[Harry Potter] [LM/SS] Half the Truth

The saddest thing about the past is that the pit that has been left unfilled for many years has not been filled. Woo woo woo

Sigh... There is a series in my lifetime, and I don't know if there will be a chance to wait until the author comes back to fill in the gaps. At least let me see lmss get married...

Why is the copywriting being changed? Is the author returning? Or will the book be banned?

I am childish. I will always review this article when I have time. I don't know how to contact you now?

Is this Deha CP?

Recently, I picked up the English version of Harry Potter because I am studying English, and I thought of many questions that I had not thought of before. I personally think that Rowling first started writing children's literature. At first, she probably didn't expect that Harry Potter would be so popular, causing so many people to question bugs in the text. I checked out one or two children's literature books in foreign language bookstores classified as 11-12 years old (which happen to be the target readers of the first Harry Potter book). Like the Philosopher's Stone, the general theme is: the protagonist's parents devote themselves to justice and leave the protagonist alone (often without any siblings, which is simply unscientific in a foreign country without family planning). ) - The protagonist receives skills training, meets a female friend, a male friend and follower, and a bad boy rival - after a hard struggle, the protagonist and his friends foil the bad guy's conspiracy and the bad guy escapes. In preparation for the second part, the protagonist's mentor ends the story with a chicken soup-style ending. However, the magical world that Rowling built was so charming that as soon as the seven Harry Potter books were released, they moved from children's literature to fantasy literature. Bugs caused by the imperfect setting of the original world view appeared. Even if Rowling was afraid, she was powerless. After all, it was difficult to recover. In the initial setting, I think it is obvious that Rowling wrote Slytherin as a gathering place for villains, Gryffindor as a gathering place for heroes, Hufflepuff as a gathering place for mediocrities, and Ravenclaw as a gathering place for nerds. To take a break from Peter Pettigrew and Regulus, we need to look at the whole rather than individual cases. There is no one in Slytherin who is good-looking, good at academics, and sunny. Hufflepuff has the three-in-one Cedric, Ravenclaw has the good-looking Cho Chang, Padma, Gryffindor's three-in-one Hermione, Harry, Bill, and Ginny. The rest are almost all positive characters. In Slytherin, there is only Blaise Zabini who is considered a handsome guy but his conduct is still worrying. Although everyone has high praise for the Platinum Family, this is not the case in the original setting, and Malfoy is probably a deformed variant of Malform, which is simply full of malice. And when we grow up and look back, a sorting hat determines the future of a group of 11-year-old children? No one cares about James and his team, Professor Bully, and they still become sunshine boys and winners in life? The professor's mother, a Slytherin, had her head squeezed by the door so hard that she found a Muggle like Tobia, who had neither good looks nor economics, and still refused to leave despite being domestically abused? What'sthefuck?

Yeah, it took almost 4 years for the author to write an article that doesn't make sense. I admire the author's perseverance!

I love LMSS so much! It has surpassed Snarry and become my favorite CP. It's so heartbreaking to be fooled here. And

Madam, I can't find you on iDianfa.

I came here to review it, and I found that my wife updated it again 20 years ago. It's so good. I hope I can cry one day when it ends.