One Sword to Seal the Immortals

This episode is a reasonable complaint. I am also a reader of this book during the serialization period. When writing it, the subject is a subject and it is a stock buying article. During the serialization period, it can also be seen that it was written according to the subject of being a heartthrob. On the emotional line, it is obvious that ylc is the attack, fhz is the support, and ylc can be seen to be the purge attack. There is no ambiguity problem, so frequently changing the perspective after the completion is very unreasonable and suspicious behavior. I think this is a bit of a scam for readers. Now I don't know what it means to switch to mutual attack. I think it should be changed back to primary and secondary, but I respect the author's wishes, so I think it's a reasonable suggestion that someone complained this time that it should be changed to multiple. I don't know what everyone thinks.

I really like the plot of this book, and Zhouzhou and Chengcheng are also very interesting. But I remember that I started chasing it from the top of the page, and the target was the main subject until the end. The author's description is also a popular subject. I don't understand why the label was changed. Although Jinjiang does not have any content below the neck, I still feel a little uncomfortable.

During the serialization period, the perspective of the popular protagonist was changed. What does it mean to switch to mutual attack after the completion?

Let me re-watch it and see that the brothers are attacking each other?

Damn, that's not right. I remember I never read Mutual Attack. How come I've ordered all of this book? ? ? People were dumbfounded when I saw it in my favorites...

This complaint is so true. During the serialization, the main article was about buying stocks that was popular among people. After writing it, it became the main article and now it has become mutual attack. How many do you want to eat? I have been following the series since I was a main sitter. I wanted to recall that I couldn't find the article and just searched for the name. Do you know how desperate I felt when I clicked on it and saw the main slut? As much as I liked it when I was chasing it, I feel so desperate now. I have a disgusting feeling that I mistakenly ate my opponent's food and was defrauded of my money. If I like it, just mark it as your main attack and mutual attack. What does it mean to defraud readers [Like]

Hair. How do I remember that this is the Lord's receiving hair?

The fact that the horse didn't fall off was really my biggest disappointment in the whole book [crying]

This should have changed the perspective several times. The account owner himself hardly reads the main text, but has an impression of what he has read. This one is on the bookshelf and is divided into folders. The account owner must have remembered correctly the serialization period. Anyway, when the account owner collected it during the serialization period, the perspective was the main one (see a girl on plq who said that when pre-collection, the target was the main one)... Since the authors have now changed to mutual attack, then treat it as mutual attack. There is no need to say who is the attacker and who is the receiver.

Can the author explain the multiple changes of perspective? My impression is that I didn't just change the perspective once. I saw someone in the comment section.