The Black Moonlight Holds the BE Script Steady (TV Series: Till the End of the Moon)

321 Began to sing. I wear white clothes and do good deeds. I learn from Gongye Jiwu. I learn from Yue Fuya. Why do you still not love me? A demon actually believed in this set. He hoped that the gods would bless him and he carved his own tombstone with his own hands. Pretending to be the Su Su carved by her, he realized that she had given him so little love in this life. It turned out to be a fake, but it still didn't make me happy. If it was her, even if she just looked at me like this, I should be excited. I wear white clothes and do good deeds. Why don't you still love me? Ye Xiwu has no soul. I have traveled through the three realms for Ye Xiwu has no body, so I will take one for her, so you must die. If you have the ability, let me fall in love with you. Otherwise, you will definitely lose this bet on the fate of the six realms. How could I let you go? I will only be entangled with you for the rest of our lives until our bones rot together. I have seen sentient beings in the three realms under the claws of demons. I work hard, the North Sea is drying up, the South Mountain is collapsing, and the world is filled with sorrow. I never dare to forget where I came from. The road is ruthless and has no hatred or resentment. Jin is not a person who can fall in love at first sight. He is a madman who is obsessed with death. The craziest fool in the world. You have seen the common people in the common life talisman. If I can wish you. From now on, the path of immortality will bring blessings to the world. You demon god has only one weakness in your life. Five hundred years ago, I exchanged my divine marrow for your demon bone magatama and quietly told me that even if I have the divine marrow and the demon bone is destroyed, you will still be wiped out. So I hid it and sealed it in my soul. So even if I have the ruthless way, I can't become a god. Because my bond is that I hoped you would live a good life and I promised you to protect you. Ye Xiwu loved the young emperor Li Susu who embroidered the hijab for her. She also loved Cang Jiumin who mended her soul in the dream. Just like now, I love you who forgot to go home.

Henhaiqingtian is such a good product

Thank you Su Su and Jin Huang for accompanying you during this time. You and Ah Mi will definitely be happy in the parallel world!

People should respect themselves. In more than a year, I discovered a lot of violence. It is true that I was angry once, and then several people said that I was ridiculous. I didn't doubt my anger, but what was I angry about? The peaceful liberation of Peking has been compared to the surrender in the TV series version. Sometimes we should first check whether we are in the same world. Obviously we are not in the same world. Fortunately, a big guy who paid for nothing told me that getting angry over a FMCG with confusing logic, mess, and mess is like arguing with a porcelain person about who poured it first. It is meaningless except for soiling oneself. Often, most of the results are that there is nothing we can do. We talk and explain and explain, but in the end it can only turn into a long sigh. Everything in this world is like the Yellow River. Even if you are clear, when you merge into the Yellow River, you will no longer be your own color. You can't help whether you are clear or not. Someone: "xxx thinks the world is virtual, is he crazy (mentally ill)...?" "I used to be interested in this kind of topic, but then I lost interest. It doesn't matter whether the world is virtual or not, the pain is real." If you also encounter something that makes you feel wronged, and at the same time you find that the rules that bind you are distorted. You must step forward and correct this distortion. If you don't break the egg shell, the world will be a blind prison that imprisons you. Don't be afraid of the desolation and barrenness outside the prison. Don't worry that if the prison is destroyed, there will be no food supply. Outside the world, I will always be waiting for you. There is no distinction between right and wrong, black and white. Grandstanding is against human ethics. There is no self-examination at the top and no introspection at the bottom. Brainless conformity leads to chaos. He speaks loudly and has a eloquent tongue. Pretentious and self-serving. The fox pretends to be the tiger's power and acts as the tiger's aide. The monkey wears the crown and is unscrupulous. Summary: The logic is confusing, full of loopholes, nonsense, and unconvincing. When faced with mistakes, human nature often exposes two kinds of inertia: one is escaping due to shortsightedness, always thinking that denial can bring about a turn for the better - indeed, in some rules, this trick has been tried time and time again; the other is fear of the consequences, fearing that once one admits one's mistakes, one will not be forgiven, but will receive endless accountability and attacks. Someone once participated in an accident investigation and came back only to sigh: the truth is never important, peace is the key. Fourteen people paid the price with their lives, and in the end it might just be reduced to a ridiculous report and a silent silence. "If you die by my spear, there is no need to try to understand these words; if you can bury me... Promise me, you will use the fire as fuel, raise the flames, and continue to fight against the black tide." Understanding is a quality that has a very high threshold, is expensive and scarce, and often requires payment to obtain quickly. Otherwise, in many cases, it can only depend on luck and chance. The vast majority of people, unless they have the same ideas or happen to agree at the time, essentially have no ability to understand. Because. "Crescent moon, please illuminate this land again, like a white dove soaring in the night sky, like the blue ocean washing away all evil spirits. For those who believe in you, and for the hope of tomorrow, I wish you to rise. Crescent moon, pure and innocent crescent moon, I will get rid of suffering together with you, wipe away the tears for all living beings, and the world under the moon will eventually become clear again. Moon, our moon, may you shine a soft glow on this world What good is mourning and heartbreak, if punishment cannot cleanse away the sin? Can you hear the sound of swords? It was the brave roar of the people, not the plaintive singing of the prison. Terrible disaster, destined destruction Can't take away the moonlight, can't take away the hope Fly, our little dove, fly With the moonlight that belongs only to you Fly, our little dove, fly freely Fly, our little dove, towards the world under the moon Listen, the bell song of destiny is already playing The tide has brought hope of freedom Thousands of years of torture, dark disaster I will no longer invade my hometown of moonlight Will eventually be washed away into the blue ocean Wake up, new moon, illuminate the dark earth Until suffering and violence fade away like the morning dew Let the evil spirits who take the name of gods have no place to live Let the evildoers be buried forever in the long night of ignorance."

Using Hindu logic, we can understand the torture text. In a nutshell: exchange for the right to make a compulsory wish through penance. In Hindu mythology, we can often see various forms of penance. For example, standing in the fire, standing on one leg for decades, not eating or drinking, enduring the scorching heat and cold... This is not an addiction to self-abuse, but because they believe that by enduring great pain, they can accumulate a strong spiritual energy or merit. When this kind of merit reaches a certain level, they can make a wish to the gods, and the gods must satisfy it. This is not a gift from the gods, but a compulsory right to make a wish that is independent of class. The most famous example is the legend of a mortal ascetic who wanted the wife of the great god Shiva. Shiva is one of the supreme gods in India, but facing this mortal who has accumulated earth-shattering power of asceticism, he still has to give up his wife. The logic is roughly that I have suffered inhuman crimes and accumulated enough capital. My pain is the hardest bargaining chip. Now I can't even refuse me if I ask for anything. In a sense, the logic of a female frequently abusing a female protagonist is basically the same. The abuse suffered by the heroine includes but is not limited to being misunderstood, having her family broken up, losing her child, being ignored and hurt... It is actually valuable. The more severely she was abused in the early stage, the higher the pain capital accumulated by the heroine in the readers and story logic. If you save enough pain capital, you can exchange it for your wishes. The most common and core wish is for the male protagonist, especially the noble male protagonist, to have the ultimate, single-minded, regretful love and compensation. In the early stage, they tortured the heroine so much that she jumped off the building, and in the later stage, they had to chase his wife to the crematorium, put down all his body, dig deep into his heart, obey his orders, and spend the rest of his life to pay off the debt. The logic of this type of novel is roughly as follows. The story itself has a set of invisible rules to maintain cognitive fairness between the author and readers: since the heroine has endured such profound suffering, she deserves the greatest compensation, and the hero must use the strongest love and pain to repay this debt. The intensity of compensation is often directly proportional to the depth of the early abuse - no matter how hard you abuse me, how deep, humble, and unshakable you must be to love me in the end. It's very similar to the Hindu formula of "the more exaggerated the suffering you endure, the more exaggerated your wishes can be" (except for eternal life). The difference is that the deity here is replaced by a domineering president/emperor/big boss, and the wish is that you can only love me, and love me until you die, and give up everything for me. Why does this novel have such Hindu logic? According to my observation, there are several reasons. First, although many people fantasize about their boss falling in love with them, they also have the anxiety of "why does such a person love me?" In many stories, including the underlying psychology conveyed by many stories, the heroine, the author, and the substitute readers often have a question: Why does that superior, omnipotent and high-quality male protagonist fall in love with ordinary me? Is it purely because my soul is interesting or am I different from other women? Then this is too insecure. In fact, the articles that are popular on many female channels now about "a noble lady from an aristocratic family abuses a mindless time-traveling girl" are essentially satisfying many people in this regard - by abusing those women who have a sense of deservingness, who feel that they are different and can be loved by outstanding male protagonists, to prove that their own perceptions are correct, and to transform their anxiety about men into a sense of superiority that they are sober in the world and understand men better. On the contrary, because I "understand men better", I am more worthy of the love of an excellent male protagonist. It's very typical, as big as the logic of knowing, other women who take the initiative to please are the playthings of inferiors, and I am the true love and confidant. The existence of the theory of masochistic compensation perfectly solves this anxiety: I don't just feel that the other person must love me. It's because he hurt me first, and what he owes me, the love and good treatment he gives me, are what originally belong to me, and are reasonable and just compensation. This love is not for no reason and may disappear, but is purchased with actions. It is based on a huge sense of debt, making it more reliable and necessary. Just like some women think that the flowers and plants outside will only hurt their men. When men get older and wiser, they will naturally know that they are the reliable partner. The internal logic of many such female videos is also similar. Other women are bastards, and only they are good to the male protagonist. The male protagonist was ignorant when he was young, but later he was taught by society to be a human being, and then he realized that the female protagonist is good, so he is more affectionate and unrepentant. So you will find that many female novels that abuse the heroine will then abuse the supporting characters more violently, especially the supporting heroines who were arrogant and domineering in the past. Behind the abuse of the protagonist is even more endless revenge on the supporting characters. Because this kind of article likes to do a set of combos: first, seize the victim's ecological niche. Secondly, because I am a victim, it is okay for me to hurt others. To put it bluntly, the purpose of abusing yourself is to abuse others more unscrupulously. This kind of theory is actually very common, and there are many of it in reality. You can see similar shadows in those very extreme online sentiments, such as some extreme family of origin theories, and some extreme gender speeches. Then let's talk about the second point. Pain is essentially a lever for the weak to defeat the strong and class, satisfying the author's and readers' shortcut fantasy of class crossing. The core joy of many female videos is that they rise in class and counterattack purely through personal struggle? It might be too difficult, too slow, in the harsh world constructed by the novel. Not to mention the real world, many authors themselves do not believe that they can succeed through hard work. Relying on men and relying on love/marriage to change class is often described as a more "efficient" way. Even if he says that he has to work hard, he still does not deny that men are an indispensable springboard for his struggle. The problem is that directly writing about getting something for nothing would seem unreasonable and unrealistic. Therefore, Shao cleverly resolves this unreasonableness here - you see, the heroine did not get it in vain, she paid a heavy price, and this is the compensation she deserves in exchange for her pain. Pain has become the currency to buy tickets to the upper class: no matter how good and powerful you are, as long as you have hurt me, it means that we are equal, and I can ask for extreme love from you as compensation because you owe me. In extremely unequal relationship settings, such as CEO vs. Clerk, emperor vs. Maid, the heroine is weak in the early stage. The extreme abuse and accumulated pain capital became the core bargaining chip and moral high ground for the heroine to strive for equality and even leadership status in the emotional relationship in the later period, and became a powerful emotional lever. Of course, this design itself is also in line with the creative skills. From the reader's point of view, the abuse brings a strong emotional impact and sense of substitution, and the ultimate compensation of the wife-chasing crematorium brings huge emotional release and refreshment. This strong contrast of hardships and joys is itself an effective narrative routine and emotional massage. On the contrary, because of the sympathy for the heroine's pain, readers will emotionally strongly demand this kind of compensation, thinking that this is the justice that the heroine deserves. The pain itself that the female protagonist endures forces the male protagonist to repay it with extreme love. This is an unshirkable obligation for the male protagonist. The uneasiness about pure love, the desire to overcome obstacles, and the simple sense of justice that longing for sacrifices will eventually be rewarded ultimately constitute this strange ascetic wish theory - to pay is to endure great suffering, and the reward is to obtain some kind of strength, grace or satisfaction beyond the ordinary. Suffering becomes a kind of capital that can be quantified, accumulated, and ultimately redeemed. Therefore, the fact that the female protagonist is so cruel is, to a certain extent, building an emotional penance system similar to that of Hinduism. The suffering endured by the heroine is endowed with extremely high value and becomes her compulsory right to ask for the ultimate emotional compensation from fate and the male protagonist, especially the male protagonist who caused harm, that is, a near-absolute love and obedience that cannot be refused. The God of India has to give up his wife to a man who is practicing extreme asceticism. What kind of request is it for the CEO and the emperor to give up his sincerity? Of course, now female videos have begun to be updated and iterated, and there are also some authors who continue to perpetuate this wish-making theory under the banner of being a heroine. She found that the male protagonist could not give her a satisfactory love, so she practiced hard and finally made a wish. Not only did she ask the male protagonist to give in to her, but she also asked him to give everything he had to him. Then he would either regret it for the rest of his life to compensate the female protagonist, or simply give up his life. This is very typical of Zhen Huan. Of course, now female videos have begun to be updated and iterated, and there are also some authors who continue to perpetuate this wish-making theory under the banner of being a heroine. She found that the male protagonist could not give her a satisfactory love, so she practiced hard and finally made a wish. Not only did she ask the male protagonist to give in to her, but she also asked him to give everything he had to him. Then he would either regret it for the rest of his life to compensate the female protagonist, or simply give up his life. This is very typical of Zhen Huan. But the funniest thing about this is that Hindus themselves don't believe in this. It is true that Shiva cannot refuse the person who makes a wish, but Shiva's wife found a toad and turned it into a beautiful woman, making the wish-maker mistakenly think that it was Shiva's wife. Then when the wish-maker expressed that he wanted this woman to be his wife, both the wish-maker and the wife were very happy. □□ Means that I am □□, but the wish-maker said that is not the case, you are Shiva's wife. After seeing the ending of this story, and then thinking about the endings of many female pornographic novels, it seems like a joke from hell. Complaint: In a sense, Hinduism is the art of bugs.

I came back to see Susu after a long time, and suddenly I felt like crying.

[] Not only can I afford this novel, I have collected it since it only has the second edition of the copy and no text in it. Nothing else. I like to see how Li Susu lives.

[Good Luck Lotus] Tucao: In a sense, Hinduism is the art of bugs. Using Hindu logic, we can understand the torture text. In a nutshell: exchange for the right to make a compulsory wish through penance. In Hindu mythology, we can often see various forms of penance. For example, standing in the fire, standing on one leg for decades, not eating or drinking, enduring the scorching heat and cold... This is not an addiction to self-abuse, but because they believe that by enduring great pain, they can accumulate a strong spiritual energy or merit. When this kind of merit reaches a certain level, they can make a wish to the gods, and the gods must satisfy it. This is not a gift from the gods, but a compulsory right to make a wish that is independent of class. The most famous example is the legend of a mortal ascetic who wanted the wife of the great god Shiva. Shiva is one of the supreme gods in India, but facing this mortal who has accumulated earth-shattering power of asceticism, he still has to give up his wife. The logic is roughly that I have suffered inhuman crimes and accumulated enough capital. My pain is the hardest bargaining chip. Now I can't even refuse me if I ask for anything. In a sense, the logic of a female frequently abusing a female protagonist is basically the same. The abuse suffered by the heroine includes but is not limited to being misunderstood, having her family broken up, losing her child, being ignored and hurt... It is actually valuable. The more severely she was abused in the early stage, the higher the pain capital accumulated by the heroine in the readers and story logic. If you save enough pain capital, you can exchange it for your wishes. The most common and core wish is for the male protagonist, especially the noble male protagonist, to have the ultimate, single-minded, regretful love and compensation. In the early stage, they tortured the heroine so much that she jumped off the building, and in the later stage, they had to chase his wife to the crematorium, put down all his body, dig deep into his heart, obey his orders, and spend the rest of his life to pay off the debt. The logic of this type of novel is roughly as follows. The story itself has a set of invisible rules to maintain cognitive fairness between the author and readers: since the heroine has endured such profound suffering, she deserves the greatest compensation, and the hero must use the strongest love and pain to repay this debt. The intensity of compensation is often directly proportional to the depth of the early abuse - no matter how hard you abuse me, how deep, humble, and unshakable you must be to love me in the end. It's very similar to the Hindu formula of "the more exaggerated the suffering you endure, the more exaggerated your wishes can be" (except for eternal life). The difference is that the deity here is replaced by a domineering president/emperor/big boss, and the wish is that you can only love me, and love me until you die, and give up everything for me. Why do these female-channeled novels have such Hindu logic? According to my observation, there are several reasons. First, although many people fantasize about their boss falling in love with them, they also have the anxiety of "why does such a person love me?" In many stories, including the underlying psychology conveyed by many stories, the heroine, the author, and the substitute readers often have a question: Why does that superior, omnipotent and high-quality male protagonist fall in love with ordinary me? Is it purely because my soul is interesting or am I different from other women? Then this is too insecure. In fact, the articles that are popular on many female channels now about "a noble lady from an aristocratic family abuses a mindless time-traveling girl" are essentially satisfying many people in this regard - by abusing those women who have a sense of deservingness, who feel that they are different and can be loved by outstanding male protagonists, to prove that their own perceptions are correct, and to transform their anxiety about men into a sense of superiority that they are sober in the world and understand men better. On the contrary, because I "understand men better", I am more worthy of the love of an excellent male protagonist. It's very typical, as big as the logic of knowing, other women who take the initiative to please are the playthings of inferiors, and I am the true love and confidant. The existence of the theory of masochistic compensation perfectly solves this anxiety: I don't just feel that the other person must love me. It's because he hurt me first, and what he owes me, the love and good treatment he gives me, are what originally belong to me, and are reasonable and just compensation. This love is not for no reason and may disappear, but is purchased with actions. It is based on a huge sense of debt, making it more reliable and necessary. Just like some women think that the flowers and plants outside will only hurt their men. When men get older and wiser, they will naturally know that they are the reliable partner. The internal logic of many such female videos is also similar. Other women are bastards, and only they are good to the male protagonist. The male protagonist was ignorant when he was young, but later he was taught by society to be a human being, and then he realized that the female protagonist is good, so he is more affectionate and unrepentant. So you will find that many female novels that abuse the heroine will then abuse the supporting characters more violently, especially the supporting heroines who were arrogant and domineering in the past. Behind the abuse of the protagonist is even more endless revenge on the supporting characters. Because this kind of article likes to do a set of combos: first, seize the victim's ecological niche. Secondly, because I am a victim, it is okay for me to hurt others. To put it bluntly, the purpose of abusing yourself is to abuse others more unscrupulously. This kind of theory is actually very common, and there are many of it in reality. You can see similar shadows in those very extreme online sentiments, such as some extreme family of origin theories, and some extreme gender speeches. Then let's talk about the second point. Pain is essentially a lever for the weak to defeat the strong and class, satisfying the author's and readers' shortcut fantasy of class crossing. The core joy of many female videos is that they rise in class and counterattack purely through personal struggle? It might be too difficult, too slow, in the harsh world constructed by the novel. Not to mention the real world, many authors themselves do not believe that they can succeed through hard work. Relying on men and relying on love/marriage to change class is often described as a more "efficient" way. Even if he says that he has to work hard, he still does not deny that men are an indispensable springboard for his struggle. The problem is that directly writing about getting something for nothing would seem unreasonable and unrealistic. Therefore, Shao cleverly resolves this unreasonableness here - you see, the heroine did not get it in vain, she paid a heavy price, and this is the compensation she deserves in exchange for her pain. Pain has become the currency to buy tickets to the upper class: no matter how good and powerful you are, as long as you have hurt me, it means that we are equal, and I can ask for extreme love from you as compensation because you owe me. In extremely unequal relationship settings, such as CEO vs. Clerk, emperor vs. Maid, the heroine is weak in the early stage. The extreme abuse and accumulated pain capital became the core bargaining chip and moral high ground for the heroine to strive for equality and even leadership status in the emotional relationship in the later period, and became a powerful emotional lever. Of course, this design itself is also in line with the creative skills. From the reader's point of view, the abuse brings a strong emotional impact and sense of substitution, and the ultimate compensation of the wife-chasing crematorium brings huge emotional release and refreshment. This strong contrast of hardships and joys is itself an effective narrative routine and emotional massage. On the contrary, because of the sympathy for the heroine's pain, readers will emotionally strongly demand this kind of compensation, thinking that this is the justice that the heroine deserves. The pain itself that the female protagonist endures forces the male protagonist to repay it with extreme love. This is an unshirkable obligation for the male protagonist. The uneasiness about pure love, the desire to overcome obstacles, and the simple sense of justice that longing for sacrifices will eventually be rewarded ultimately constitute this strange ascetic wish theory - to pay is to endure great suffering, and the reward is to obtain some kind of strength, grace or satisfaction beyond the ordinary. Suffering becomes a kind of capital that can be quantified, accumulated, and ultimately redeemed. Therefore, the fact that the female protagonist is so cruel is, to a certain extent, building an emotional penance system similar to that of Hinduism. The suffering endured by the heroine is endowed with extremely high value and becomes her compulsory right to ask for the ultimate emotional compensation from fate and the male protagonist, especially the male protagonist who caused harm, that is, a near-absolute love and obedience that cannot be refused. The God of India has to give up his wife to a man who is practicing extreme asceticism. What kind of request is it for the CEO and the emperor to give up his sincerity? Of course, now female videos have begun to be updated and iterated, and there are also some authors who continue to perpetuate this wish-making theory under the banner of being a heroine. She found that the male protagonist could not give her a satisfactory love, so she practiced hard and finally made a wish. Not only did she ask the male protagonist to give in to her, but she also asked him to give everything he had to him. Then he would either regret it for the rest of his life to compensate the female protagonist, or simply give up his life. This is very typical of Zhen Huan. Of course, now female videos have begun to be updated and iterated, and there are also some authors who continue to perpetuate this wish-making theory under the banner of being a heroine. She found that the male protagonist could not give her a satisfactory love, so she practiced hard and finally made a wish. Not only did she ask the male protagonist to give in to her, but she also asked him to give everything he had to him. Then he would either regret it for the rest of his life to compensate the female protagonist, or simply give up his life. This is very typical of Zhen Huan. But the funniest thing about this is that Hindus themselves don't believe in this. It is true that Shiva cannot refuse the person who makes a wish, but Shiva's wife found a toad and turned it into a beautiful woman, making the wish-maker mistakenly think that it was Shiva's wife. Then when the wish-maker expressed that he wanted this woman to be his wife, both the wish-maker and the wife were very happy. □□ Means that I am □□, but the wish-maker said that is not the case, you are Shiva's wife. After seeing the ending of this story, and then thinking about the endings of many female pornographic novels, it seems like a joke from hell. Complaint: In a sense, Hinduism is the art of bugs.

The "gods" walking on the earth can only be evil gods. Aren't the wealthy Americans who designed the killing line afraid that they would also be killed? Congratulations to the author for discovering the biggest bug in the "Western Civilization" narrative. The so-called "Western civilization" that contemporary Chinese people are familiar with is essentially the original and true Western civilization, which has been deeply processed by a group of overseas Chinese intellectuals and "four dissimilarities". Although there are elements of truth in it, this large group of intellectuals also stuffed a lot of private goods into it, adding to their own knowledge monopoly. (This behavior can be summarized as "Japanese". It should be noted that the word "Japanese" here does not only refer to restoration, but also means "self-dwarfing". It is the so-called disillusionment with one's own traditional culture and placing hope in copying foreign achievements. ) So □□ educates us, "Read more to avoid being deceived by intellectuals." (It is perfectly normal for a great man of this level to use the word education, and I can accept the word enlightenment.) Exposing the scam of this group of people who are trying to monopolize knowledge requires reading a lot of books, but most people know very little about which books they should read. Sometimes we are misled and deceived by public opinion. Instead, we read more and more "traps" set by others, and fall deeper and deeper without realizing it. This is a very sad fact. My personal suggestions are: first, read more original historical materials, and second, think more logically. For example, a core question in modern history: Why did China form a situation of warlord separatism in modern times? I gradually learned about this issue while studying the history of the founding of the Chinese People's Liberation Army. Since the Opium War in 1840, I have learned how China fell into a warlord structure. In this regard, the historical materials I rely on are mainly from two aspects. One is Luo Ergang's "History of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom" and his series of books, and the other is the county chronicles of the hometowns or nearby counties of major warlords in the Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China. These two historical materials have basically not been deeply processed. They present original and true historical records without historical perspectives, which can better reflect what really happened. Then, a very simple logic will be exposed: The history of the rise of warlords is the combination of financial power and military power. This is the logic of the endless warlord regimes that have emerged throughout modern Chinese history. The Qing government has never really gained the power of public opinion, and has always "co-ruled the world" with the scholar-bureaucrat class. It lost financial power after the Opium War, and further lost military power after the Taiping Rebellion, and the situation of warlord separatism was formed. In the end, the Qing government completely lost its administrative, legislative, and judicial powers, and the regime was officially disintegrated. During the Republic of China, the leading National Government failed to obtain nationwide financial, public opinion, and military power from beginning to end. Therefore, its regime could only exercise administrative, legislative, and judicial power within its own sphere of influence. It was not until the Republic, until 1955, that the country's financial power, military power, and public opinion power were finally unified. With the suppression of bandits in the southwest, the march into Tibet, and the advancement of the "Japanese War", the dispersion of financial, military, and public opinion rights across the country has officially ended, which lasted for at least a hundred years. Only then did the people's political power really have executive, legislative, and judicial powers. This period of history actually reveals a very simple knowledge point that can even be called common sense: the basis of political power is financial power, military power, and public opinion power, which is what we often call "money bags," "gun barrels," and "pen barrels." Executive power, legislative power, and judicial power are only derivatives of political power, not the foundation of political power. The vast majority of intellectuals deliberately concealed this point when spreading the so-called "Western civilization" to the country. They were vague about the basic conditions of the "separation of powers" and focused on the objective. They in turn exaggerated the means of exercising political power (a specific form) as the foundation of political power, which led to loopholes in the explanation of real problems in Western society. In the final analysis: the explicit government fools the people through the so-called "separation of powers"; the shadow government controls the real power by grasping the "three poles". Or to put it another way, the "separation of three powers" is formal justice, and the "three poles" are substantive justice. The real operating logic of society is controlled by the "three poles" rather than the "separation of three powers." This is the bottom reason why you can see today that the separation of powers in the United States is well-established, but the people at the bottom are struggling to make a living, and that everyone in the society has a "killing line" chasing after them. It's not just because of "capitalism" or something else. There is a problem with the operating logic of the "three poles", which is far more fundamental than a problem with a certain form of production organization. To put it bluntly, do you think there is no killing line in feudal society? Will there be no killing line in socialism? Didn't the Soviet Union cross the killing line? Why has targeted poverty alleviation solved China's poverty line problem? Without going deep into the most basic issues of establishing a political power, we cannot explain the reasons for the existence of the "Alice Line" and the "Kill Line". Of course, this article is just an answer. There is no need or obligation to explain this question completely and comprehensively. It is just a mention. After all, you are not paying for it, right? Returning to the question raised, are "rich Americans" afraid of being killed? Afraid. Not afraid either. The "rich" who only have money bags in their hands are afraid. This wealth does not belong to them, it is just stored in their hands; A rich man who has a gun in his hand is really not afraid. For a rich man who is truly armed, his wealth is inseparable from himself; The rich man with a pen in his hand is even more unscrupulous and unshakable. The "wealth" in his hand is no longer just assets and currency, but real "power". Some "rich people" will be killed, and some rich people are really impossible to be killed. It's as simple as that. This is the difference between "new money" and "old money". The short-term wealth obtained through the manufacturing or financial industry is at best some assets or currencies. However, the "old money" that buys guns and cultivates pens by grabbing the money bag is essentially different. This is the reason why upstarts like Musk desperately want to get into the government and gain political power. It is also the reason why people like Jack Ma jump up and down. Without the support of guns and pens, the money bag will not be stable, and the killing line will not spare him. Power has a natural tendency to make peace, join forces, and form alliances. Transactions between powers are naturally necessary. When power holders engage in power transactions with each other, they need to be restricted and vigilant. This is why the political broker ecosystem exists. When you realize that the real power does not lie in executive power, judicial power, or legislative power, but in financial power, military power, and public opinion power, you will immediately understand the reason why these political brokers exist, and you will also immediately understand why some rich people are carefree and carefree, while others are anxious and anxious. People like Wang Lin, this "track", and the people who are playing in this track now are like crucian carp crossing the river. In the 2000s, there were a large number of people participating in this "track". There are also many so-called "national master" tracks now, such as a certain bald-headed "pawn". In the final analysis, the "Chaoyang District Three Hundred Thousand Rinpoche" back then followed this track, but his brain was not very good. Their goal reaches the core of the power circle, which is the "three poles." Of course, people like Tu Mi and Wang Lin have neither money nor guns. They are just trying to do "writing", mainly on the spiritual level. After 2012, this track has become unpopular. Anyone who has really been in the system knows that this track is tightly blocked. The official saying is "be wary of political brokers." The people still hanging around in this track are people who have never been in the system, "characters" like Bald Mi and Hu Chenfeng. Wang Lin's downfall signifies that the attempt to gain substantive power through the track of "public opinion power" is dead. This is where China and the United States, East and West, truly divide: Regarding financial power, China has ensured that mainstream financial power is always in the hands of the people and belongs to the public through public ownership as the mainstay. The United States and the West have eliminated all public ownership, leaving financial power in the hands of a very small number of people. As for military power, China has ensured that military power is centralized and unified through the people's army and the party's command of guns, and it belongs to the public; the United States and the West have not yet unified military power, and a large number of private soldiers are rampant. The so-called "checks and balances" are carried out between the US military and the National Guard, the National Guard and various law enforcement agencies. There are even many blatant "security" companies. Regarding the power of public opinion, China has not done well enough in this regard and has not been able to develop a more advanced management method of public opinion power. However, it has at least achieved the separation of public opinion power from political power. The control of public opinion power by the United States and the West has reached its peak. Last year, Israel's attack on the Gaza Strip demonstrated this set of tricks to the fullest, so I will not go into details here. The roots of the "Killing Line" and "Alice Line" are far deeper than ordinary people imagine. Deconstructing them to the bottom will reveal the hypocritical and evil nature of the so-called "Western civilization" in modern times. Montesquieu's "separation of powers" theory is cunning and insidious. It perfectly separates the surface logic and the deep logic of the operation of power. After whitewashing, distortion, exaggeration and deduction by a group of literati, it describes a "heaven on earth". The "gods" walking on the earth can only be evil gods. How could there be such a realistic book? Although it is fictional history, let's talk about real history. The most famous one is that Empress Lu turned Mrs. Qi into a human pig. However, there are human pigs, human pigs, and spiritual pigs. The core logic of historical events: Liu Ying's collapse was not simply due to fear of torture. Background foreshadowing: Liu Ying was pushed out of the car by her biological father when she was on the run with Liu Bang in her early years. She witnessed the cruelty of troubled times and was not afraid of bloody killings. She was very calm when she first saw a human pig. What really broke him was learning that the victim of this tragic situation was Mrs. Qi.  Hou Lu's deep motivation: Empress Lv has all the power, but Liu Ying seems to be obedient, but in fact she has her own opinions and is difficult to control. Empress Lu first poisoned Mrs. Qi's son, King Zhao Liu Ruyi, Liu Bang's most valued prince who had almost replaced Liu Ying as the throne, in order to test the princes and kings everywhere.  The key to mental shock: The torture of Mrs. Qi was a severe torture that took several days. This incident happened in the palace. As the emperor, Liu Ying had no knowledge of the whole process, and everyone in the palace deliberately concealed it. At this moment, he suddenly realized that the palace was no longer under his control, and all the attendants around him turned to Empress Lu. Mrs. Qi is a human being who has been tortured, and she is a "spiritual human being" who cannot see, speak, or resist.  Final outcome: The huge mental shock caused Liu Ying to completely give up on government affairs and confessed that she no longer wanted to be emperor. From then on, she drank heavily, indulged in self-indulgence, and died early.  Extension of reality: the modern reflection of the "spiritual human pig". The control methods of Empress Lu correspond to the strong controlling personalities in various groups today: these people cannot accept other people's independent ideas. Once they have conflicting opinions, they will continue to deny and isolate the other party and magnify all the other party's faults; they often ridicule and suppress people in public, deliberately embarrass people in public, and continue to be mentally suppressed for a long time; in this environment for a long time, people will doubt themselves and become cowardly and inferior, just like Liu Ying back then, who became a mentally imprisoned human pig. Finally, we think about it and distinguish three types of roles: the abuser who performs mental suppression, the victim who suffers the harm, and the bystander who looks on with cold eyes, leading the audience to reflect on their own identities in similar relationships.

2026.7.27 Sunday After finishing Black Moonlight, I felt depressed (the stamina was too great, I felt like crying). Fortunately, the ending is good. As long as Jinsu is happy, I will be happy. Jinsu must always be happy! 😭