Could You Please Stop Flirting with Me?

Who would have thought that when I was a student, I got involved in F1 because of this novel, and seven years later I went to the F1 Shanghai Station and felt the atmosphere of the stadium with roaring mountains and tsunami!

My previous comments have also been deleted, and whoever reported it knows better. How can I put it this way? I've seen many posts coming to criticize trolls, and it's been the same reason every time for several years. It's very annoying. The author has clearly made it clear at the beginning of the chapter that the Spring and Autumn Period must appear to be right and wrong. Brushwork. Hey, Caramel Winter Melon knows how to appreciate friendship, love, and like. I said if they have a good relationship, they must have an adulterous relationship. Everyone, I will fork you out. No one is forcing you to read it. The author himself has the final right of interpretation. If you insist on listening to other people's Spring and Autumn style of writing, go and watch pirated copies when you are young. Don't come here. If you like it, support it, just read the novel happily. Listening to the wind is like the rain, making you appear to be unique? If you accept the author's explanation, then continue reading. If you can't accept the author's explanation, just cancel your attention, leave, or complain to clear it up. After all, times are changing, and so are concepts. But I firmly object to you not even reading this article, but reading Mine Clearance or some Spring and Autumn Writing Style stuff, and then you come to scold the author or urinate under the novel. As if you don't have your own thoughts, you should at least really understand and express your own ideas. Even the author has given an explanation sincerely, but I really don't understand it. Do short videos affect the brain? (Guess)

The article was written in 17 years. Now, for some reason, some posts come under the author's book to give negative scores and I feel sad and can't believe it. If I hadn't read these two books many times, I almost would have believed them. Don't say I have leg hair or anything. I just come here to say it objectively and impartially using my real reading memory. Not at all. Are you playing word games with me here? Is the standard operation of Douban diversion in the fan circle a necessary process for black authors? I am reviewing the teaching materials and you are ruining it. I see that your bids are basically full orders. Yes, you have read all of this book, but what about that one? As for Xiaoxi's book, if you read it and still say that they are having an affair, I will really explode. Can you understand it completely? It is not illegal to spread rumors now, right?

At this moment, I re-read it at the 2025 Singapore F1 scene. I read it at the beginning of 2017. As a junior high school student at the time, I probably never imagined that I would be at the F1 scene eight years later. Even after so many years, this article is still very interesting.

Although I also play Douban, I don't support your behavior of posting negative comments. At least read the article before commenting. What's more, if you haven't read the article or bought it, what are you angry about?

People from DB really don't need to come and stir things up. You are only allowed to step on it and will not accept any explanations or excuses. Then just play by yourself over there, you won't find any sense of identity here! It is not fair and objective at all to exaggerate the title to let others preconceptions, then take it out of context to summarize and explain, deliberately cut off the first half but not the second half, and deliberately pick up screenshots of parts that are beneficial to you. Now readers here are disgusted with this. Then other readers who had read the two articles deliberately covered their ears and refused to accept the explanations. So what sense of identity do you come here to seek? I have read both articles, and I understand very well what the setting of the article is, and what the details of the plot are, whether they are distorted or biased, I will definitely refute you. You can't find the feeling of following you on DB here.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, Owen, what are you saying in the groom's suit? We go to the honeymoon destination of Santorini. The sun rises on the left hand and the sun sets on the right hand. What is the difference between a lifetime and a proposal? ? ! ! ? ? ! !

Some people go online and create something out of nothing. Once the radio drama is online, they will make a fuss even more. The author made it clear, "no pursuit", "no proposal", "no single-arrow relationship" Heizi said that the author was playing word games and summed up the author's words as "there is no romantic relationship"? Is it just using this summary method to pin the blame? If it is not written by the author, the summary becomes written by the author. Many people just look at the other book and say they haven't read it. They go to hearsay about it, read the title of the brainwashing package, and then come to charge. The Qing Dynasty is over, and yet you still come here to do this, so idle and panicked

This article is really touching. The last time I read it was seven years ago...

There is no impure emotion between Charles and Owen. They both share the same extreme hobbies. The two of them have reached this point after stumbling and stumbling~ Their relationship is different from the feeling that Hunter Winston brings to me. It brings me pure emotions that have nothing to do with love. I hope that they can bicker until they grow old in the third world. My baby Hunter and baby Winston who is as big as a Coke bottle live a happy life. I love you!