Lin Daiyu, a Literary Giant of Her Age

Mr. Emmmmm, forget it, what I want to say is not just a title of "Sir", this is just a superficial thing, I want to say something deeper. In fact, the author can tell that those people are leftists who are women, and their position is that leftists just happen to be the female gender. Instead of being a leftist woman, we regard the liberation of women as the foundation of the left. It is true that in reality, leftist attempts and attempts at women's liberation have failed, and even ideals have been tainted. If you mention leftism at this time, you will be laughed at, and if you mention the liberation of women, you will be labeled as an external force. But there are some people, even a large part of women, they may still dare to enjoy it. Perhaps one day, perhaps some parallel world leftist attempts may be successful, but in any case, in their eyes, women's liberation is definitely impossible to succeed. This may be because they are just leftists as women. For them, women's liberation is secondary and leftist ideals are primary. If they can only realize one, then the priority is the leftist ideal rather than the realization of women's liberation. That is to say, in their eyes, women's liberation is a condition that can be compromised at any time. Although it represents the power of half of the human race, half of the ideals among comrades, and the sacrifice of half of the partners, it is not important. Of course, not only them, but a large part of this half also think so, and small ideals can be sacrificed for the realization of big ideals. However, don't we need to ask ourselves at this time? When general ideals, the most basic ideals, are sacrificed to realize the ideal, is it really the ideal we pursue? Can such ideals gained through compromise and betrayal really be abandoned to create a new world? People who hold this idea will tell those who join with the intention of liberating women and liberating all mankind from the very beginning. Women who join, we will realize our ideals, but your ideals may not be realized. Can they be compromised and abandoned when necessary? Of course, it's possible that I'm just too excited. Perhaps the author is that kind of person, that kind of woman, who feels powerless because she is a woman and has endured all-round systematic and structural oppression, and knows that the world is built on the basis of the exploitation and oppression of one gender by another. It may be possible to curb the exploitation of the proletariat by capital one day, but it will never be possible to curb the oppression and exploitation of women by men. Therefore, as a complete defeatist, I did not hope for the possibility of realization at all, but instead placed myself on the possibility of a left victory. After all, people always have hope. However, I still say that women are the proletarians of the proletarians, the exploited of the exploited, and the slaves of slaves. As long as women cannot be completely liberated, the proletarians will not be completely liberated. As long as women are systematically exploited, the exploitative society will not stop. The Left that cannot liberate women is a castle in the air. Note: I use left to prevent harmony. The exact harmony depends on luck.

There is no doubt about the author's talent, but the title "Mr. Lin, Mr. Lin" in the extra chapter is really touching.

Speaking of Mr. In our dialect, sir refers to teachers, and junior people refers to young people. It is a beautiful contrasting phrase. I also like the title Mr. Lu Xun very much. But in modern Mandarin, I feel disgusted every time Mr. Is used to refer to men. Listening to "Mr., Madam" being called "Mr." At the airport, I always wonder if "man" is a word that cannot be spoken. And calling outstanding women sir in daily life is even more disgusting. In the evolution of the word's meaning, it has been defaulted that men are the referents of sir. Therefore, if it cannot be allowed to evolve back to its original meaning, I do not support letting sir refer to outstanding women. I like the dialect of sir, and I prefer the word lady. She is expressing her recognition and respect for women. (In daily life, I am always called young lady, which is really disgusting. When I am called madam abroad, I feel really comfortable. There is no respect for women at home.)

After reading the synopsis, the male protagonist and the relationship line are really stuck in my throat. I feel that the class and structure have been lost since the male protagonist appeared. This male protagonist represents the interests of the bourgeoisie and is destined to part ways. There can be a relationship line, but it would be much better if they separated in Taixi because of different ideas. However, because love still comes to the Central Plains, it will be a big failure. Then it will be the same as a romance novel full of love first. It should not be the grade of this book.

Damn it, everyone in the synopsis is crazy, all my friends are dead, it's so tragic

I wish I could write it down, but the outline is full of ups and downs and turbulent waves.

I think it would be better without a male protagonist. Daiyu goes deep into the bottom to explore and slowly find the path of gcism. In the following chapters, after the appearance of the male protagonist, I feel that Daiyu's character creation is no longer three-dimensional. The descriptions only stay on the surface and do not go into the essence of her character. Moreover, her inner spiritual world has not grown, and she has lost her autonomy and self-awareness. I want to ask where Daiyu's fighting spirit against all injustice is. I suspect that if I continue to write this outline, the emotional line will take up a lot of space and become a romance novel.

Well, in the future like this, I still believe that the word sir can return to its original meaning. Not just any man can be classified as a gentleman. In this context, it seems that there is nothing wrong with using the word sir. However, when you read an article, you cannot just read the background of the article, which is completely divorced from the reality of life. Considering our current situation, it is really unpleasant to read "Mr. Lin". Maybe you can consider using Lin Xiaoxiang's nickname instead?

The more I read, the more I felt that it would be impossible to finish this book with more than 100 chapters. Sure enough, the only spiritual food I had left was the cold outline.

Writing according to the outline is quite good, but for the success of the Central Plains revolution, it is best not to have foreigners as commanders, well...