[The King's Avatar][Jiang Botao X Zhou Zekai][Jiang-Zhou]

Hahahahahahahaha Ye Shen

Why is the hair locked (?_?)

I would like to ask the author, will this article be updated?>

... This tone sounds like Ye Shen...

In fact, the discussion last night and this morning had a high degree of achievement in terms of coherence! At the beginning, I said that the story should not only have "things" but no "reasons", and the "reasons" should be pointed out skillfully as the plot progresses. In the end, she and Xiong Lian talked about this, and finally figured out the "reason" of this story (which she expressed as an attitude towards life). As for the things that remain unchanged in the process of change, my understanding should still be biased towards the direction of faith, although Xiong Lian is very helpless about my persistence. I really think she is not self-aware, or is she aware but unwilling to admit it? The whole life she gave to the second female lead is actually very tragic, and it is actually quite interesting to dig into the deeper concepts and beliefs. But Xiong Lian doesn't worry about this. She probably prefers her fresh concept. Everything is light, just like painting certain paintings. No stroke needs to be emphasized. Whether it is a cruel or non-cruel past, let it pass calmly, and finally achieve a very refreshing ending. During the conversation, Ah Piao was the first to say, "This article projects some of your own stubborn ideas about certain things, and of course it is just a subconscious projection." I missed it at the time, and Xiong Lian did not answer directly. Looking back afterwards, I realized that this sentence was the truth. The excerpt that was thrown out at the beginning of the article, and the description of Xiong Lian, really gave me a feeling - "Ah~~ It is indeed something written by a modern woman~~~ The concept of love reflected is closer to modern thought, and it is even a view that a woman who has not been very successful on the road of modern love." This point was sometimes hidden and revealed in the subsequent conversations - Xiong Lian is still very good at hiding her true intentions. What's more, during the discussion, I have discovered that she may be gradually revising the relevant plot and related concepts. This is the inevitable result of the information asymmetry between the two parties in the debate. Even if our debater has >3, we still do not have an advantage. Moreover, Xiong Lian is an author who focuses on the types of characters she writes. She does not deliberately summarize how a certain character is, but just wants all the characters to finally express a certain artistic conception she wants to express. The advantage is that the characters are not stereotyped, but the disadvantage is that the author cannot decide how a specific character will think in a specific situation, so the boundaries between people will indeed be less clear. When setting up certain plots, you may feel that if this person does this, it will work with that person; or if this person says this sentence and it is effective, if you change it with another person, it will have the same effect. Maybe she and I have big differences on this matter. I just think that the person should do whatever it is, and it has to be done by him, and no one else can do it. After the intermission and into the second half, I was a little annoyed and couldn't help but ask her: "(Although the debate about unequal information makes me want to punch people, and besides, the initiative lies with you, not me.) But what I want to beat you is, you used thunder and abuse, and used a few jokes to blow up a group of people first. What kind of mentality is this?" The most fundamental reason why the bear face caused many people to besiege her was that she probably just wanted to throw some thunder into the girls first, and tease them happily to show that I was also good at writing raves and so on. Who knew that the girls overreacted and protested. "Do you feel that you have already thrown out the worst, and no matter how bad it is, it is nothing more than that, and no matter how bad the rest is, it can always be better than these? You are secretive, picking out some fragments to show off, and then when people refute your attitude, you throw out the plot bit by bit. Is this considered step by step?" Although these two sentences are a bit contradictory and clearly stated that she "meant to tease people," I still think I was right. The criticism at the beginning was misleading. There was not even an outline. It went directly to fragments, allowing readers to use their imagination to connect these fragments and draw an inevitably biased conclusion. In the end, some of this conclusion was overturned, but the interpretation did not have the impulse to applaud; while some still existed. For example, we all agreed that the article imitated the ancient but did not resemble the ancient, the shape was similar but the spirit was not similar, and some logic could not withstand scrutiny. What follows is a bunch of questions about her personality. Even though I still don't understand why she reacted so violently? But it's a matter of life and death, and I don't have the right or position to say anything. Over. P. S. I really like to use concluding words such as "To put it bluntly" and "I understand". Will people secretly mock me as the "appraisal emperor"?