[Classic Literature Crossover] How Novelists Change the Plot

After reading it, the ending was very rushed and I thought it would be a long story. There is no cp, but that's normal. Farinelli himself only has this short flowering period, and maybe only this short-lived passion. Jenny feels that she doesn't actually have much love between a man and a woman with him. The sudden stop makes the moonlight whiter, but he is not very kind... But it is also due to the society of the times. Edmond has too many secrets about each other, and there are too many things that need to be transcended and confessed. The two of them have been retreating for various reasons, and it is normal for them to finally reach this point. The career line of the heroine is indeed the most delicious, but just like the Han Dynasty, the power of the social era is greater than individual talent and hard work. Since she is not a noble and she is a woman, it is inevitable to borrow power, but she cannot reach this point without talent, wisdom and ability. Moreover, the author's reading volume of famous works is so high that it is very difficult for me to read them! Decided to make up for it! And do you have any recommendations for Quanyou Xifan? I really want to eat it (hey)

So far, I feel that the heroine lacks subjective initiative. She behaves very kindly and has some expectations for career development, but she has no sense of ambition at all and is a bit muddle along. In fact, she pretended to be a relative in the early stage. She could just like the male protagonist Long Aotian in many male videos, accept the donated property, and then use the property and connections to develop business. Once the business becomes bigger, she can save more people she wants to save. She is a bit drifting with the crowd, fearing that she is thought to be taking advantage, and has a petty-citizen mentality, which also reflects some of the author's ideas. I often feel that female videos lack ambition and require too high a moral bottom line. Many authors and readers of female videos require that the heroine cannot do anything morally defective. However, there is no big shot in the past and present who has not done something unscrupulous. In order to climb up the ladder, it would be wrong to humiliate one's own face. As long as it is not to actively harm innocent people, what about some strategies? Why can men do it but women can't? There is no such truth. I hope to see more ambitious and proactive female protagonists in the future.

Looking at it this way, this book should have no male protagonist. Edmund accompanies the heroine to grow up, and Farinelli is the fleeting fireworks in the heroine's life. At the end of this book, it really feels like a girl making her way through Paris. But what about the plot that the novelist changed? [Split]

This can't be considered a child. Burning people to death and burning people to serious injuries are criminals.

The most uncomfortable thing is that a once brilliant person died [cracked] because of a small stone on the road. I thought I would see a long article like the Prince's article, but I didn't expect to end up here? Well

Is this the end? Feel like there's still something unexplained?

Fari: Peacock in full bloom Earl: "accomplice" who shares the same hatred with the enemy

It's too much. I knew that child was so stimulated by his parents that his heart was twisted! But why is it Farinelli? It's too much!

What what? ! It won't be a tragedy, right?

I feel that once criminal issues are involved, minors, the elderly, and the mentally ill should not be considered for reduced sentences. This is not fair at all, let alone justice. Human rights are of no use in such a strange place.