The Invincible Concubine-Born Son

The author's writing style is okay, but I just don't like it. There are many storms in the world, so I can't find corrections in online articles. It's really unpleasant.

I was about to give up the book, so I wanted to ask the guy who read it later if Chen Xizhi was dead and if he had collected it. If it is dead, keep watching. If it is not dead but it is confiscated, it depends on the situation. If it is collected, abandon it immediately. Innocent people in more than a dozen villages were killed by her. This is what you, the author, said yourself. Since you have set such a moral standard, but I see signs of whitewashing and forgiveness. If you still play with this ambiguity, it has become poisonous.

Although the logic and plot are very good, writing about powerful ministers is really not an easy journey. There are people suppressing and targeting the protagonist throughout the whole process, the emperor and Wang Pingzhang in the early stage, and the Queen Mother Wu in the later stage. This kind of writing method is difficult to attract more young readers, so I guess this book has a larger proportion of older readers than other books. Nowadays, everyone prefers to read more relaxed books. The books are indeed good books, but they are rarely enjoyable to read. Most of them are filled with the frustration of the protagonist being plotted against.

The power strategy is acceptable, but the military struggle is a mess. What do you mean by heavy armored cavalry? Ironclad cavalry, I know what you want to refer to, but can't you refer to it by the more professional armored cavalry and heavy cavalry/semi-armored cavalry. A hundred thousand-level cavalry hedging could kill hundreds of people at once? Do you think it's just playing house? Can three arrows be used in cavalry duels even if they are facing an enemy? This specifically refers to the fighting method of infantry into organized archers. Can light cavalry cavalry suppress city-defending archers? Do you want to read what you are writing? Don't you know the common sense that the draw strength of a riding bow is generally only about half that of a walking bow? It is an honor for very few ancient generals to fire an infantry bow immediately. Normal soldiers cannot do it at all, not to mention the advantages and disadvantages of upward and downward shooting, the accuracy of mounted and infantry shooting, the ratio of the bullet-receiving area of ​​the infantry behind the battlements and the cavalry below the city plus horses, and the cost ratio of cavalry and infantry. Any ancient commander who dares to use light cavalry to cover a city on a large scale will definitely be chopped up directly by his subordinates, especially the cavalry. If you have to die, it is better to chop you up and forget it. It can be seen that the author's understanding of cold weapon warfare is still at the level of the Water Margin of the Three Kingdoms, which lowers the overall level of the entire book. Maybe it's the books like Lonely Mike, Ke Shan Meng, and Xifeng Qin that have whetted my appetite. Generally speaking, it is not a poisonous weed, nor is it a fairy grass. If it is just a book shortage, you can feel free to read it as a transition. I hope the author will still study war-related knowledge more deeply.

It ended too quickly and the map was too small. Of course, the writing style is good. It's hard to imagine that it was written by a newcomer. I'm looking forward to the next book.

This book is the author's first work. I personally think it is very well written. The writing is online and the foundation is solid. Compared with works such as urban immortality, fictional history is more difficult to write, because it requires the author to have a deep foundation in historical literature, and the author's ability to narrate stories is also very powerful. Each link is connected, making it difficult for me to guess the final ending. It is the best fictional historical work I have seen in the past few years, but before The foreshadowing of the first issue was indeed very frustrating. I couldn't stand it and gave up. Later, I continued to read the works when there were no good ones. I was gradually attracted by the content behind it. I hope the author will continue to work hard. How high a new book can achieve is important, but it is also a good thing if it can accumulate some loyal fans for you. I believe that all the friends in the future have become fans of you. I hope the author will continue to work hard and create better works in the future.

The male protagonist once spoke righteously of his deep hatred for the lives of dozens of people in the village. With so many casualties among the men on both sides in the canyon, Chen Xizhi would definitely fight to the death. But then he faked his death and found out that Ye Qi had just let go of the one he saved? Not dying or being discovered is the greatest hidden danger for the monarch and his ministers. How can anyone not clear the mines, or are they mines mined by the enemy? Author, tell me, is this tmd unreasonable? Although I think Chen Xizhi is pitiful and I can agree that she faked her death, I don't agree that the male protagonist changed his mind so easily for more than 500 chapters. His character completely collapsed.

I don't know why fictional history insists on writing about a harmonious society where everyone is equal. In fact, it really doesn't make much sense. We can't even talk about that kind of productivity conditions now.

This is not a concubine, he is clearly the Frog Prince's Growth Story

Network map