My Great British Empire

Why do you always pretend to be so self-righteous and make up history for us? Is there a problem with writing the text directly? I won't subscribe to this kind of stuff once it's released.

If the protagonist allows an illegitimate child to inherit the throne, he will not only offend the entire European royal family but also all the nobles (including the English and Scottish nobles). Therefore, the author, it is best not to challenge this thousand-year European tradition (some older families in Europe still maintain this tradition)

Unified Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, established the national faith (Great Britannia) and the English Empire, developed the economy, population, and established the Royal Navy and Army. Now the population is 5 million (mostly children). At this time, they can challenge Portugal and seize its eastern colonies (India, Indian cotton, grain, iron). Ten years later (the protagonist is 29 years old) the population will be less than 7 million. At this time, black slaves and Indian slaves (castrated) were used to develop and occupy North America (America, Canada, Mexico), and Australia. Colonizing the East Singapore, Malaysia and more

The writing at the beginning is too raw and novice, which will scare off many people. Fortunately, it gets better after more than a hundred chapters. The farming style of writing is great, but it is a pity that the author may be limited by his experience and knowledge. There are sometimes noob plots, political conspiracies and conspiracies are shallow, military wars are a little light, and medieval military is less read. For recommendations on political systems, you can refer to Tripod or Puxiang Zhenren, or if you are willing to read more ideological textbooks... However, the author has made rapid progress. To be honest, the rhythm of writing in the future is no less than that of some famous authors. Many new authors have written several books and it is still like a running account. If you can't get good grades, it's not because you are not good, but because you are not good at it... Raise your paws to support me.

If the protagonist wants to unify the world, he should not do anything to fund his enemies in the future, even if they are his former compatriots. This is hegemony and greatness, without any emotion.

It is a bit difficult to write about Britain. The British are not easy to manage. The top management are elites and rarely wait to die. The nobles are well-educated and cannot be fooled. The British have good and long-term plans for doing things, especially the century-old navy. All these allusions came from the United Kingdom. It takes a hundred years for people in the past to plant trees and people to build a navy to dominate the world. It is really scary.

There is actually British literature. Britain's achievements are already achieved by the protagonist, right? It has been the world hegemon for hundreds of years and the world's leader for more than a hundred years.

. . Britain, which was already awesome enough before the 20th century, still needs you to travel through it? How about making a fortune by dressing up as a homeless man who was captured as a soldier outside a tavern?

Why did I think of the Earl of Glamorgan when I read the title of the book...

The first few chapters were really poisonous, what about the dark blade? Too middle-class?

No need to travel back in time, just the template for the protagonist. In fact, if you want to maintain the British Empire, you only need one thing: dismember Germany.

After taking office, the protagonist must vigorously rectify health problems (it is said to be for the sake of the country's face), prohibit incest marriages (it is said that incest marriages are easily cursed by the devil and give birth to problematic offspring), and standardize medical care (it is simply a waste of human life to bleed at every turn, and the protagonist may gain great reputation because of this)

The protagonist is only ten years old, has his IQ also regressed?

It's so ink that it takes three chapters to ride a horse, but it's better than the other one I saw that slapped him in the face and slapped him for two chapters.

I used to think that the Great British Empire was really an empire named the United Kingdom. Later I learned that that empire actually refers to India, the crown of the United Kingdom.

In the later stage, we should consider moving the capital to the American continent. England has limited potential.

My age has become smaller through time travel, and my IQ has also become smaller? ? ? ?

Are there any other books in foreign languages Guys!

I couldn't stand it until I saw the 7th picture.

I specially ordered a book to scold any author for writing any novel. If the protagonist's mental age is still ten years old, then you can imagine what state the author is in. The writing is completely useless.

Are you mistaken? How can it take so long to go from England to North America? Historically, the Mayflower departed from England on September 16, 1620 and arrived in North America on November 21. It only took 2 months.

Why don't the authors of these historical novels like to let the protagonists practice a little martial arts? At least exercise

I don't quite understand why the introduction says "centralized power", or "United Kingdom", shouldn't it be "Empire"? 😅

Bloody Mary in history married King Philip II of Spain, which is obviously impossible in this book

If you want to unify France, please pay attention to Joan of Arc's influence in France. How to solve it?

Let me remind the author that the 16th century was the golden age of the Swedish people's independence. From the declaration of independence in 1523, until the Seven Years' War in the North from 1563 to 1570 and the Kalmar War from 1611 to 1613, they all ended with Denmark's defeat. This period in history No one can say whether there was Denmark, a feuding country, and England was fishing in troubled waters, but it is undeniable that Denmark has gone through so much trouble and its national power has been greatly damaged (even the entire territory was occupied by Sweden in the Evangelical War in 1657). England has become the undeniable overlord of the North Sea region. And everyone who has played in Europe knows that the Kalmar Alliance of Sweden was destroyed to maintain independence. It is the right way to find a way to unite and then feed them to form Scandinavia, and finally merge them to form the North Sea Empire!

Grand unification and centralization will only solidify ideas and the system will not evolve. Once the time traveler dies, the country will no longer be able to progress. The courtiers will only fight among themselves and will never colonize overseas. Even the colonies founded by the protagonist will be abandoned by the bureaucrats. The butt determines the head. A hundred years from now, there will be no Renaissance and no industrial revolution in Europe. It is estimated that France will dominate the world and it will be another two thousand years of feudal society. Just repeat the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.

This is the first foreign historical novel I have ever read. I will read it again.

It has been raised until it is ready to be slaughtered. There seem to be a lot of historical gurus popping up in the book review section, but some of the questions they ask are silly. 1. First of all, the Tudor Dynasty was the most powerful era of the kings of England, and there was even a rare situation where there was no duke in the country. And a bunch of earls and marquises can't make some big news without the Duke taking the lead. Compared with Tudor, it is not Normandy. It does not regard Britain as its own colony, but as a completely native country. 2. Philip, who is said to be a useless god of history, will become the King of Spain in the future. Spain in the sixteenth century was the same as the Tang Dynasty at its peak, the British Empire in the Victorian era, and the American empire after the disintegration of the Soviet Union. It was unrivaled in the world. (Unless the protagonist makes big news in the future) Regarding the sister controlling the party, I hope the protagonist can consider imitating an Italian who cheated on his brother-in-law. 3. The imperial examination system is a bit poisonous. But if we consider that the bureaucrats in the city of London have been beaten to pieces by the protagonist, and Western European cities are highly autonomous and the aristocrats have no right to interfere excessively, it can be reasonably interpreted as a means of urban autonomy, and it is impeccable. 4. The age of the protagonist is not important. In fact, age has never been a problem. As long as the king can cultivate his own wings, it will be difficult to maintain the regency, especially in the (relatively) highly totalitarian Tudor. 5. I wonder if the protagonist has any intention of recreating France's claim? After all, the Hundred Years War between England and France had only just passed. 6. Colonization can be done slowly. Central and South America cannot capture Spain (it will become a bad move to marry Spain by force), Brazil is of little value, and France, the only competitor in North America, is still struggling to extricate itself from the internal strife at this time. A better choice would be for the protagonist to draw a nautical chart and directly send merchant ships to the Indian route, which can generate profits immediately without operating for too long. Maybe it would be a good choice to go south to colonize Southeast Asia to get spices. The only competitor, the Dutch, has not reached its peak in maritime power. As long as there is no peace treaty with the content of ceding territory or unification, HRE will not interfere too much.

I just got into this, so I can't post a review for this book, right?