An Eye for an Eye

No, most of the audience of this author has been accumulated from the previous part. How can the current style be completely different from the previous one? Besides, did anyone say anything unpleasant? Spiritual Shareholders Spiritual Shareholders, did the previous one really subscribe to the author? Ask what happened?

Why is he a spiritual shareholder? He was originally promoted by writing about being a popular person.

It's just a story about a dog-eat-dog wife who only has a few chapters in the text. Some people just read the copy and think they're going to divest. . .

Write what you want to write, and ignore some inexplicable spiritual shareholders

The author only wrote a little bit of text and didn't fully develop it before he came to the article to scold the author. He was originally a wife-chasing crematorium who couldn't read this. Why do you put your expectations on the author for no reason? Why should the author be irresponsible for your expectations?

Ah, there may be a misunderstanding in the comment area. I saw the original post on the author's wife's vb. The writing was still very earthly, not deliberately sadistic at all, and if I remember correctly, the writing was very licking (it was just the post I read at the time, which is based on what my wife actually wrote in this article later).

😂 Even a small Miao Miao article can go crazy. It's fair to say that the bottom of the dog-blooded tweets are all offensive articles.

Can anyone please stop posting random comments about daddy in the comments?

Ah, I just found out that my wife wrote a new article, so I rushed here, but why is it a sadomasochistic article 😭 😭 😭

I feel like my wife will be tortured in this book, which is a bit different from the previous one QwQ