Possibly being throttled by Jinjiang: brilliant stories whose popularity and quality are seriously mismatched. Note: for a story to make this list, having a colorful cast of female characters is the bare minimum
After reading the main text, I was so energized that I didn't dare to watch the extras (I felt like everything was really over after I finished reading)
This book is different from other books, and I don't want to spoil too much, so here are the advantages in general terms: ① There are very few books that I can finish reading, and they are still humorous and enjoyable to read without being too witty or trivial; ② The last dozen or so chapters are emotionally ups and downs, epic and tearful, and I like such a cruel author. I have seen too many high-flying and bad-driving stories, and there are really very few who can elevate this article to a higher level at the end [Holding fists] ③ There are no highlights, no preaching, just telling the story, right and wrong, for anyone to comment; ④ There is no flat character or complete tool man, even a small supporting role , also has its own arc, three-dimensional and complex - it feels like historical figures are really written as living people - not to mention online articles, not to mention fan fiction, many original high-scoring masterpieces are a bit less interesting in my opinion: they are good at using two-dimensional formula characters to be lazy, lovable and don't have to worry about shaping.
In fact, there are quite a lot of "niche tricks", but the attraction of the wonderful things outweighs my dislike of these tricks.
Advantages: ① Fast-paced and high-density upgrade flow ② The portrayal of human nature is more realistic, and there are many realistic and refreshing points ③ The amount of information is large, chewy and charming, the extreme world view map is large, and the setting is solid ④ The heroine is self-interested and far-sighted, and will not be interested in small interests in front of her. A large number of people died (this kind of selfishness itself is a kind of self-destructive stupidity) ⑤ There are various female characters that compose the spectrum of human nature, such as a leader-type old aunt, a mother and daughter who depend on each other... The male characters are also three-dimensional, but there is no female protagonist and two female supporting characters that attract me
Disadvantages: ① Controversial views on gender, likes and dislikes are the same → female mother-in-law, roundabout style of beauty [In fact, keen people can probably smell the author's xp when they see the "forbidden" in the copy] ② Low male realistic, but the author doesn't know why, all the articles give "very good life treatment" to the good-for-nothing handsome guy who has no personality charm at all, and is praised by various cannon-fodder female stars, who have never suffered, and Tianlong People... The reason why I can tolerate this is → the female protagonists she writes have very charming personalities; ③ The second point has already been mentioned, it is the plot of the cannon fodder girl, which cannot be called female competition, but she loves the male. The author's degree of care is probably female protagonist > male protagonists ≥ excellent female supporting role > male supporting role > cannon fodder male > cannon fodder female (the cannon fodder female is a low-level tool, she can be used wherever she is useful, to complement the charm of the male protagonist and to set off the special characteristics of the female protagonist)
Realistic to fairy tale (what am I talking about?) Anyway, it's very beautiful! I can't explain it clearly in one or two sentences, but my gender perspective definitely passes the test! Just from reading the introduction, you can tell that the female supporting role is well written. What's rare is that even the female passers-by in the article are carefully portrayed! Everyone is complex and three-dimensional, there is no pure tool! The male supporting character is not written in a very two-dimensional way. For example, 95% of the online articles with the attribute of "yandere" are written superficially and have no literary charm. This article is not like this. The realism of this book is experimental in nature with the author's personal thoughts, similar to "Do Navigators Also Want to Be a Heartthrob?"
So-so, I only insisted on reading 100,000 words. The first part is quite amazing. It's not that the author's writing is not good enough. Well, it's just that my requirements are too high, and I'm not very interested in anthropocentric saints (symbolic symbols that serve organizations, countries, and sects).
The author is a newbie, but he has great ideas (the writing may not be as good as those popular works, but I have a favorable impression of "works that don't have my outstanding points, and have no moon and stars in their merits")