Sissy Looking at the Sword

It's so uncomfortable. More and more novels are lost in this sea of ​​online articles. Maybe we will never see each other again that day. Without existence, there will be no memory.

??? Is the introduction wrong?

It's pretty, why is he a eunuch?

The book is good, but the updates are too slow. Recently, it has been updated every two days. At least once a day

The protagonist is a pretty paranoid guy, but the author didn't write it out! It feels like the protagonist is suffering from chuunibyou after traveling through time.

🤭🤭🤭🤭

It looks great, but it doesn't update quickly.

This book would have become popular if it had less of a gory attitude at the beginning. Keep up the good work and keep an eye on you.

A very thoughtful author, not bad.

Generally speaking, the writing is very good, especially the concept is quite novel. It breaks the routine of many novels today and shows the author's own style. The structure is well-conceived and logical. It is a rare masterpiece. Put it in the bookshelf. Looking forward to big updates!

The book is still too thin, so I have to keep it well until it is fattened up before slaughtering it.

Great, all my classmates ate my Amway, and we discussed the plot whenever we had nothing to do.

Sometimes, humor does not need to be deliberately written, but put into details, which makes it more contagious.

I really like reading your books, but they are good to read, but not enough to read!

The identity setting of the male protagonist is very unique. I support it. Come on, the author.

🤤🤤🤤🤤😵

It means that in addition to the bright lines in this book, the author can create a few more dark lines, and then write them in and out, which would be even better.

The writing is really great!! Very passionate!!!

I'm here to see you. Your grades are good. Come on.

First of all, the author's writing style and characterization are both good. However, when it comes to worldview construction, it still falls into the cliché. In a world where high-end combat capabilities are comparable to missiles, is it really possible for a stable feudal dynasty to emerge? Of course some people say yes and will give a bunch of reasons. It's up to you whether you can, but you must be able to justify it. Applying the feudal system of the past is a labor-saving method, but in the real world, an individual's combat effectiveness is only so small. If you want to cause trouble (rebellion), you still need the army. In this book, if you just pop up and enter the country, you can kill an army. So what is the use of the army? It's not that the military is useless, but it's not cost-effective. For example, an army of 1,000 people requires 2,000 people to support it. Then if I send 3,000 people directly to train an entry master, wouldn't it be much more cost-effective than raising an army? In addition, the systems and so on will be very different. I am just giving some ideas here. I hope the author will consider improving the world view.