven't figured out anything. I worry about it all day long. I also worry about being bound to the system and becoming someone else's puppet. Is it so popular nowadays to write characters where the protagonist is afraid of death? If it sounds good, it means being steady, but if it sounds bad, it means that I am afraid of death. I worry about myself getting into an accident every day.

After retreating, the Stable Character Classic has come out. Even if it belongs to a new style of writing, it is still wrong. And as an immortal, after watching "Senior Brother" and "Zhou Dongdong (Three Bowls)", I really have no desire to continue watching. The writing is indeed okay, but the plot... True thoughts, don't criticize!

I originally wanted to join the army, and I also wanted to protect my family and my country, just like the revolutionary martyrs learned from me. However, after reading this book by the author, even though I haven't finished it, the first two chapters have already blown my mind. I now have some doubts about life. According to the author's theory, Regardless of whether when the United States comes and we feel that we can't fight, we can be more cautious and surrender directly, or if we find that the fire is too big and dangerous, we can be more cautious and let the fire burn down. If we rush to put out the fire, we are stupid and unsound, right? I hope the author can help answer my doubts. Thank you. I will read a few chapters later to understand the author's thoughts in depth and then come back to ask questions. Thank you. If you disturb the author or anyone in the book review area, please inform me to delete the post. I will first say sorry to everyone.

The author thinks that war is just a fight between gangsters? Soldiers can retreat freely, but they also run for decades before fighting again? Do they have brains? The author thinks that it is a competition between two people? If they can't beat it, they have to practice for ten years before competing again? How funny? If the protagonist did this, his student would not even see the sun the next day, and he would be shot by the supervising team. There are also people who use roundabout ways to win with smaller casualties, and so on. Isn't this nonsense? What does tactics and strategy have to do with your soldiers? This is what commanders and generals should do. A soldier's duty is to do his job. Even if the Jade Emperor wants to attack you, you must rush forward. You still run away, you still find low-level people to fight, you still find people to surround you, and you have to practice for decades more? Are you the aggressor on the other side, or are you the aggressor? Are you not clear about your identity? You are the one being invaded, and only the aggressor can retreat when they want, and surround them when they want. The protagonist's public remarks will never see the light of day. Without orders from superiors, soldiers will fight to the death without retreating. The protagonist's remarks make it sound like he is playing a game. If you can't beat it, then level up and try again? How ridiculous. Is this a great god? Practice that sentence for decades before you come back. What an ignorant person can say that.

I read the comments section before reading this book. After all, I don't have the right to speak without research on the novel I'm reading. So I read it. First of all, the word "stable" is mentioned. The character of the protagonist is stable, but how the author describes it, the driving, the building, and the airplane part, it is really crazy. I was a little persuaded to quit this part. This is not stable, it is really sick. As for the question mentioned in the comment area, what the author actually wants to express is to act steadily and kill the enemy! But what is the real situation? The protagonist is so afraid of death and has never been on the battlefield. Why should he call those passionate people stupid? You really think that others are brainless and just rush forward. Don't others know how to conserve their strength to kill the enemy? In fact, what the protagonist said is right, but you are wrong in that you have not considered that the spirit of fighting the enemy bravely is needed on the battlefield. This spirit is needed, but you did not say it out and include all the martyrs who sacrificed their lives for the country. That's why people get trolled. In an era where I have the strength but my body and mind are still young and have not adapted to this era, it is really disappointing and this is also a big shortcoming. Having said so much, if you have overlooked these points, you can also read it.

After reading Chapter 22, my personal opinion is that after the protagonist discovers that he is immortal, he probably has a delusion of forced victimization, so he can be cowardly. Who can be truly selfless? You can say that the protagonist is very selfish, but the protagonist has arranged a young identity, and it is estimated that he will stand up in the future. After all, standing up as an older person is a bit untenable and can easily cause trouble. Without the ancestors who died generously, where would we descendants be? It cannot be said that there is no point in dying. No one wants to give it away in vain, but there is no way. The author probably means that people of the same level should fight against people of the same level, but sometimes it happens that someone with a higher level than you comes to beat you, and the one behind you is more ordinary. Do you want to fight or not? What matters at this time is personal consciousness. The protagonist shouldn't be too cowardly. After all, it's a novel. It's okay to be like this in reality. After all, no one knows. If the novel is still like this, it will be criticized by others. In fact, don't deny that others have to make selfless sacrifices. There are so many things. If you sacrifice yourself to make your descendants happy, no matter if it is for free or not, you are still a hero. After all, people have stood up, and the frontline resistance is no worse than the rearline research. There is nothing to compare. Personally, I still think the frontline is greater. After all, it is the sacrifice of life. The world is full of ordinary people at most, and you will still be ordinary people if you stand up.

This author should have been able to talk to Wang Jingwei very well after he traveled back in time to the Republic of China. After all, they both have the same ideas.

It's normal to be trolled in the first chapter. Some people never understand that as a celebrity, you can't cause bad influence in public, and the same goes for celebrities, because they will affect many people and affect the social atmosphere. What society should promote must be truth, goodness and beauty. Even so, there are many dark sides. Those who take the lead in making troubles are not acceptable even if they do not break the law.

Don't wash it off, this book has incorrect views, so report it

Take a look at the first chapter. What the author means is to run when you encounter someone who is stronger than yourself, run when you encounter someone of the same level, and then fight when you encounter someone who is lower than yourself. Personally speaking, there is no problem, but the problem is that he is a principal. If everyone is like this, retreat is the greeting gift for practitioners of our generation? Everyone on both sides, let the other party show his realm, and we retreat, home? No more, the enemy is too scary! Wait until I come back after practicing for 180 years, and won't there be a tall person to support me? Anyway, I'm weak, so I have to stay behind and do the logistics.

I found that the author couldn't tell the difference between funny and disgusting. Some plots may be funny to you, but disgusting to readers.