He’s Actually This Kind of Angel [Hebrew]

I saw a lot of comments in the comment area, and it happened to be another sleepless night, so I couldn't help but start typing... I write whatever comes to my mind, just my personal opinion. I think this statement is a typical formalist error. Readers who hold this view only see the surface, but fail to see through the numerous and changing phenomena the essence they want to express through these superficial appearances. The middle piece "Raphael's Travels in the World" does not focus on the so-called gender inequality. The human world described by the author is not only about this phenomenon. This phenomenon is nothing more than a form in the final analysis; it focuses on the evil and good in human nature. (Human nature itself shows countless forms, such as one gender oppressing another gender, such as human selfishness, such as the flash of human nature) Raphael is concerned about, or he always tries to see the essence through phenomena, and never gives up on himself no matter what the situation is. He always maintains thinking, observation, introspection, and independence, looking for answers and pursuing the truth, even if there is overwhelming resistance from the outside world. In the middle part of the text, whether it is a journey to the human world or a descent to the earth, this is an experience. Walking down to heaven or into the human world, you can experience the human world and the world personally. As a member of the human world, coming from the human world, going to the human world, and going through this journey, we have established a deep and close connection with the entire world; we also have a deeper understanding of ourselves, understand ourselves, and perfect ourselves. This is a process of self-realization; in the end, we can make choices based on practical and concrete concepts. It should be noted that only when a person lives with deep truth and pain, when you personally participate and understand, can you truly care about something and invest love in it. Prior to this, Raphael was a "foreign object" to this world, he had nothing to rely on, and even the Messiah was just an anchor and sustenance of nothingness: on the one hand, he was not the same as the Messiah, and on the other hand, as a visitor from another world, he lacked the willingness to actively establish contact with this world (without practice and experience, he had always been an abstraction). The state of separation is due to the instinct of self-preservation; this also means that Raphael has not accepted the status quo. Without accepting the status quo, it is impossible to correctly understand the world, let alone take the next step: in these years as an angel, Raphael seemed to be doing things but was not doing them. He was stationary, trapped in his "past life" that he could not return to), and it was the Messiah who forced him to semi-integrate into this environment. As a foreign object, he is lonely and wandering. What he pursues is not the "human" as a living thing, but the environment he comes from (let's call it our current world). He needs a sense of identity and belonging, but this world cannot have it, or it is too far away from developing like us. Therefore, he is always looking for the past. He regards the past life that he has forgotten as a sustenance, and desperately grasps the illusory and empty "self" like a drowning man grabbing a life-saving straw - his past life experiences and values. The reason why they are said to be empty is that they have not been implemented by Raphael. In the early days, Raphael was full of luck and the illusion of getting something for nothing, and he was also timid. And the more he grasped at it, the less he could be accepted by the world. The more Messiah "emptied" him, the more Raphael wanted to grasp those lost things, as if they were proof of himself and his past existence, falling into a vicious cycle. However, as long as you go through amnesia, you will find that your persistence is false. The falsehood lies in: first, sustenance should be internalized within oneself. He will find that what he is obsessed with is in himself (or in other words, himself) and around him. Second, in the same way, Raphael's various reflections on human beings are actually not similar to the Messiah. The more he invests in expectations/interference, the more "disappointed" he will be (when you are an observer, that is, a person who does not As an external evaluator who is connected to the event, you judge others, and you are always right no matter what the person being observed does. For example, Raphael thought it was good, and thought it should be done, but when Spartacus did not listen to the advice and decided to stick to the end, Raphael felt that he was too stupid and too stubborn. Later, he missed Spartacus again after encountering other things. I believe that the world still needs some such people and such persistence. At different stages, the outside world's concept of an individual or group will change. If this changing outside world is allowed to decide and interfere at will, and this outside world has extreme power (the power of God, full control, omniscience and omnipotence), what will the individual become? Being in a dominated position, which is why the Messiah's attention and love will always lead to the destruction of mankind) Only by letting go/letting go can you develop/achieve satisfaction and get [what you really want to see]. This is why Raphael finally said, "The future of mankind belongs to themselves and should not be interfered with. (What he said to the Messiah, the future of mankind belongs to themselves. We are not human beings, so why should we care?)" The Messiah's gaze is an interference, so why is Raphael's hope and hope not the same? They must learn to let go of themselves and the outside world. Only after letting go can they pick up and obtain. I am also grateful for this incident. From the initial Raphael alone to the "descending" of both people, it gave the two people an opportunity to develop their relationship from the bud to the groundbreaking. It allowed Raphael to live with the Messiah just as Raphael himself. In other words, it gave Raphael the opportunity to face and realize directly, and it also gave them the basis for true equal dialogue (1. Raphael has the courage: theory comes from practice, and theory guides new practice. These solid experiences are emboldening. Source: Without these experiences, Raphael would not have deeply realized that even the Messiah [does not know] [cannot see], it is about the Messiah himself, about Raphael himself, about the relationship between the two, and about the world) (2. Putting aside the memory of an angel, Raphael has put aside self-limitations in his self-awareness, referring to the various tangible and invisible constraints brought about by the fact of class and subordination when facing the Messiah) If Raphael had not walked, experienced, lived, seen, and struggled in this new world, he would have been as arrogant as the Messiah before he dealt with human problems, because he was not a part of this world, nor did he regard himself as one there. In the human world, Raphael used unparalleled action and courage to vividly and concretely demonstrate: in such a bad situation (evil people are not ashamed to resist), women are enslaved, and interestingly, when women become the ones in power, they are just like the men in the past. Just as inferior, reflecting the extremely harsh environment and lack of materials, the evil and ignorance of human nature), so backward, so unable to see hope, especially the hope of developing into the past society (a place to find a sense of identity), and even realizing that it might have been There is no such place (this is my inference: Raphael may also be aware of the beautification of the past life in his subconscious, and human nature has both light and dark sides. In fact, there is both ugliness and beauty in the current world, and they exist in everyone at the same time). Still upward, by going deep into this era and world, struggling ugly and ugly, and deeply integrating with this world, he shows amazing perseverance and vitality. It is the clear embodiment of the main purpose of "no matter how difficult the environment is, be positive." The incompatible environment did not make him succumb, the limited human spirit of dominance did not make him give up exploration, the absolute control of the Messiah did not blind him, love did not make him blind but became stronger, and in such a desperate and gloomy world, he still did not give up - did not succumb to despair - still believed in - the future and possibilities of mankind. He was not only exploring and recognizing himself, but also tirelessly exploring mankind itself. Of course, the whole article is a presentation of this process, and we can see that Raphael never surrendered to the Messiah 233333 (hilarious, although, you love him jpg) Today's Raphael is an organic synthesis of the self shaped by his previous life and his deep exploration of the world. He understands the past very clearly and does not need to search for it but internalizes it within himself. He does not suffer from human nature, does not blindly believe and follow blindly, has firm beliefs, and acts decisively without hesitation. Raphael's growth is a spiral and inner realization, a spiritual level. How much has Raphael grown compared to his initial subconscious evasion of facts and responsibilities and fear of facing "maybe the environment in his previous life will never come back" and not daring to get deeply involved in this world (for example, Raphael seems to have made efforts to avoid tragedies such as the Garden of Eden to Satan and others, but in reality he is almost the same as a reasonable person who stood by and stood by. Jpg Because of the original survival and existence itself They are all completely dependent on the Messiah and lack relative independence, which makes Raphael appeal for rights and freedom but cannot and does not take action to fight for it; so I say that the human journey in the middle gives people confidence. As a human being, Raphael fully "acted" and "struggled" and "practiced" and "done" in those years in the human world. This is the internalized self-confidence and sense of accomplishment and fulfillment) As an aside, I believe that after traveling to the human world, Raphael has already accepted that "this world may indeed not be the one in his previous life/maybe he will never be able to reach a similar environment in that previous life." People can grow and make changes (and change the world) only on the premise of acceptance and acceptance (Messiah was indeed changed!) The ending is left blank and ends abruptly, attracting people's imagination, and the beauty is full and just right.

In the end, the Messiah's behavior reminded me of the observer effect. There is no doubt that God's thoughts are enough to interfere with people's behavior (fanaticism). When God looks at the human world, people will praise God, believe in God wildly, and then appear in a state of ignorance (particle). When God's attention is attracted by Raphael, the human world will develop technology on its own (wave state).

I read it all night long. I like this book. Everything is just right. The rhythm of the writing, the characterization of the characters, and the ending are just right. I also like that the author writes the work according to his own will and wishes without being forced. The ending was already hinted at the beginning of the article, or Raphael's fate was hinted at the creation of the world. These clues also appeared frequently in the subsequent writings. One of the more prominent ones in my impression was the Messiah's explanation to Raphael in the creation chapter about his preferences or feelings. Love affects the gods in reverse, making them have the desire to create the world; one is when Adam talks about love, but he loves himself (not the original text); the other is when Raphael opens the mirror and answers to himself inside, and the man who gave the correct answer is spat out. (1. The Messiah once told the reporter that Raphael's desire is to not believe in God and to be himself. This desire will not be eliminated in the Holy Light; 2. The answer is a man, which is not only one of the manifestations of self-love and the implementation of self-will, but also evidence that Raphael loves the Messiah. The Messiah: a god who does not need to be defined by human gender jpg) All these illustrate the destiny of Raphael and the Messiah. To a certain extent, it can be said that everything in the world exists because of Raphael, and the Messiah created everything for Raphael. The desire of the giant is not the desire of the giant, it is the desire of the Messiah, maybe the desire of God, but the cause is Raphael, and it is the Messiah who produces this desire. The Messiah makes this desire multiply (take root on the ground and spread throughout the earth): the Messiah cannot eliminate his own desire. The "accusations" of Messiah and Raphael actually reflect each other. Messiah said that human desires cannot be eliminated, which also applies to him; Raphael said that Messiah is arrogant and stubborn, and this also applies to him. They are similar but different. The most interesting thing is that the Messiah cannot really have whatever he wants. They are not that free, but they have realized each other's freedom by depriving (abandoning) (← Speaking of this, I remember a certain chapter said that in order to achieve or gain something, you have to give up part of it. At that time, you were helpless and forced. Now it is Raphael's self-choice. The brilliance of his self-will is shining, great and sacred. As a reader, I am also very happy to see the end) and realize each other's freedom. There's no way not to call it love I saw some people say that the middle part is incomprehensible, trivial and messy, and that men and women don't know what to express. That's not the case. All of this is the only way for Messiah and Raphael to deeply understand themselves and each other. They finally came to each other and were approaching each other. Human beings are most like the Messiah. The preference of the gods when they created the world is the feedback or reflection of the Messiah's heart. I can't help but spread the word. Sometimes what people fear or hate the most is often a part of themselves, so what does the Messiah hate (going back to the creation chapter, it seems that I have already given the answer) And just like Adam's self-love, the self Adam saw in the water, Raphael and Messiah ultimately loved each other as much as they loved themselves, gazing at each other and belonging to each other for a long time. As Raphael said, Raphael is indeed the desire and special case of the Messiah, and all creation is praying for the Messiah, but Raphael gave the Messiah what the Son of God could not do: look at the present, rather than the ever-present future. Whether it is he or be is not the criterion for judging this book. From the moment the Messiah surrendered his unique gaze to Raphael, I saw the perfection between them, or from the moment Raphael said don't reject me, or maybe it was from the moment Raphael made this decision that it has reached eternity. It is very touching and touching. I can feel a quiet wash and thrill. Raphael dedicated everything to himself, thus realizing the implementation of himself. As a result, the future of mankind will be continued. Also as a result, the Messiah will not be a prisoner of the future (according to this, the Messiah is not omnipotent) and can truly see the world clearly. I can't think of a more tender ending than this. Raphael is no longer a human being, but the brilliance of human beings is given to the love of the Son of God. Raphael possesses selfless selfishness, and he gives his selfish selflessness to the Messiah.

Well, confusing ending. Raphael abandoned the memory of his past, and the Messiah indeed looked at this Raphael, the angelic Raphael, not the Raphael with human marks. Look at the world from one person's perspective, not looking at the future, but seeing the present. The world is saved by this. These two are more like a collision of different ideas. They are a pair who always have differences when they want eternal companionship. A little desire is enough to accompany them. But I still want to see these two get more intimate, ahhhhhh!

Then did they do anything sexy later? Jpg ... Ah, as expected, little angels are little angels. People like me will be judged and eradicated immediately after falling into the world written by the author because of evil desires, haha...

I couldn't stand it until halfway through. After watching the ending, emmmm, I still feel like it's hard to explain. Is the Raphael who lost his memory still the same Raphael? I haven't seen the emotional line yet. It's like no CP. Maybe the emotional line will start later, but I don't want to watch it. I really feel uncomfortable watching it.

Is there any extra? I don't understand. Raphael has forgotten his past self? And then play with the Messiah again, right?

I have to say that what attracted me at first was the crazy angelic appearance and the intensely inhuman portrayal of the protagonist. In the middle section, I was completely attracted by the short stories in the Old Testament. My personal understanding is shallow, so let's talk about things other than the protagonist, from the Two Rivers to the Nile to the Mediterranean, from the Garden of Eden to Egypt, Somalia to Assyria and Sumer, the wandering Jews coming to Canaan, and finally to Rome. Some familiar stories have new annotations in the author's writing. Many historical articles like to write in the context of divine power to royal power, but this article has a very important female line when talking about religion. The narrative of the second sex always seems to be bitter, from Eve who was born as Narcissus to Adam, to the women who became vassals of angels in Somalia. The floods are not enough to wash away the sins, and the absurdity on the Ark is still happening again. In the hidden corners of history, stories of women losing power and men seizing power continue to unfold. Of course there is also Lilith, Sariel, women with extraordinary power, the magical country of Sumer. But these stories are no different. Those who control the productive forces have the right to speak, and those who have the power are either hidden or feared until civilization, which liberates all productive forces, defeats barbarism. A very good piece of Hebrew that saved me from my literary shortage~

I've finished reading it. It's completely different from other Hebrew texts. It's sad, true, and hard to calm down.

In fact, I don't really understand... But human beings can continue to develop, and the Messiah is not trapped in the future. Raphael suffered from dementia (x) for a while but seems to be recovering, and everyone has a bright and happy future? The end is over, see you again~