The Dragon's Map of the World

No wonder nobody reads it. You didn't cut the weeds at the root. What kind of author is this? Writing about the Three Kingdoms? Stop writing and go write about Pleasant Goat and Big Big Wolf instead.

This is a Three Kingdoms novel that I think is exceptionally well-written, but it does have its flaws. So, please allow me to offer my humble opinion, and I hope the author and readers will be lenient. First, let's talk about its strengths: 1. The plot is excellent, fast-paced, with climaxes and humor.

Putting aside whether the powerful families looked down on you, in an era where birth determined one's social standing, would anyone actually support you? One should have self-awareness. Would currying favor with the powerful families prevent the poor from rebelling? Would it prevent the Yellow Turban Rebellion?

1. The biggest flaw in the beginning is that it says the entire family is wiped out, but then the elderly and children are released. It's even specifically mentioned that the villain leaves with a look of hatred and malice, and shouts out a villainous line, "My name is XX, come find me for revenge." I've heard some people gave up after this point, after all, it's a Three Kingdoms story.

A merciful general cannot command an army, and a righteous man cannot manage finances. Stop using the excuse of not being able to take control! It's a blood feud—if others don't die, you die; the hatred of a family wiped out is irreconcilable. Does being young mean you have no backing? Naive and childish.

Chapter 19: Slaughtering the entire Zhu family was a way to silence them and prevent leaks. But they spared the women and children. In ancient times, powerful families intermarried. Letting them escape would expose the scheme, wouldn't it? And then they wiped out the children? Isn't that just burying their heads in the sand? 😅

In ancient times, romance was... Unbelievable. The harem's interference in politics... A complete lack of decisiveness and ruthlessness... "If you don't cut the weeds at the root, they'll grow back in the spring breeze." Do you think they'd praise you for being merciful? Chaotic times are the stage for heroes. Heroes are ruthless, domineering, ambitious, and cold-blooded figures.

It's strange that some protagonists always use "human nature" as a topic for discussion. What exactly defines a human being? Does leaving something unchecked have anything to do with human nature? My understanding is no. Why are humans at the top of the food chain? Because they step on the blood of others. No matter how you explain it, the fact is stark and undeniable.

Leaving aside other points, let's just say this: for a woman to resist and rebel like this, how deeply infatuated must she be to resist these historically stunning beauties? Would a businessman who was incredibly successful in his past life resist such a combination of benefits and historical beauty? And then to try and mold them into modern, independent women? Are you kidding me?

Everyone, drop this book! It's too toxic. I couldn't even finish the first few chapters. He claims to be decisive and ruthless, unable to even lay a hand on his enemies, knowing he might be repeating the tragedy of the Orphan of Zhao, yet he still doesn't act? Doesn't he know the fish in the net will report him? If you weren't the protagonist, you wouldn't even last 30 chapters! You've forgotten the hardships of the past after a good meal! This is too toxic, goodbye!