While writing All Sea Is Water, I realized that heartwarming stories with too many adopted children really don't work that well. The more I wrote, the sillier it got, so I'm done with that! No, I've decided to start another story. This time the heroine will adopt only one little one, for a one-on-one parent-child story.
It will be divided into three volumes, with three heroines and their respective children. My heroine has to be the strongest, most overpowered heroine ever (smirking doge). There may be couples, but romance won't play a big part.
Volume One: A retired general and a gloomy little Dazai.
Volume Two: A bestselling author and an innocent young Chuuya.
Volume Three: A former professor and a wandering little Ranpo.
I don't know whether the heroines in the last two worlds will have love interests. We'll see. For now, I've put it in the romance category.
But I'm really not good at writing romantic plots, so don't get your hopes up about that.
I'm a goofy author who's written so much silly stuff that I can't go back.
Theme: A simple, peaceful life is what matters most.
Isn't this book updated? (Crying Cat Head JPG)
Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see Want to see
Very sharp comment, Verlaine.
I feel that the author did not make it very clear on the topic of "whether artificial humans are human beings". . . As an observed representation, this question can exist in the truth of "the world is my will". The human rights doctrine mentioned in the article also starts from personal interests, which is not recognized by philosophy (personal interests here are regarded as objects because the subject cannot be observed). In other words, there is no answer to this question in philosophy. It is also a special kind of representation other than true representation and abstract representation. It can be observed more intuitively when abstracted from time and space. Therefore, there is no correct answer to this question and there are countless possibilities. The results of observation are not within the scope of philosophy because the object will be processed by capital.
! Great! But I don't understand what the last sentence means qvq
Ahhhhhhhhhh! It's Youzai! Young Zai!!!!! It's rare to see such a confused Zai, I want to take two more puffs! (Unconscious)
Will the author update more? (I would have been relieved if I had known earlier, or maybe I had given up earlier if I had known earlier)
"Naiye" caught a big bug for the author - isn't it the Jingzhe?
Claw, I like it! What a cure!
Ahhhh, I'm really looking forward to the parent-teacher conference~