←[Blurb you can ignore]:
A student named Lin Yan, who has nothing to do all day and is bored out of his mind, falls for Su He, the older brother of his classmate Su Fan. From then on, he won't leave Su He alone. Lin Yan and Su Fan are bitter rivals, and Su He is caught between the two: his younger brother on one side, and an annoyingly precocious kid who keeps clinging to him on the other.
Their romance began as an act of revenge. Lin Yan has his reasons for pursuing Su He, but Su He, unaware of the truth, takes their relationship seriously. But how could the feelings he invested be fake? Young Lin Yan doesn't know any better, but what about when he grows up...
This is an older-bottom story with a younger top. The top is a beauty, the bottom is an uncle. No need to doubt it: there will be no role reversal.
Plenty of couples and drama, so bring your spoiler shield.
Complete.
New story introduction: click the image to go straight there.
Please support me by visiting my profile!
I'm off~
Premise:
What I find most incredible is that Su He's outlook on life is also distorted.
LEO said he was giving, but Su He actually agreed? ? ! ! ~~Please, designing, framing, isolating and creating conflicts for your own selfish desires, is this called giving? ? ? To give without any selfish desires, to be happy for the happiness of others, to be sad for the sadness of others, and to make others happy even if you are sad is called giving! ! ~The last part when you sing for your love rival can be called giving, but the previous ones cannot be called giving.
LEO's brain circuitry is really outstanding
I have never understood how LEO's outlook on life is so long. He is clearly trying to harm others, but he can still confidently say that he is paying for it. Those who really give will cry. It is obvious that Xiao Shou is the one who always gives. Giving care and love is also giving, and it is more than 100 times more noble than LEO.
Will a child give away 1 million in revenge? Idiot!
The extra chapter choked me to death. It's a pity that I can't see Su Fan anymore.
Learn from the classmates above and score points (mainly because it's almost over and my conscience has discovered it.)
Where have all those old readers gone? There is little motivation if there are few people discussing it.
Why do I have two collections of this article in my favorites? Except for the copywriting, there seems to be no difference. Is this because of editing? In addition, could the author tell you whether there have been any changes in the previous content after the overhaul of this article? I am considering whether to read it again or pick up where it left off.
Wow, Cinderella Theater! Quite funny, hahaha~
Yeah! Reunion! But it seems that there is another misunderstanding. Good things come in hard times, alas...
What I find most incredible is that Su He's outlook on life is also distorted. LEO said he was giving, but Su He actually agreed? ? ! ! ~~Please, designing, framing, isolating and creating conflicts for your own selfish desires, is this called giving? ? ? To give without any selfish desires, to be happy for the happiness of others, to be sad for the sadness of others, and to make others happy even if you are sad is called giving! ! ~The last part when you sing for your love rival can be called giving, but the previous ones cannot be called giving.
LEO's brain circuitry is really outstanding
I have never understood how LEO's outlook on life is so long. He is clearly trying to harm others, but he can still confidently say that he is paying for it. Those who really give will cry. It is obvious that Xiao Shou is the one who always gives. Giving care and love is also giving, and it is more than 100 times more noble than LEO.
Will a child give away 1 million in revenge? Idiot!
The extra chapter choked me to death. It's a pity that I can't see Su Fan anymore.
Learn from the classmates above and score points (mainly because it's almost over and my conscience has discovered it.)
Where have all those old readers gone? There is little motivation if there are few people discussing it.
Why do I have two collections of this article in my favorites? Except for the copywriting, there seems to be no difference. Is this because of editing? In addition, could the author tell you whether there have been any changes in the previous content after the overhaul of this article? I am considering whether to read it again or pick up where it left off.
Wow, Cinderella Theater! Quite funny, hahaha~
Yeah! Reunion! But it seems that there is another misunderstanding. Good things come in hard times, alas...