Back to Before the Disaster Struck

I really cried to death. According to the logic of the rising coastline, the disaster has covered at least one-fifth of the land area, and the heroine seems to be living in the Garden of Eden, representing some upper class people enjoying exquisite life. However, the lives of at least 100 million people seem to have not caused a splash on this "beautiful coastline". The heroine has a lot of space for plug-ins. Is it necessary to be proud of living a low-key life? It's not that the heroine is wrong to do what she did, but according to the author's hidden logic, the upper class's domestication of the people includes not only religion, but also allowing foreign capital to use arms and illegal drugs to cut leeks, and indulge in luxury all day long. Even if the heroine in the previous article reported it, only one den was destroyed, and the ban continued. The disgusting setting of Mayflower has entered the national background of the article. The superstructure is corrupt and incompetent. Even arms are not banned, let alone religion? The heroine wants to live a low-key life and occasionally do a small favor with kindness. As a person with vested interests, why should she be both responsible and independent? I am a reader who followed the article from the beginning. The author's setting at the beginning is very attractive. If you write about how a low-key person lives in the end of the world, I will continue to follow it. However, I found that the whole article made me uncomfortable. It is a kind of petty bourgeois-style moaning, a social atmosphere that seems to give you hope but is rotten, and a kind of despair that human civilization will slowly disappear because of the dregs. Some people may think I am exaggerating, but the heroine is still alive, but is she completely sheltered? The male hero has a career but is completely in the background. The Social Darwinian system is full of vitality, as if due to a natural disaster, the most precious spiritual wealth and powerful vitality of human civilization have completely disappeared, and there is no hope at all. Since the society in the article feels like a gradually dying specimen, without the new forces surging under the undercurrent, without people's uncompromising efforts for human rights, people calmly accept the third-rate or ninth-rate social status, and even allow foreigners to do business that tramples on human nature in the country, the heroine's occasional anger is even more sad. The author's knowledge reserve should be very good, and your writing is also very delicate. However, as the plot of the novel deepens, your words make my spine even more chilling. Maybe it's because I saw situations like those in Ukraine and other countries. I just wanted to read the story about stockpiling, for the simple pleasure of it, but as your novel progressed, I became less and less able to treat it with an entertainment mentality. If possible, I hope the world you write can be sunnier and broader. The lives of us workers have been described with disdain, and seeing the conscience struggles and luxurious lives of the little bourgeois makes people feel even more sad. Sincere suggestions, I hope the author is doing well, thank you!

There is no need to write such a detailed introduction to the wine, right? There are some explanations in the previous article, but they are not so contradictory. There are too many introductions to wine. Although it is a free chapter, it still feels like the word count is watered down.

Alas, while talking about the stinky wine and meat of Zhumen, and the frozen bones on the road, while eating hairy crab sashimi and buying luxury goods and gems, I did nothing else. I really mean... Forget it, this novel is really completely off track. Therefore, to engage in this kind of "high-class" operation in the face of a global disaster is really an old man on the subway looking at his mobile phone and completely unable to understand what he wants to express.

Introducing various luxury goods in a natural disaster article?

My wife's article has a lot of inserted introductions. In fact, it can be simplified. If it doesn't work, it can be included in the text. If it is included in v, it will still be like this. If I spend money to buy Baidu, I may not follow it.

Is the author from Shanghai, or someone living outside the mainland, with a deep understanding of "power and power"? The article smells of capitalism in the Republic of China, or capital in Hong Kong, trying to make fun of the mainland, and it's neither fish nor fowl.

It feels like the heroine has less and less advantage. The heroine has such a golden finger and has been reborn for so long, but she still puts herself at a disadvantage. It's really amazing.

To put it bluntly, if the heroine meets someone from her father's faction, they will fight to the death even if they don't go on a killing spree. It would be better to take advantage of the first-mover advantage, hide in the dark, and give them a fatal blow when the time comes. This would preserve your own rights.

It feels like I keep talking about irrelevant things, it's too procrastinating

It doesn't mean that the heroine must save the world, but since the heroine has been reborn, she can't live more and more aggrieved. The heroine relies on the country. If the country is not good, can the heroine live well? Won't you be treated like a second-class citizen? Even if it is for your own life, you should work hard to make the country stronger and stronger.