
Marvel's One Punch Man
漫威里的一拳超人
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 466k Words
- Genre
- Light Novel
- Audience
- Male
- Subgenre
- Fan Fiction
- Updated
- 7y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
0Monthly votes
14.4kRecommends
30.3kFans
221Chapters
Tags
Synopsis
Reader comments
Readers also read
Falling in Love with an Agent Is Forbidden
Tokyo: a Guide to Taming a Villain
Dragon Clan: Become a Popular Character and Start Slaying Dragons
Yu-Gi-Oh!: the BOSS Is Actually Me
Qingdu Shanshuilang
American Comics Start with Superman
One Piece Achievement System
Disciples of Fangcun Mountain, Traveling Westward
I Have a Dark Secret Martial World
American Comics Survival Guide
Open a Rental in the Comic World
Fairy Tail Passive Invincibility
The author just wrote one book, and his writing skills are really bad. Look at the writing. It's very eye-catching. It even has One-Punch Man. The protagonist's IQ is not as good as Saitama in the anime. Saitama is a hero anyway. What you wrote is a brainless protagonist who prefers gangsters. As for why he saves the world, you have to ask the author.
Saitama doesn't have anything arrogant in Marvel, right? Only when he destroys the universe with one punch can he be more arrogant.
Awesome more updates
There is a saying that explains it very well. When it prospers, the people suffer; when it dies, the people suffer. This is especially true in the world of Marvel, which is constantly breaking out. Hope justice is carried out.
The author should have a bit of a flat-headed brother spirit, just do it if you don't accept life and death! !
Let me explain the strength of the punch. From childhood to adulthood: perfunctory boxing, ordinary boxing, serious boxing, and my guesswork of vigorous boxing, full-power boxing, and beyond-limit boxing.
Let's roughly analyze the characteristics of Saitama-sensei from the original work, and the reasons why Saitama-sensei is invincible but still popular. (Personal opinions, please correct me) First, Saitama never cares about other people's opinions. Second, Saitama can probably see through the good and evil of a person (weird) or its purpose. Third, when facing the eccentric Saitama, he never hesitates and eliminates the root causes. Fourth, Saitama longs for a close fight or even a headwind battle. Fifth, although Saitama is strong, he still lives an ordinary life, is still a human being, and is very sure of his race and position. Sixth, a hero driven by interest, so Saitama doesn't care about other people's evaluations and opinions, and Teacher Saitama is strong enough in both strength and psychology. Seventh, with the BGM, Mr. Saitama appears, and we know that this wave is stable. I didn't read what the author wrote, but I can get a rough idea from the book reviews. There are quite a few books about Mr. Saitama at the starting point, but it's basically difficult to write a book that captures the essence of it. It's probably a common problem to be grindy and stingy. What is Saitama-sensei's setting? Just strong! Invincible! Ignore everything and be strong! Not just strength, but also psychology. I just live an ordinary life, and deal with weirdos when I encounter them. I have nothing to do with you, Saitama exploded the meteorite, and was criticized for not being able to save the city. Do you think Saitama cares? And I remember Saitama said that he can blow up the earth and survive, so Saitama doesn't care about others at all. Invincible strength, invincible psychology, and the living conditions of ordinary people. Having strength means that you can do whatever you want, live the life you want, and do what you want. This is exactly what most of us ordinary people cannot do. All Saitama-sensei wants is a good fight, and most importantly, a supermarket sale 233😏
After seeing your explanation, I decided not to read it! I'm used to reading book reviews first Why do I have to endure it and continue reading when the previous ones are toxic? You have changed it later, so why not make a little change in the front? You admit it even if it doesn't look good in the front, why should readers think that as long as they tolerate it and change it later, it won't be poisonous? Reopen a new book, cut off the old one, and optimize the details. How can the results be better than now? It cannot be said that if you change it later, you can read it. You won't change the key issue before! Since we have the setting of One Punch Man, why do we still need to test it? It's superfluous. This conflicts greatly with the title of the book. You can play the game of cat and mouse. That's fine. If you don't want to solve everything with one punch, you can also be a Buddhist young man like Saitama. It's better than forcing you to follow the plot and the ending is no different from other Marvel books, and you still have the strength to solve it.
About the power of Saitama-sensei
Regarding Saitama's strength, in the last episode, in the battle with Pineapple, although the teacher ended the fight with a serious punch, the two had fought a lot before, and the teacher must have punched more than once during this process. I don't know what you think! When I describe the battle, I also want to describe it this way, because toward the end, there are more and more powerful villains. If the teacher punches them one by one, it will not be easy to describe. So my idea is, just like the teacher did in the last episode, let the villain be strong first, and finally the protagonist can solve it with a serious punch.
Ahimsa is the most ridiculous weakness of a hero. For example, Superman was forced to kneel down. In (Batman vs. Superman), no matter how strong the ahimsa is, it is just a weapon. The government can use various methods to control the pig's feet. No matter how strong the pig's feet are, it is useless. Moreover, this is a novel. Who would read a useless protagonist, unless the author forcibly lowers the IQ of the people around the protagonist, who are all lower than the protagonist. If so, think I didn't say it.
The introduction is pretty impressive, so um... Just sit back and wait for the value to increase.
Moon Step
The biggest failure at the beginning was to fuse Mary Jane and Gwen together, and to impose Gwen's plot on Mary Jane. In the plot of Dr. Lizard, Gwen was able to enter the Osborn laboratory to prepare the antidote because she was an intern at Osborn Company and she was a top student. You asked Mary Jane to prepare the antidote, let alone how she got into the laboratory through Osborn Company's security. As a third-rate opera singer on Broadway, would she be able to use those precision instruments?
Marvel fandom must have a plot, get to know Spider-Man, lick Iron Man, help S. H. I. E. L. D. But not join. The villains who offend the protagonist will all die, and the protagonist will not care about the positive characters who offend the protagonist. No matter how SHIELD forces and squeezes him, the protagonist should be fine... More than 90% of them are written like this...
The protagonist has low intelligence and endures it; the protagonist is childish and tolerates it! But if the protagonist still goes to SHIELD to be a dog, he can no longer bear it! If One Punch Man turns into a licking dog, this style of painting will be completely unsightly!
The writing that is based on Saitama's template doesn't feel like a teacher at all, and there is too much nonsense. Mary Jane and Gwen can be mixed into one person, a green tea bitch, and a passionate young woman. This can also be mixed. I'm convinced.
I couldn't bear it when I saw the title of the first chapter. Saitama is the word "" next to the word "", didn't you know? (Although many people are wrong)
To give up the pleasure of one punch for the sake of numbers, to be honest, it's a bit of a waste. . .