Confucianism and Taoism

To be honest, I watched it for Confucianism, but the more I looked at it, the more divergent it was from my ideas. I couldn't understand the idea of ​​not killing at all. Confucius could kill with a sword, but the protagonist always emphasized not to be a Confucian, but his behavior was a mess... Cultivating oneself, regulating one's family, and governing the world, I only saw self-cultivation... This kind of protagonist has the skin of Confucianism, the flesh of Buddhism, and the bones of Taoism.

This book was okay at the beginning, with a bit of a scholar-xiao flavor, but it changed in the second copy. There are three poisonous points. The first is the setting of not killing people. Confucius was born in the war period of the Spring and Autumn Period. He traveled around the world, would he not kill people? In troubled times, people can kill people just for a bite of food. Does the protagonist feel that Confucius's virtue is lacking? Besides, the six arts of a gentleman include riding and shooting, and a gentleman is equipped with a sword. The second poisonous point is to establish one's body and establish one's words. The article always emphasizes the unity of spiritual realm and knowledge and action. So here is the question. Confucianism has always been centered on self-cultivation, family order, country governance, and world peace. Let's not talk about family affairs. It is past the point of the protagonist running around the world whether to get married, but what about governing the country? In Swordsman and Dragon Swordsman, he could have helped the peasants live a good life in the court, but he was selfish and had the nerve to say that he was a real scholar, while others were rotten Confucians. "The poor are good at themselves, and the rich are helping the world." Let's understand. The third one is too lazy to talk about.

The protagonist has problems. 1. Don't kill. I just want to know, from beginning to end, it is about whether to kill people, but is there any book that says that Confucianism cannot kill people? Can you become a sage without killing people? It is obvious that whether one kills someone or not has nothing to do with the saint. 2. In the early stage, the Four Books and Five Classics were somewhat related to Confucianism, but obviously in the middle and later stages, they were forcibly related to Confucianism. Without the classics as a basis, it would be empty and weak, and the core of the protagonist would already lack a soul. 3. When the protagonist is slapped in the face by outsiders, he always responds with a smile, "Well, no matter what happens, I just won't kill you." It's funny, Murong Bo already bullied your disciple, but he didn't teach him a lesson, he just waved it off and ignored him. Is this the atmosphere that highlights the protagonist? I think even if Xunzi comes, he will teach you a lesson. This is obviously not the way a normal person thinks. I think as a normal person, if someone slaps you in the face, you will definitely be taught a lesson, otherwise it will turn the world upside down. Is there anyone who would be indifferent to being slapped in the face? ? ? You are really not angry! 4. Karma. If virtue is not matched, disaster will surely follow. There is nothing wrong with this sentence, but the protagonist obviously has the ability to solve the problem immediately, but he still naturally waits for disaster. Are you a big-hearted? Just ask him and that's it. This is very similar to point 3. 5. I don't know much about this cultivation system. Although I travel through different worlds, it feels like there is no upper limit for the protagonist. He can reach the top of the world casually. I don't want any opportunities from heaven, materials, and earth! As long as I improve my mental skills, I will be invincible! Are you a bug? Or Xiuer?

This book is so frustrating to read. Holy Mother, she has no national spirit and writes about Buddhism under the banner of Confucianism.

If you have incorrect views, you are a hypocrite! It's full of poison, don't look at it!

Preaching is useless, the soft bones are the couch for traitors. The Manchus and Qing Dynasties were all slaves, and the Yuan, Mongols and Han were just beasts. To be honest, I am very disappointed. Not only is this book no improvement, it is not as good as the previous one. At least the protagonist of the previous book is still the same person in my opinion.

Spicy Chicken Spicy Chicken. Confucianism and Taoism, but there is nothing that makes people feel gentle, elegant, and elegant. Gods, I can't read the astronomical texts as happily as they should be.

Toxic... Extremely poisonous. If a modern person notices that he is a modern person, and he is also a college student, he will talk and act like an ancient scholar who has never left home. He seems to have no sense of empathy at all and is very embarrassed.

After reading it, it's really rare to see a protagonist who shouts that he wants to cultivate his mind and work hard The protagonist pretends to be very shallow and exaggerated. He has lived through four worlds. It's amazing that the author can arrange for the protagonist to never die under his subordinates. The protagonist's IQ is touching, and so is the supporting character's. Basically, whenever the protagonist encounters anything, I always pretend to be cool and defeat the villain. This villain is too harmonious. Already resisting Japan, the protagonist also said that I want to cultivate my mind and I will not kill people. The author is so talented 👍👍 He is so poisonous

After reading a few chapters, the author really persuaded me to quit. The first chapter had a ridiculous plot, which was really embarrassing, so I won't talk about it later. I don't think I'm smart enough. I said in the comment section that I'm not a troll.

After reading this book, I have three words: poisonous, poisonous. What nonsense? ? ? ?

If you can't write well, read more. It's terrible to write a book without education. You can't even understand the basics and still pretend to understand. I've never seen such a sloppy protagonist. He didn't learn Confucianism well and then went to study psychology. Do you think you are awesome? Wang Yangming didn't even dare to do anything.

I rarely write book reviews, but this one gave me a different feeling. It's rare that I want to read the second book after reading it. In this book, I read the author's attitude towards life and the author's insights. I feel that what I read is the author's ideal attitude towards life. Although it is a web text, the principles in the book are not web texts. Unite knowledge and action, and stick to your heart. The author should have some experience and insights. In my humble opinion, please don't spray.

The further you go, the more ridiculous it gets. I feel like the protagonist is always pretending, which feels very unrealistic and a bit unrealistic when written. However, the online novel is fun to read, as long as you can slap him in the face and pretend to be cool.

The second one: Goodbye

What's going on with those polished comments above? It's so damn good, I couldn't stand it after reading two chapters. It's written with a donkey's head and a horse's mouth.

I have read the free chapters What do you say about this book? Obviously the author wants to add private goods I don't really have any objections to the Confucian setting In fact, whether it is to talk about general principles or spread ideas As long as it is positive and uplifting, I don't think there is any problem But I think the author has put the cart before the horse First of all, you are writing a novel First write the novel itself well before you can consider the issue of adding private goods Many times the description is too deliberate Too blunt The image of the protagonist is too thin and cannot stand To put it simply, it lacks style The setting of not killing can be said to be the Virgin There is nothing wrong with the Virgin, it is just a character setting Can't say whether it is good or bad But whether it can be written well is the problem Some people take Batman as an example But why does Batman become a hero? Why not kill There are stories and reasons Batman is afraid that he will change if he starts killing. He will lose control It's like he is always hovering on the edge of a cliff If you take this step, you may never be able to go back to the past So Batman's image is full But our protagonist seems thin Why choose the Avenue of Saints? There is not even a psychological turning point, it is simply to read and ask for the Tao Seeking the Tao, seeking the Tao An ordinary person is inspired by the Tao in the book and decides to seek the Tao This is a great opportunity Reading thousands of books, I can understand the Tao in the book This is great wisdom Don't forget the original intention, be down-to-earth and move forward firmly This is great perseverance It's a pity that I didn't read it written by the author The protagonist seems to be a castle in the air There is no heel Added more private goods, it is just like boiled water, bland and tasteless At the same time, the work as a whole seems nondescript and annoying Take the movie "Let the Bullets Fly" as an example It is an extremely perfect combination of the body and private goods The proportions of Jiang Wen's subsequent "One Step Away" are obviously out of proportion I think the author's problem with this book is a bit like "One Step Away"

There are some things I want to say, and some things I don't know how to say. The protagonist, from an ordinary person to an extraordinary person now, the author has always emphasized that he is a seeker. After talking for a long time, what kind of existence is this seeker? I don't know if there is something wrong with the direction the protagonist is taking. Anyway, when I saw this, I felt that the protagonist had changed from a wise scholar to a reckless man. There is no progress, but continuous regression. This regression probably started from Feng Yun. Or it started with Double Dragon! Anyway, the protagonist's practice, I don't know where it started, but he has already started to let himself go in the way the author needs. The various realizations I had at the beginning have not been experienced for a long time. In short, all kinds of pretense, all kinds of strange participation in the plot, or changes in the plot. Most of the things the protagonist does are not human affairs. The slogan that everyone is responsible for the rise and fall of the world is shouted loudly, but it has never been done sincerely. Anyway, it's just a show-off in the plot. To be honest, at the beginning, the protagonist was really temperamental. Then gradually things began to change. Especially after the author repeatedly emphasized that the protagonist is a scholar, and the protagonist is afraid of death and cannot enter the country, I feel that his character is crazy. Unknowingly, the connotation of this book has disappeared, and it has turned into a Mugen-flow novel with reckless force!

No matter how powerful the people in the world are, they would not dare to openly oppose the imperial court. This is equivalent to rebellion!

As a bookworm for six years, I think: reading a book is not about giving up because you see the shortcomings, but persisting because you see the advantages! This book and the previous book are rare books that can help me find peace of mind from online articles! Those who want to see it can see the wonderful things and gain some insights! What I don't want to read is nonsense and I feel bored!                 ，，，！

Damn, I've wanted to say it for a long time. In 1980, the students all surpassed Qin Zhiyong. How could it be so fast? His talent is faster than that of the Chosen One, and he is as good as the template for the protagonist. Qin Zhiyong is very busy, and his cultivation level has only reached that level after so many years of cultivation. He is like riding a rocket when others penetrate him, surpassing him and surpassing his state of mind. The protagonist has been cultivating in vain for so many years. At the general manager level, they are all perfect templates for the protagonist. Isn't it a bit too much? Even though they are so powerful, this book is not worth reading anymore. If I still want to study the membrane below in the heaven, heaven will really allow it. What's more, if I really study it thoroughly, so many people will ascend to the heaven, then how can the heaven be overcrowded? God will allow it

Have been following this book. The author incorporates what he understands into it, and is not clear about Confucianism or Taoism. The author is also exploring! No one is perfect without flaws. This is how you have a soul. If the protagonist is perfect, it's just a routine.

I read this book. It's not good at the beginning, but it's better at the end. There's also the problem of time travel. As a modern person, if you arrive in the Ming Dynasty for no reason, you will think of time travel, but then you suddenly arrive in the Qing Dynasty. Do you think the person involved will not notice it, and there is no idea in mind. Writing a novel does not require you to have too much logic, but it cannot be too nonsensical. This will It's uncomfortable to watch, and the more you read, the more you don't want to read it, so the author just needs to change it. You don't need to have any system, just use a slightly explainable explanation, and don't want him to be confused. For example, where is Ip Man, you are in the United States, and then you are in Wang Chao. Don't you think that the span of time or the world is relatively large? It feels awkward to watch, and there is no connectivity. Your kind of novel is not as exciting as the systematic flow or the unlimited flow, but it is also a kind of Zhutian flow. Just like the principles you introduced, people also need a sense of coherence when reading novels. Work overtime!

Can the protagonist be more decisive? In fact, it doesn't matter if you kill people. As long as you stick to your heart, you can still do well. I think the protagonist is a bit like a virgin, which is not very good! It would be best if the author could change it, but if not, just pretend I don't exist. Personal opinions, for reference only!

It's rare to find a book that suits my taste. I'll give you the ticket.

I want to talk about how the protagonist travels through so many worlds. I flipped through the catalog to see how the protagonist travels across the world, and how he ends up in another world inexplicably, and all the other supporting characters know him. But it is like a metaphor for a protagonist who has done many things in the main world and has known so many people for many years, and then suddenly travels to another world. , All the supporting characters in another world know the protagonist, what's the point of this, there is no time and space ability or system, and there is no super power. How can you travel through time? I'm blind, but I'm not stupid. You wrote that the protagonist can travel across the world just by walking. It really makes my reader's IQ think I'm a fool. Forget it, the protagonist in Ip Man's world doesn't kill Japanese, what do you mean? Thinking about it, the logic of the protagonist is really ****. The Japanese enemy shoots the protagonist, and the protagonist maims the enemy and lets the enemy go? Even if the enemies survive, they will be disabled or survive to take revenge on the protagonist. Compatriots are killed by the enemy. The protagonist maims and spares people or does not kill? Is that a false Virgin? Do you know the butterfly effect? Japanese people have strong learning ability , I saw that the protagonist has strong martial arts, will study hard, and will retaliate cruelly. The protagonist also plans to let the Japanese go. The author has not learned history well? Do you know about Nanjing? Do you know about poison gas chemistry and so on? Return to Confucianism? The protagonist does not open a wide range of schools to teach knowledge and cultivate talents, but still studies by himself. That is a corrupt Confucianism, right? You know what being a Confucianist means? . Look at the catalog and then look at the title. Return to the heavens, without the ability to travel through time, to splice the world view into so many heavens? Speechless =_=, such a good title or theme was written down by the author, and this book is so popular? I can't remember where to click, whether it's the category or the ranking or the book. Forget it, if you scold me, just pretend that I didn't say it. .

We agreed, brothers, if we have money, we can make money together.

I feel like the protagonist is not very good at talking and doesn't understand the ways of the world! He talked about a lot of other people's shortcomings, and then said, don't mind if I talk about whatever I want! I think this happens to everyone at one time or another, although the smile on my face means I listened! But I'm definitely scolding my mother in my heart!

I don't know why so many people hate Confucianism, as if they were out to kill their father. I still remember that the classical Chinese texts in elementary school must have included Confucius' Analects and Xunzi's exhortations to learn. These are all teaching people to be positive. As for Dong Zhongshu's induction of heaven and man, and Zhu Cheng's theory of preserving natural principles and destroying human desires, they are just some shameless people deliberately misinterpreting the true meaning of Confucianism for their own benefit. Don't people nowadays also deliberately misinterpret repaying evil with kindness, 'repaying evil with straightness, repaying kindness with kindness'? How could this be missed? Moreover, people today are still deeply influenced by Song and Ming Neo-Confucianism without knowing it. Now is a good time to re-learn the pre-Qin Confucianism

I have been reading novels for 15 years, and your novel makes me feel that reading novels is not in vain. This is my first time to give a reward, just consider it a token of my appreciation, thank you.