The Ghost Mother's Book of Horror Stories

After reading the comments downstairs, I said I have never played that game, and the author also stated in advance that he had a reference. From the current point of view, I don't think this is plagiarism, but it is indeed not original. It should be said to be a derivative or a second modification. But there are also comments downstairs that are very confusing. There is no defensible reason for plagiarism. Plagiarism is shameful and wrong. Plagiarism will hurt the creative desire of the original author. When plagiarism becomes popular, the living space of originality will be infinitely squeezed, resulting in fewer and fewer good originals. Borrowing settings and paying homage are not considered plagiarism because the source of the original work is clearly marked. As for plagiarism, it's all because of hard work. The original author spent several times on the idea of ​​the setting, but the plagiarizer silently claimed that it was original and used it. Who will feel sorry for the original author? ? ?

Ahhhhhh! So beautiful!

This is probably the most bland horror novel I have ever read, just like a fairy tale, bland. And it's really short

Hahaha, this is an interesting fairy tale

Anticlimactic. But it's pretty good-looking

Is this considered bad QAQ? The ending was revealed too quickly, right?

Ah, it feels like a fairy tale

I would like to ask if the author has any other vests? I also want to see the follow-up

Wow, it's good to watch, but the ending is a bit confusing_(:зゝ∠)_But I like the story very much, and the author is very suitable to be a storyteller~\\(≧▽≦)/~

It's funny, my comment was deleted? ? You respect yourself and write stories that completely copy G5 games, and you still want us to pay to watch them? ? ?