Zhang Wuhen

Were these conversations two years ago?

It's been 13 years, is there anyone left?

After being ignored for several days, I finally got an article. Thank you very much for your recommendation! □□ It's a good article, but it's a pity that it's not to my taste (I don't really like martial arts, sorry orz) The writing style and era research are pretty good, so I decided to look for Juju's other articles to have a look =3=

The writing is very tasteful, come on! Here's a little suggestion: Try to have as many words as possible in each chapter, at least 3,000 words. This will be very helpful for points~

I have always been curious about how this story will end~ I hope the author will finish writing it soon^_^Author's reply: Haha, it's finished now

Ma Boyong's writing is indeed brilliant, but I don't like his "historical conspiracy theory" either. Fortunately, he writes articles and does not give lectures on TV. The six departures from Qishan did not have great strategic significance. They were just efforts to implement the ideal of "Northern Expedition to the Central Plains" - this is just for those behind. In terms of attacking cities and plundering territory, the impact on Wei's overall strength cannot be seen here. If that's all it is, it really means nothing. For example, as far as ordinary people are concerned, they probably don't care about the revival of the Han Dynasty. I believe there were fewer angry youths at that time than now. As for the passage I quoted, I admire Ba's digging in depth, but it seems that he dug in the opposite direction to me... Actually, what I mean is that Wu Zhang doesn't need to be so sad. In some things, it may take many years to realize the difference. Are you interested in guessing who the person mentioned in this passage is? (Of course, if..., Then...)

Khan, I am not a person who writes about things, so I write more casually. In terms of writing and teaching, the most satisfactory one is probably Wang Meng's "Forgetting Each Other in Jianghu". I don't know what I think of it.

Yes, I forgot some wonderful articles. Ma Boyong's "Jie Pavilion" is breathtaking, but it cannot be refuted by official historical records. Sigh: Even if it is fiction, at least it makes sense in theory :) However, Ma Boyong also wrote "The Wind Rises in Longxi", which I thought was even better, with a wonderful spy war and Mr. Kong Ming who controlled everything behind the scenes! Also, Qing Mei's "Twenty-Seven Years" made me feel very sincere and touching. Danmei Kong Ming, I can't do it. To be exact, I'm not interested in Danmei yet:)

Liuwan, my comments are a bit more straightforward, please don't take offense. "There are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand readers." The image of Kong Ming in everyone's mind must be different. Probably because I have loved reading history since I was a child, I am particularly "real" about works involving history. For example, when I was watching TV, I was very unhappy that Kong Ming already had a beard when he came out of the mountain. Zhou Yu was so young and handsome. Obviously Kong Ming was only twenty-seven during the Battle of Chibi, and Zhou Yu was already thirty-three-four, so he was already an old man:) And from the text comparison of "Three Kingdoms", Kong Ming's appearance is definitely more handsome:) In addition, because I have always believed in "letters convey the truth", I pay special attention to the original intention. As for "Ode to Kong Fansen" and the like, I don't think it was written well. Good literary and artistic works should have the power to speak directly to people's hearts. In the final analysis, great men are still human beings, and they also have emotions, mistakes, and shortcomings. If they are "high and complete", they will not look like real people. The reason why great men are different from ordinary people is that they overcome the weaknesses of ordinary people and make extraordinary choices when facing fate. Basically, if both points are expressed well, it will naturally have the power to move people's hearts. For example, a character like Kong Ming deserves the title of "hero". As for Cao Cao, I think he cannot be called a "hero". But in terms of achievements alone, how can Kong Ming compare to Cao Cao? The most valuable thing about Kong Ming is that he established an "Utopia (the politics of Shu is the clearest among the Three Kingdoms)" in troubled times and gave the people hope. The second is that he "knew what was impossible and did it." The so-called "six outings to pray for mountains", although there was no failure, did not have great strategic significance, but he still worked hard to implement the ideal of "Northern Expedition to the Central Plains". The ancients said that "the most important thing is to establish virtue, and the second is to perform meritorious service." Kong Ming's value lies in not succumbing to reality and constantly improving himself. This is similar to Westerners' definition of a hero as a person who fights against irresistible fate.

"The people loved him so much that during the funeral no one thought he should be mourned, because they were sure that he was originally a god and had now returned to heaven. Finally, before the funeral was held, it was said that the senators and ordinary people, instead of sitting apart, sat together - empty Unprecedented - hailing him is like hailing a kind god. "I strongly agree. Kong Ming is the kind of person who can be respected by enemies and friends, temples and rivers and lakes. He may not be perfect, but he has reached the ultimate level of human wisdom, courage, and action.