Witness Loop

With my intelligence, I would watch it ten more times!

I don't understand, it's so embarrassing.

Isn't that policeman a witness? I don't understand_(:з)∠)_

It's the result of suggestion. Murphy's law, whatever, what's possible will definitely happen. . . I feel like this article is great.

The author's ideas are great! ! ! I really like this weird and morbid article! !

After watching it for the third time, I seemed to have discovered something again... There was something wrong with that policeman, and the hint was very obvious. The behavior of the police in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd lines is completely different. The witness is a policeman, the investigator is also a policeman, and the final arrester is still a policeman. From the frontline point of view, he is the witness, the 3rd line says that he is a substitute witness, and the policeman in the 2nd line says that you will know later... This timeline is messed up. After sorting it out, the police's timeline should be 312.

I understood it after reading it twice. . . . . . The author is really imaginative. To put it simply, it can be divided into three lines: 1Three years ago 2 doctors and police witnessed the scene together 3Three years later. Starting from 3, the doctor and his brother-in-law seem to have mistakenly entered a time field. The time field is three years ago, when the doctor killed his brother-in-law, and witnesses in the normal time period saw everything (it cannot be ruled out that the witnesses came three years later), so they went to the police, but the murder scene had been moved to the second line, but the doctor and the police were together at the time, so the suspicion was eliminated, so the doctor in the third line was not worried that he would be the murderer.

I don't understand,,,,,,