Don't You Dare Disrupt My Studies!

I love every article and every character I write, I just said that I really love them. I have [never] mentioned any words about black history, and I have absolutely no such attitude. I do not think any book is black history. I treat every article and every character with my heart and sincerity. I have expressed my strange attitude towards many background settings, I have ridiculed the setting of grading children, and denied the setting of the power of words. My writing of this setting really does not mean that I endorse it. My setting is that due to the disparity in status between men and women, a large number of female insects have turned into neutral chaos. The society has become repressed and distorted, and the unprotected male insects are sold as goods. What I want to write is that under this background, abnormal repression will definitely lead to the trend that will eventually transform into this, and then in such a crumbling and collapsing environment, the story of the attack and the enemy, and the story of them smashing the world. I [didn't know] the sensitivity of this setting, and I didn't figure it out in advance. This is a serious mistake on my part, and it's my fault. But please allow me to say something. I really want to explain that I chose this without knowing the premise, just like I chose to smash the unreasonable world backgrounds above. The response I was asked was this: The theme of the previous book was "Give the Golden Finger to the Attacker and the Recipient". The main character, Dou Xiangfang, was one of my XPs, so I wrote such a story. The genre of this book is "being chased and loved", and it is my xp that the protagonist is so doting on the protagonist. I can guarantee that this book will not cause any discomfort to you. I am not an author whose character design will collapse. If it collapses, I will refund the money in full. I will refund as much as you paid, okay? I have always said this, and I have always said this to the comments that questioned me under the old article. I have always said this, and I can't help but hope to communicate well with everyone. What I want to express is "I am sure of my ability to control the direction of the article and conform to the setting of this book." And the sentence "there is a situation that makes you uncomfortable" is because the quarrel between readers mentioned above "will you refund the author's money if this happens?" All my responses followed this sentence. I didn't think too much or think through it at the time. This is my fault. In the past, I would always say, I really want to write this book, please give me a chance. The origin of this habit is my bad habit. I can't help but want to prove something. The more I prove, the worse it gets. I am not trying to please anyone. In the last book, I also clearly said, "This book is all about attacking favors and receiving favors." In my eyes, this is a setting, not a position. I never thought that this would become a position. I never specifically loved or hated them based on their position, I just loved my characters, I just loved them. I always have a naive fantasy. If my friend, you really spend some time with me, you may know what kind of person I am, and maybe you are willing to take a look at what I say instead of believing those words that are not entirely true. You may know that I will collapse, I will be stressed, and I will do stupid things, but I will not quibble. As I write this, I begin to worry whether you will think that what I have said is all quibbles. I just thought that maybe someone is waiting for me to respond, maybe someone is waiting for me to make it clear. If I try to say something clearly, it can make some friends who have been together sincerely less painful, then I will finish it. I won't write anymore, there won't be a small one, and I won't write another big one, don't worry.

Why are you asking for a refund? Haven't you read this article? Don't you see the story in your head? Haven't you been moved by Brother Jian and Xiao Shiyi? You have already taken this relationship as your own, are you trying to get the money back for free? Who is disgusting? Disgusting yourself? Since you have already started to pressure the author without hesitation and ask for a refund, you must have deep feelings for this article, so the feeling of pursuing it all the way before is true. You also like Brother Jian and Xiao Shiyi very much, so why are you doing this? The happiness you buy with money is real, and the emotion is real. Even if you refund the money, will your happiness and emotion be returned in full? No, the feelings are your own, and you have already made them your own. You want money, you want love too. Is that so? I once encountered a melon. A male idol posted a blog to do charity. Fans rushed to buy the villagers' dishes, helped him increase his reputation and then refunded the money (this is roughly what it means). Those fans did the charity because of the male idol, rather than volunteering because the charity was meaningful or beneficial to them, so they eventually refunded the money. But we are not. We have cried and laughed for these characters. I like them very much and I am willing to pay for them because I have gained happiness from them. I should pay for them because it is a fair trade. I have to pay for them, this is what my morality requires me to do. Just taking me as an example, I buy the articles I like when I see them, usually as many as I read. If I encounter a plot or development that I don't like very much, I might give up on it. When the plot upsets me or makes me uncomfortable, I will stop reading this book and move on to the next one. No negative points, no bad reviews, no refunds, because I have actually watched the previous plot. It has entered my mind and been absorbed by me. This plot now belongs not only to the author, but also to me, and I am responsible for it. What's special is seeing some of the author's articles written without thinking. Maybe it's not the subject matter that I like in the end, but it must be the writing style that I like. It's the warm or joyful writing style that I like. I like the tenderness in her words, and I am willing to take responsibility for it. So, I just want to say, did you buy voluntarily before, do you still like Brother Jian and Xiao Shiyi now, and are you still willing to take responsibility for the transactions you made?

If you have different opinions, please leave a separate comment. Don't say it under my comment. I said it once before finishing the rating. I will say it again here. After reading everything, it is all settled. First, it does not violate the law. Second, it does not violate morality. Third, it does not squeeze the living space of other articles. In recent years, all circles have begun to become fan circles. I miss it very much. The peaceful and friendly environment of the past few years has been cleaned up without knowing what it is. It has become more and more smoky. I just said this is a special offer. If I hadn't searched for it when I saw it, I wouldn't know what it meant. It's strange that everything has to be given a special name now, and many things have nothing to do with it. Okay, basically I don't read any type of Zerg, but I occasionally read a few books. I don't understand what the author would do if he wrote it. There were so many bloody stories in the past, no matter if they were BL or BG, like forced torture, kidney removal, car accidents, etc. They were all there, and I didn't see so many people talking about inequality. Besides, if you look at this Zerg special confession, there are no ancient novels. They are all about feudal imperial power. There is no equality between human beings. Personally, I am a protagonist who controls or even suffers, but I don't really like to talk about attack, control and control. Could it be that I prefer to receive, so I can't like to attack? What's the point? It's not so clear whether black is black or white. There's also the matter of refunding the money. Didn't I just spend it just to read this novel? It's just this one. Is it because it's this author that I ordered it all without even reading it? Who didn't buy it when they thought it was well written? If you didn't think it was good then why not withdraw now? I think it's the same as what happened at the Heilongjiang Ice and Snow World last year. Some people just want to mess with it. There is absolutely no need for the author to be like this in this matter, no matter what He, as long as it does not violate legal ethics and maliciously squeeze other creative living spaces, I support creative freedom. I hope the author can see this and not let this matter affect him too much. As for withdrawing from the industry now, I support it. I will also support if he wants to come back in the future. Live a good real life.

I have never read this book, nor any of this author's books, but I accidentally learned about the author. After almost understanding the whole thing, I want to subscribe to this book and say something. Some people should not be too shameless. I don't know what the obscene and dirty attitude of people who clamor to unsubscribe is, but I am really shocked that something like this will happen. 1: The author is not your exclusive property. 2: The author has never made a promise to only write anything. Three: The pen is in the hands of the author, and the author can write whatever he likes. The author is willing to refund the money, but he is completely scared by the rubbish. Why can't some people understand that the relationship between the author and the reader is equal, within the law, and not subject to anyone's control? The author writes that if you subscribe, you can read it if you like it. If you don't like it, just click out. It's that simple. The author is not digging up your ancestral graves, nor is he holding a knife to your neck to force you to subscribe.

Today I was re-reading the articles I had read before and accidentally saw your story. I am really annoyed by those labels of control. Obviously, there were no such labels before. I don't understand why it is like this now. I just ignore it. However, as long as it does not break the law, spread rumors, or violate red lines, writing is free [crying]. It's really funny. I saw on Weibo that people can actually substitute offense and suffering into the equality of men and women. Can you please please be gay? Regardless of whether you are an attacker or a PT, they are all of the same gender. Wake up, we are gay or maybe bi. Of course, I do not deny that there are gay people who watch themes about their own sexual orientation, but what I want to say is that although we have taken on a certain party's perspective, please remember that you are not him. Don't be assimilated by the character. Instead, you should analyze the character and characteristics of the character, and don't be too obsessed. When you fall in love with a character, you can appreciate the character's good qualities and explore his shortcomings, but please don't be infatuated or hurt him. It's because there are too many people who are obsessed with that the novels have become extremely fandom-oriented. Alas, I miss the days when there were plot analysis bosses. I'm a bit stupid and often need the bosses in the comment area to leave comments [crying] [crying] [crying]

Author, I don't know if you will see it, but I still want to tell you. To be honest, I am not a reader who has followed many of your articles, but I can feel in your words that you are a very gentle and delicate person who is very passionate about writing. In fact, I really don't support you writing about the Zerg race. The audience it cultivates is completely different from ordinary readers, so that most readers, including myself, will avoid authors who have written about this setting. Once they touch this setting, they will inevitably start a fight. But after reading your post, I feel that you are really sincere, and your intention may not be to write a special confession. Although my words are very weak, I hope you will not punish yourself in any way. I hope you will not be emotionally overwhelmed by the Internet. I hope you can clarify all your thoughts and moods. I hope everything will be fine for you now and in the future. If you really decide to put down the pen and paper and stop writing, I hope you can really find your new refuge.

Oh my god, in this day and age, there are actually quite a few people who come to withdraw their previous articles because the author has written something they don't like. Can they also withdraw what they have eaten? Isn't this because I took the money and read the article again, and it's like having sex for nothing?

I have never read this book, nor any book by this author, but I accidentally learned about the author. After almost understanding the whole thing, I want to subscribe to this book and say something. Some people are really shameless. I don't know what the obscene and dirty attitude of people who are clamoring to unsubscribe is, but I am really shocked that something like this will happen. 1: The author is not your exclusive property. 2: The author has never made a promise to only write anything. Three: The pen is in the hands of the author. The author can write however he likes. The author is willing to refund the money, but he is completely afraid of being bitten by some garbage. The relationship between the author and the reader is equal, within the law, and not subject to anyone's control. The author writes that if you subscribe, you can read it if you like it. If you don't like it, just click out. It's that simple. The author is a living person. He has not dug up your ancestral graves, nor put a knife to your neck to force you to subscribe.

Three brushes are over. By the way, some people are begging online. Don't go too far.

Do you really not know why everyone is sad and angry? I really like your writing style. The first time I met you was Shi Yilinjian. I like them very much, and there is no need to give up. This is what I liked when I started to like your writing style. I am willing to sacrifice to preserve the memories for the young couple I like. This is not because I have high morals to show my position of not having sex for nothing, but because my love for them is greater than yours, and there is no need to care what happens to you. It doesn't matter if you wear a vest, it doesn't matter if your tastes are different, it doesn't even matter if you admit it to yourself. What is unacceptable is your different attitude. If you open different vests, you should know in your heart that you are targeting completely different audiences and are incompatible. In this kind of audience conflict caused by XP taste, your attitude slips directly to one of the parties. As for other audiences of other vests, it seems to be ignored. In a tit-for-tat conflict, you favor one party and give enough promises, forgetting that the other party is also facing a "front". You have a solution. From the moment you open different vests, you can choose that the vests are not interoperable and completely independent. You can promise that each vest will operate independently to satisfy the tastes of different audiences after the vest is exploded, and ensure that there will be no uncomfortable episodes. Naturally, there will be omnivores who want to watch others. You made a promise, but only to one party. Especially when there is also the contradiction of "double standard performance". What many people are clamoring for is not their money back, but their anger and sadness at being ignored, given up, and treated unfairly. To be fair, this account and the readers of this account have brought you very little? Can their love and feelings really be picked up and put aside in the midst of a problem? Are the characters in these books really not worthy of your review? What do you think about these characters and readers after you create them? Are these loves a bargaining chip to hold you up and let you slide to the other side in the conflict? As long as you don't write about attack and control special Zerg in front of people who don't like it, readers who like you will be fine. It's normal to have hesitations about your main/subject article because you write the main/subject article. However, in the contradiction and hesitation, your commitment to one of the parties, the commitment to 0 subscribing readers, amplifies the contradiction and makes other readers feel the pain of being double-standardized in you. As for the refund of the condemned, they also wanted a promise, and you agreed. I kept thinking, you know the different audiences you face, you opened a vest and divided your accounts, do you really not know that there will be conflicts between readers of different audiences? Do you really not know that your behavior will make people feel partial and uncomfortable? If you really don't know the latter, then the readers under these vests will really laugh out loud. No one wants to feel like they are not cared about. Your writing style is so gentle and your emotions are delicate. In this farce, your tone is still the same as before. You will not speak harshly to the readers. There is nothing to blame you. You did what you chose and wanted to do. The only ones who are not decent and will not accept it are the uncomfortable readers. CPF is not about controlling the party. It even makes fun of itself by thinking that the attackers and controllers don't like you, the main ones are controlled, and they don't like you. We support any Party Controller to read the literature that suits their own taste, and accept and agree with Party Controllers to raise questions when faced with problems in the plot and character positioning. They are afraid, they are afraid that the character they like will not get the favored one, so what do I have to be afraid of? No matter what, the young couple is still the same young couple, right? Then I realized that this young couple might be the unfavored one. What cpf is sad about is that perhaps not all of his young lovers are favored by the author, but none of them are. Maybe you want to ask, why do people start to be afraid and want that kind of preference? Isn't it good to love everyone equally? Perhaps it is because, in the eyes of readers, the act of making a promise to one of the parties in a conflict is enough to explain whether there is such a preference and who it will be with. I haven't read Jinjiang for a long time, but I can't deny my liking for you. Maybe one day, I will still be attracted, click on it, read on, and find that it is your article. I may still be a reader again, and like the lovers in your writing. I will just be a passerby, click on a book, like it, read the last page, and end it. But at least it won't be now, and at least it won't be uncomfortable. Best wishes