Conquer the Age of Dawn of Heaven

In most of the wars between the Crescent and the Cross, the former tended to have the numerical advantage. Especially the cavalry. In the Battle of Mohachi, there were tens of thousands of Xipasi alone. Even France, the home of knights, could not produce so many fiefdom warriors. But Crescent Moon lags behind in many aspects, such as the navy. According to Osprey's estimation, Crescent Moon will no longer be a match for Cross after the twelfth century. And according to the Ottomans, they had a headache when facing the knight's plate armor, which was simply impossible to cut with a turtle shell, and the charges of European knights made Crescent trembled with fear during the Crusades. The siege of Vienna was crushed by the Hussars. The previous failures of Nickburg and Mohachi and the success of Mengisa are all proof. If the Renaissance had not led to the destruction of the fiefdom system in Western Europe, the population of Eastern Europe was too small and did not hold much voice. The glory of the Lancer is estimated to last for hundreds of years. In fact, Gustav had proven during the Thirty Years' War that charging cavalry was the most powerful. Moreover, Europe has picked up the Lancers again in modern wars, as evidenced by the large number of Polish Lancers in Napoleon's army. There is really no need to put away great resources and pursue the evil path of the 16th century pistol cavalry. It turns out that it won't be long before we have to walk back again.

Tragedy can make novels more in-depth. However, what you write, author, is an Internet article, an Internet article that travels through fictional history. It has nothing to do with depth. Internet articles make readers happy, but it has to be a tragedy that disgusts readers. Disgusting readers will only make your novel more and more niche. I believe this is what the author does not want to see, right? So please don't disappoint readers anymore? Let readers find enough fun points in your novels, such as a German orthopedics first (ಥ_ಥ)

The writing and plot of this book are both excellent, but from the moment Sophia is forced away, the protagonist is no longer a person, he is a slave of power and an ambition monster. The women the author describes are all very distinctive. Asselin (Zo Wei) in the last book is my favorite heroine over the years. However, the heroine of this book went from forcing Sophia away for power to arranging a marriage for her sister for power (I know this is a noble characteristic, but I came to see "Dawn"), and after the marriage, she collaborated with her sister to poison the husband who loved her deeply, which made me feel sick. When the brother and sister acted in collusion, the so-called heroic Ruo Sha in hunting clothes he described has become the excrement of power in my opinion, which is disgusting. As much as I loved Eragon and the free Asselin in the previous book, as well as the "Lenge Combray" who went through hardships to break the dark age, how much I hate and disgust the slave "Alexander" who is in power in this "dawn" era. I like Sophia very much in this book, but such an innocent and lovely gypsy girl still loves Alexander after breaking up with him and after Alexander became a slave to power. This makes me even more disgusted and disgusted by the protagonist brother and sister. Every time I see Alexander's disgusting desire for power, I think of Lenger dragging his sick body on the march. Lunge was not the Son of God, but he was still a man, a good man, Asselin's "little Rome." Especially during the days when Asselin and Lenger were captured, Asselin rejected the prince of Aleppo for freedom, and Ruosha, who poisoned her husband, looked even more ugly in comparison. She is not even as good as Isabella. I know Kingdom Rush is like that. But what I want to see is that you come to bring the light, not to change from a modern man to an "other" of medieval capitalism for the sake of power.

It's really infertile and laborious to comment, and I have to change my number. Now I want to ask whether excessively weakening France will make it a great HRE? A HRE who has no constraints and has irreconcilable conflicts with the protagonist on the two issues of inheriting Castile and Italy? Maybe Bohemia, Hungary and Wallachia standing together can do something, but compared to France, which can completely fight the Shinra for 300 rounds, and considering the Ottomans behind Southeast Europe, supporting Bohemia to destroy France is just taking off their pants and farting, and the effect is not necessarily good. I don't think annihilating the French army is optional. In addition, there is a problem that I have seen many times before, but my main account is not bound to my mobile phone and I cannot comment 😡 Now I will finish it all at once. Could the protagonist's claim of wanting Aragorn go through Juana instead of Rosa? Finally there is the issue of inheritance. In my opinion, the main line can inherit Spain plus Mauritania, the Lucretia line can inherit the Italian peninsula plus Africa, the Sophia line can continue to fight and become Byzantium, and Rome will become it. Then the protagonist takes Rosa to Persia, which was muddied by Ismaili, to rebuild Persia and revive Zoroastrianism. Our Alexander Empire is complete!

I really can't stand foreign time travel stories. The author is really conscientious and writes for fun. The topic is too niche and too few people read it.

Choosing the Renaissance was the biggest mistake. What era was Lenger in the previous movie? The Holy Land was lost and the Millennium Empire was about to be destroyed. Every time I think about this, I can't help but feel sorry for this empire. This is an era of disaster, but it is also an era longing for redemption. People are so eager for a savior, so they love Lenger so much and look forward to him defeating the enemy. But what exactly did Alexander do when he traveled across time? Develop business? Develop military. Come on, this is the dawn of Europe. It will happen sooner or later without the protagonist. If you let them enjoy this happiness in advance, you will also let them enjoy this misfortune in advance. To put it nicely, it means accelerating development; to put it badly, it means seeking personal gain. If Lenger established a human heaven, Alexander established only his personal kingdom. Alexander is no different from other starting protagonists, and there is nothing worth standing out about. When I looked at Lenger, it was a struggle between justice and evil. Although not many people advocate justice now, the values ​​we have received since childhood still make us biased towards the victory of justice. Even if Lenger did something unreasonable, we can forgive him. But Alexander was just a conspirator, a politician, and a man of power. Neither Alexander's victory nor Alexander VI's victory was worth the excitement. Since it is a struggle between conspirators, we hope to see a victory for a powerful conspirator. Therefore, the female pirate's infatuation with Lunge allows us to experience the beauty of love, while Sophia's infatuation will only feel silly and sweet and hinder us.

Writing about foreign countries is a niche, so I finally found another book

It's annoying enough to abuse the protagonist, but you're also abusing the heroine. It hasn't been put on the shelves yet, but the heroine has been lost three times. Isn't it completely disappointing? Literary youths should not always look to the Condor Heroes.

The Grand Duke is so pitiful..._(:з∠)_

I just read In Rome, and I know why this book got such a bad score. . As an author, you have to let the heroine take the blame? ? Have to arrange all kinds of inexplicable troubles? Nothing goes smoothly? Think about it for yourself, is this reasonable? This is no longer something that a literary youth can describe, absolutely

I want to know how Odoni died in the end in Chapter 42 of Volume 2? That bastard kissed Ruo Sha (σ;*Д*)σ and was sentenced to death!

The rest is true, I don't know how to say it

The book is very good, it feels a bit like watching an American TV series, but the pace is a bit slow and makes me sleepy 😰

After reading Chapter 40, let's talk about the poisonous points. 1. The protagonist has just traveled through time for a few dozen days and has done so many things? In complete darkness, with just a few details, you can grasp many of the plans between the bishop, the palace minister, and Alfonso? And it's brought in too quickly, right? 2. Is Sophia's line too abrupt? He was liked out of nowhere. There was a reason why the protagonist was liked, but it was really exaggerated. 3. Can you stop being such a riddle when writing novels? It seems that the protagonist knows about other people's plans and doesn't write them out in the book for readers to guess, but isn't he essentially the Riddler? Or is it that the author himself doesn't know how to write, so he pretends to be mysterious and uses this method to force suspense?

I have read another novel written by Solid Bear before. Needless to say, the writing style is very good and depicts the style of medieval Europe. However, I always felt that the author really failed in shaping the emotions. Like the previous novel, when the pig's feet are faced with emotions, just like the pig's feet in Qiong Yao's drama, the IQ returns to zero. If I have to find a way to describe it, it feels like constipation. I want to have a bowel movement, but I just can't. That kind of discomfort is really unpleasant. The description of the emotional drama, to be honest, did not add color to the character's character. Instead, it made many plots drag on and the character's character became cowardly and cowardly. Is such a person suitable to be in the political arena if he loves a woman and goes crazy? So please, the author, please think carefully about how to deal with emotional scenes. The emotional scenes you wrote are really sadistic. It seems that the poison in Qiong Yao's drama is too deep! !

The writing is okay, but it looks lonely 😃 Wenqing is in the late stage

I don't understand that so many people think this is a magical book, and it relies entirely on women to drive the plot. You wouldn't be able to write a book without women, right?

A question comes to mind: how does the protagonist's family distribute the inheritance? The law of equal division of inheritance is impossible, and the enfeoffment system is not in line with the historical trend. Is it possible to use the Turkish inheritance law to support Gu? 😁

For reasons known to everyone, the original book club group has exploded, and now there is a place for everyone to stay temporarily: 32899355, or search for "Conquer Heaven Backup". As for the new book, a corresponding new group will be opened after the start. (Please explain your purpose when joining this group, otherwise you will be sorry.)

The author's book has a detailed description of the politics and humanities of the society at that time, and the writing style is also very good. However, there is a huge flaw in that the protagonist does not look like a person who has received higher education in a civilized society, but looks like a migrant worker who came from a closed environment in a mountain village with limited cognitive abilities. This kind of person travels back in time and starts preaching, and many people in that era still firmly believe that if you have this ability, you can become a billionaire in a minute by selling goods live here, 😅. From the beginning to the end, I didn't see the protagonist doing anything practical. I only saw the experience of a villager who went to ancient times to become a magician, and his thoughts were completely assimilated.

I still prefer to conquer the kingdom of heaven, but it's a pity that it has been removed from the shelves.

The ending of the last book made me cringe. No wonder the number of clicks is so low after writing so many words. If you write cool articles well, you will get much better grades than you do now. Unfortunately, the author always suffers from literary youth disease. The protagonist is killed. The ending will be as miserable as possible. I suggest you read the author's last book first if you have just read it.

What are you doing in your other book Conquering Heaven? I was so excited when I saw "Defender of Jerusalem", but then I read the book review and saw the tragic ending. I skipped to the end and read the book. I jumped into it with cold water and it made me so uncomfortable.

"Conquering the Kingdom of Heaven" ‌Background Period‌: The Middle Ages (approximately 11th to 13th centuries), focusing on the Crusades, the decline of the Byzantine Empire, etc. ‌Protagonist Setting‌: A modern man's soul travels to Jerusalem. Because of his "resurrection from the dead", he is regarded as being favored by God, and gradually becomes involved in the struggle between religion and power in Europe. ‌Style Features‌: It focuses more on religious atmosphere, chivalry and medieval worldview, with a high degree of historical restoration and a calm rhythm. Listed as a "Medieval Historical Travel Masterpiece"‌‌ ‌"The Age of Dawn of the Conquest of Heaven"‌ ‌Background Period‌: The end of the 15th century and the eve of the Renaissance (1470–1510), covering the active period of Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo, the Ottoman Empire threatening Europe, and the discovery of the New World. ‌Protagonist setting‌: Ding Mu, a modern man, fell into the water while taking a selfie at the Old Bridge in Florence. He was rescued by a Sicilian fisherman and gradually became involved in the game between the Italian city-state politics and the Holy See. ‌Style Features‌: It has a more "big era" epic feel, integrating elements such as art, navigation, and the eve of the Reformation. The narrative is grander, the rhythm is faster, and the dramatic conflict is stronger. It has been listed as a masterpiece in the "Foreign History" category by multiple platforms, and has spawned Internet buzzwords.

He clearly emphasized many times that his hands were gone from the elbow down... He also wrote that his son put a pen in his hand and forced him to sign...

I recommend The Immortal of the Aztecs, it is well written and you can read it in the bookstore.

I'm almost halfway through watching it, and I want to talk about Sophia 🤭. In fact, if you don't like Sophia, you can think of her as a child. Didn't the protagonist also say that he hopes that Sophia will grow up quickly? As a child, everything before is explained. Because he is just a child, he will be willful and naughty. His life since he was a child is different, so this kind of character is also created. Of course, the protagonist's feelings for Sophia are adult love, which means that... The protagonist... Is a lolita control! Even if Sophia has a mature figure, she is still essentially a child 🤭 (Legend has it that when writing, the author will unknowingly bring in some of his own characteristics, hint~hint~hint~😏)

The previous game was still good, but the ending of the previous game was not very good. The protagonist's character was not that of lurking and then fighting back to Constantinople to regain the throne? Did you run away to the Southern Song Dynasty?

It seems that some of the chapters in the first few pictures are missing, which makes me confused.

From the article, it seems that the New World was given to my sister. But to colonize the New World in Europe, one must have a large territory close to the Atlantic Ocean as support. Mediterranean territories like Naples and the Two Sicilies are not as fun as the New World. Historically, those who colonized the New World were Britain, France, Portugal, and Spain. The territory was too small and the population too small to support a transatlantic expedition. The geographical location is not good in the Mediterranean, and Gibraltar is choking it. So I am very curious about where my sister's kingdom will be in the future. At present, the only place that the protagonist can get his hands on as a base for opening up a new continent is Spain. But Spain should be ruled by the protagonist himself, most likely to be left to his children with his legal wife Barendi.