The most ridiculous thing is the author, and the arguments about three wives and four concubines and existence being reasonable are even more laughable.
Originally, when I write an article, you can write whatever you want (it's not illegal). It's up to me whether you want to read it or not. It doesn't matter whether you have three wives or four concubines, or the protagonist or even the core ideas of the worldview are eccentric.
As a result, the author's excuse to justify the contradiction with universal values in his article was to forcefully rationalize the "ancient system of three wives and four concubines" and forcefully argue that "existence is reasonable"?
If three wives and four concubines are not normal, then there is no Chinese feudalism? Who gave you such a ridiculous conclusion about your courage? Who is the effect, who is the cause, who is the foundation, and who is the performance of three wives and four concubines in feudal society. It doesn't matter how many books you have read. People who have completed nine years of compulsory education can probably figure it out. You just ignore it like this?
Do you know what existence means is reasonable? Do you know what Hegel wanted to express on page 11 of "Principles of Legal Philosophy"? You know that the word "reason" does not refer to "principle" in the universal sense, but to the more abstract "rationality", and this rationality is relative to the "reality" that he defines as "filtered out of all corrupt and disillusioned existence", and has no connection with "reality" in the universal sense.
If you had really done research and tried to share your thoughts with the world, then you would not be so frivolous and casually define something that you don't understand at all, or even use it to show your superiority over others.
Everything you think and do is disgusting.
Articles are a vehicle for collision of ideas, not a tool for you to show off your superiority and satisfy yourself.
A severely degenerated society that has children just for the sake of having children, this world view is really amazing. The most important thing is that the ending of the third-person main story is that the stallion mainly attacks NPC, and the slaves are also happy??? Wtf Has the author changed?! The writing style changes drastically in the middle. The first half is pretty good, but the second half, especially the last???? Does the second half also turn into a non-mainstream romantic style???
It was fine at first, but the more I watched, the more wrong I felt. I didn't expect it to be pseudo-orthopedics, and I felt that it was a very innocent feeling. But in the end, I didn't understand why I kept having children. I felt that as soon as the estrus period came, the waiters would come in a steady stream, and then there would be a lot of babies. I felt a little like that, but I couldn't express it.
I want to kill myself, why did I skip to the last one? When I saw the npc at first, I thought I was suffering from the npc, but then I turned out to be attacking the npc. It feels uncomfortable, sad, ah, I really want to go back to myself 10 minutes ago, and I don't even want to skip to watch it. Anyway, I know how to run when I watch the middle part.
It would take me crazy to read them all! What the hell np stallion + harem flow
That's enough. I really can't accept the world view of this article. It turned out to be an np! And it's not based on love, it's just the ancient kind of three wives and four concubines having concubines.
Last night I saw Ke Shaoyan and his eldest brother inexplicably together in the middle, and he also thought seriously about the relationship between love, ethics, and taboos. When I looked at them this morning, they were no longer brothers. What is this? The logic doesn't make sense at all. The key is, except for a few people who know that they are not related by blood, everyone else is happy to hear about it.
What's funny is that when Gong and Shou talk about "two people for life," Shou has always been committed to finding an omega husband for Gong, but Gong didn't have this tendency before. When I saw a comment about NP, I immediately looked through the catalog and read the content behind it. 30 Waiters really disgusted me.
When I saw the pregnancy in the middle, I thought it would end soon, so I endured it until I finished it (obsessive-compulsive disorder), but I didn't expect it would be so long. Thanks for mentioning the np thing in the comment area. Now I find it is disgusting. If I hit a mine, I don't know how far my diaphragm will go.
The inexplicable absence of female characters, chauvinism, objectification of omegas, coercion... I can't accept these three views, and I will disappear from the world.
How should I put it, although the world view is not correct, but overall it is a relatively smooth article. The np does feel a bit abrupt to me later, and it is not an np. It is a bit forced to solve the problem, which I cannot accept. However, the author wrote the article for his own happiness, which is understandable. There is no charge for this article. The setting may be a bit wrong, so I can explain it in the copywriter. I am not sorry to the readers. Personal comments: The author's concept is okay, and the second part is a bit interesting. I don't mean anything in particular. Please forgive me if I said something wrong and apologize to the author. I quite like this article.
I'm so angry. It's so uncomfortable for 98k. I jumped to watch. I thought I could do 1v1, but it turns out that 30 npcs are so disgusting. I don't want to sleep after 2 o'clock. I have a child just for the sake of having a child. Isn't it disgusting? I am also convinced. Smile, smile.
In fact, isn't writing just about writing what you want to write?
What are three views? We are always so self-righteous. If three wives and four concubines were not normal, there would be no continuation of Chinese feudalism or even Chinese civilization.
This Galaxy series is completely anti-brainwashing. The reality is always so absurd, and yet so absurd and righteous.
Existence is reasonable, and this reasonableness does not only mean that the result of the influence of the thing itself is the inevitability of this reasonableness.
I planned to continue writing the second part. However, it is difficult, very difficult. If the author wants to continue writing, please contact Qiyu.
The idea is to let everyone understand the future, which naturally includes solutions to many existing entanglements in reality.
We are always so self-righteous. If three wives and four concubines were not normal, there would be no continuation of Chinese feudalism or even Chinese civilization.
This Galaxy series is completely anti-brainwashing. The reality is always so absurd, and yet so absurd and righteous.
Existence is reasonable, and this reasonableness does not only refer to the thing itself. Perhaps the results brought about by its influence are the inevitability of this reasonableness.
I was going to keep writing.
The most ridiculous thing is the author, and the arguments about three wives and four concubines and existence being reasonable are even more laughable. Originally, when I write an article, you can write whatever you want (it's not illegal). It's up to me whether you want to read it or not. It doesn't matter whether you have three wives or four concubines, or the protagonist or even the core ideas of the worldview are eccentric. As a result, the author's excuse to justify the contradiction with universal values in his article was to forcefully rationalize the "ancient system of three wives and four concubines" and forcefully argue that "existence is reasonable"? If three wives and four concubines are not normal, then there is no Chinese feudalism? Who gave you such a ridiculous conclusion about your courage? Who is the effect, who is the cause, who is the foundation, and who is the performance of three wives and four concubines in feudal society. It doesn't matter how many books you have read. People who have completed nine years of compulsory education can probably figure it out. You just ignore it like this? Do you know what existence means is reasonable? Do you know what Hegel wanted to express on page 11 of "Principles of Legal Philosophy"? You know that the word "reason" does not refer to "principle" in the universal sense, but to the more abstract "rationality", and this rationality is relative to the "reality" that he defines as "filtered out of all corrupt and disillusioned existence", and has no connection with "reality" in the universal sense. If you had really done research and tried to share your thoughts with the world, then you would not be so frivolous and casually define something that you don't understand at all, or even use it to show your superiority over others. Everything you think and do is disgusting. Articles are a vehicle for collision of ideas, not a tool for you to show off your superiority and satisfy yourself.
A severely degenerated society that has children just for the sake of having children, this world view is really amazing. The most important thing is that the ending of the third-person main story is that the stallion mainly attacks NPC, and the slaves are also happy??? Wtf Has the author changed?! The writing style changes drastically in the middle. The first half is pretty good, but the second half, especially the last???? Does the second half also turn into a non-mainstream romantic style???
It was fine at first, but the more I watched, the more wrong I felt. I didn't expect it to be pseudo-orthopedics, and I felt that it was a very innocent feeling. But in the end, I didn't understand why I kept having children. I felt that as soon as the estrus period came, the waiters would come in a steady stream, and then there would be a lot of babies. I felt a little like that, but I couldn't express it.
I want to kill myself, why did I skip to the last one? When I saw the npc at first, I thought I was suffering from the npc, but then I turned out to be attacking the npc. It feels uncomfortable, sad, ah, I really want to go back to myself 10 minutes ago, and I don't even want to skip to watch it. Anyway, I know how to run when I watch the middle part.
It would take me crazy to read them all! What the hell np stallion + harem flow
That's enough. I really can't accept the world view of this article. It turned out to be an np! And it's not based on love, it's just the ancient kind of three wives and four concubines having concubines. Last night I saw Ke Shaoyan and his eldest brother inexplicably together in the middle, and he also thought seriously about the relationship between love, ethics, and taboos. When I looked at them this morning, they were no longer brothers. What is this? The logic doesn't make sense at all. The key is, except for a few people who know that they are not related by blood, everyone else is happy to hear about it. What's funny is that when Gong and Shou talk about "two people for life," Shou has always been committed to finding an omega husband for Gong, but Gong didn't have this tendency before. When I saw a comment about NP, I immediately looked through the catalog and read the content behind it. 30 Waiters really disgusted me. When I saw the pregnancy in the middle, I thought it would end soon, so I endured it until I finished it (obsessive-compulsive disorder), but I didn't expect it would be so long. Thanks for mentioning the np thing in the comment area. Now I find it is disgusting. If I hit a mine, I don't know how far my diaphragm will go. The inexplicable absence of female characters, chauvinism, objectification of omegas, coercion... I can't accept these three views, and I will disappear from the world.
How should I put it, although the world view is not correct, but overall it is a relatively smooth article. The np does feel a bit abrupt to me later, and it is not an np. It is a bit forced to solve the problem, which I cannot accept. However, the author wrote the article for his own happiness, which is understandable. There is no charge for this article. The setting may be a bit wrong, so I can explain it in the copywriter. I am not sorry to the readers. Personal comments: The author's concept is okay, and the second part is a bit interesting. I don't mean anything in particular. Please forgive me if I said something wrong and apologize to the author. I quite like this article.
I'm so angry. It's so uncomfortable for 98k. I jumped to watch. I thought I could do 1v1, but it turns out that 30 npcs are so disgusting. I don't want to sleep after 2 o'clock. I have a child just for the sake of having a child. Isn't it disgusting? I am also convinced. Smile, smile.
In fact, isn't writing just about writing what you want to write?
What are three views? We are always so self-righteous. If three wives and four concubines were not normal, there would be no continuation of Chinese feudalism or even Chinese civilization. This Galaxy series is completely anti-brainwashing. The reality is always so absurd, and yet so absurd and righteous. Existence is reasonable, and this reasonableness does not only mean that the result of the influence of the thing itself is the inevitability of this reasonableness. I planned to continue writing the second part. However, it is difficult, very difficult. If the author wants to continue writing, please contact Qiyu. The idea is to let everyone understand the future, which naturally includes solutions to many existing entanglements in reality. We are always so self-righteous. If three wives and four concubines were not normal, there would be no continuation of Chinese feudalism or even Chinese civilization. This Galaxy series is completely anti-brainwashing. The reality is always so absurd, and yet so absurd and righteous. Existence is reasonable, and this reasonableness does not only refer to the thing itself. Perhaps the results brought about by its influence are the inevitability of this reasonableness. I was going to keep writing.