A Philosophy Nerd's Dream of Debauchery

But my question is, what is freedom? How can we define what we want to do, or what we don't want to do? What exactly do we want to pursue? I sometimes feel that some things, such as what we want to do, are defined by what we can do. Our experiences define our thinking to a certain extent, and therefore define our tendencies. This does not mean that it is necessarily bad to "establish a mind for heaven and earth, and a destiny for the livelihood of the people", nor does it mean that it is necessarily good to follow one's own path. If you insist on following your own path and your own opinions, you will eventually fall into the void of meaning. In some respects, establishing a mind for the world and the people is very similar to one of the ways that Western thinkers explored the future after Nietzsche announced the death of God. This branch feels that the meaning of an individual's life lies in dedication to the group. Shen Yan's goal is to be a dandy, but if we look into the meaning of being a dandy, he is still at a loss. I don't know if the protagonist has his own meaning in life. If so, I hope he can show it better... After all, I lack a meaningful spirit... Orz

There are many things in this world that cannot be explained clearly, not to mention that the unlucky brother's thoughts might leak out if he turns around. (Face covering

There must be something wrong with this brother. He once praised his sister for knowing how to use a pseudonym, and then immediately asked her to change her name back to her original name. This is a confusing operation.

Stop now. I feel that the author's concepts and angles are quite interesting. It doesn't seem like a mindless short story. My mind is still out there and I haven't come home yet. I'll come back and read it when he gets home.

No problem, what you said is correct, but understanding is different from understanding. As you said, everyone can understand, but everyone can understand, which is different from people, such as you, who think and think this way in their bones. Sometimes even if you agree, you probably don't understand.

After reading the first chapter and studying the comments, I felt strange. It wasn't that I disliked the article, but I felt that the protagonist's ideological realm was too high and inconsistent with his own. It also seems to be a tragedy. I saw some comments saying that the team was wiped out at the end. WTF! I still like sweet articles. Is QAQ really a tragedy?

This person who studies philosophy must be the author himself. I am thinking about it, thinking about it, and the dead memory is attacking me.

"Retreat" is a big thorn in the side of the author~ push

The protagonist is a bit controlling 233

If my brother wants to hide in the flower house properly, someone must die...