Dark Ginseng

People believe that immortals are living beings that transcend human life and wisdom, but people will eventually die. Only by solving the problem of death can one become an immortal. Therefore, cultivating immortals must be based on the premise of survival of life, wisdom and superhuman beings. Such immortal people are no longer ordinary people. When others think about this problem, they will say: Because immortal cultivators can master techniques that ordinary people cannot control, and can think of ways that ordinary people cannot think of! But why do immortal cultivators use the same things differently from ordinary people? Don't there exist the same rules in the same universe? This doesn't make sense, so the environment for cultivating immortals is not the universe in the ordinary sense. Different people have different environments, so it is only reasonable for mortals to practice immortality in an interface other than mortals. Ordinary people can enter other interfaces either by luck or hard work. If you do it by chance, it is a matter of great luck. I am afraid that there is nothing to say when this person is born in this world. Only by hard work can he stand out, because a person who is born different may not live long. The opportunity to surpass ordinary people should be to form an advantage step by step on the timeline to gain the opportunity to enter another world. Is this reasonable? My story is about how ordinary people grow to the point where they cannot fit into the world. It would be extremely unreasonable if there were no wonderful stories to tell about this process, right? Since this story is wonderful, it must be because the world is different. If it cannot be told well, it is because of the author, and if it cannot be understood, it is certainly not because of the readers. Therefore, it is a prerequisite that the author tells it well, but it is a flaw that the author is not good at it. He can only trouble the readers to find a way to understand it. I'm sorry, but you can't have the same understanding as an author with flaws, can you?