After the Mild-Mannered Professor Caught a Bad Dog’s Eye

The last two chapters of this article are hilarious because the plot is really laughable. The first is that Shou cannot solve her mother's problem and leaves her mother to blame Gong, who is not at fault. The second is that Shou cannot take the initiative to propose to Gong because of her "cowardice". And all of this is in the plot of hzc. Didn't hzc just see how the wrong party saves and pursues the other party? As a mature person, how can he pursue his lover even if he can't handle the things around him well? If Shou is timid because the proposal is formal, I would like to ask him why he wasn't timid when he entered the house and asked for a doi. Could it be that he is more casual about body relationships? If you are afraid of being attacked and won't accept it, why can't you try it over and over again? To put it bluntly, there is not enough love. Some people say that love is for both parties, and it is impossible for Gong not to express it, but in fact, since it is hzc, I hope that the wrong party will take the initiative to express it. What is the problem? I said that this is not a cool article. Did you read the copy once? It is written as [dog-blooded cool article] Gong is very hard-hearted, in fact? Some people have a high degree of acceptance and feel that it is okay to accept this level, but please do not label those who cannot accept it as "extreme". Please discuss the matter as it is. Don't use [what identity] you think the reader is to refute. Please directly refute the arguments. As for the last chapter, the funny thing is that the whole text has the same diss. Girls don't want to marry Shou because who wants to marry someone who does "0" (original text). I want to say that even if a girl is unwilling to marry him, it is also because he is not heterosexual and has nothing to do with 0. Can he be married if he is 1? In reality, I rarely see girls discriminate against each other because of who they are, so I don't understand the meaning of this paragraph. Moreover, 1 and 0 are essentially body positions. If it is 0, it will be ridiculed. I don't understand the meaning. At least in the current development of social civilization, I think people are very receptive and will not laugh at you because of this. They will use zero shame as payment instead of actually paying with various actions. Does it mean that the posture is more noble? I don't think we should be position shamed.

The last chapter is really a bit embarrassing. Where did 0 suffer the loss? I really want to sacrifice the whole world [covering my face and crying]

I don't understand why you should give up your decency over this matter. Crematorium was written by the author, Shuangwen was also written by the author, and the offensive action was also written by the author. The final result was that the crematorium was over, and Shou couldn't even make it in time to propose. In the end, he could only add to himself that it was all because Gong was too good, and all because he wanted to beg, so it was a fact that you gave such a good Gong such a flying Shou, and you clapped your hands and applauded, saying that it was indeed the case. The crematorium is thinking about how to let Shou take the initiative to change for the better and move Gong Yi, but here, Lei Lei lets Gong Yi propose. Lei Yi did 0 for love, which made people laugh.

I found out before I could finish reading that the author was leaving, which was a pity. You are right, the writing is also very good, it is a pity not to write anymore, but it is indeed difficult to maintain the passion for creation in this environment. Who gave some people the power to interfere with the freedom of authors at every turn, forcing them to express their opinions, draw clear boundaries, and raise flags? The only identity on this platform is the reader. It has nothing to do with you except reading articles. Is it difficult to understand whether you like to read or not? Are you stalking your enemies every day to engage in bullying? Once again, readers can only decide what they read and not what others write. How many times have the authors been forced to quit by repeatedly pestering them in the past few years? In the future, more and more people will not dare to write. There is room for this creative environment to get even worse. I wish the author a happy life and don't deny your abilities easily. Just because this road is difficult does not mean that all the previous roads were wrong. Thank you for your story.

I don't understand what the mentality of the person who keeps scolding the author in the comment section is? Author, don't trust that kind of person. You are free to write or not to write whatever you want. Don't be coerced by anyone or anything. As long as it's not copywriting fraud, it's upright. You don't have to say sorry to the readers. If you use things other than the article to criticize, who cares except for the people who are in the circle? I don't know what black material you have, and I don't care. I only care about whether your writing is the type I like. I believe there are many silent readers like me, but I also respect your choice. But I still want to say that your choice at this moment does not mean anything. No one stipulates that if you decide not to write now, you will not be able to write again for the rest of your life. There are divorced and remarried people. Are those people going to laugh at remarried people as a shameful and hateful thing? I hope that when you are in a better mood and find happiness in writing again, you will be able to think of the majority of us who read the article silently, rather than the few fleas jumping up and down. By then, whether you write or not will be up to you. If you don't write, I have no right to accuse you of cowardice. If you write, I have no right to accuse you of repetition. You must know that your temporary words are not an imperial edict or contract, and changing your orders day and night has nothing to do with others. I wish you a smooth life and happiness every day [red heart]

Some people in the comment area shouldn't be so violent. If you don't like the author, you don't have to read it. There's no need to insult the author so much and hit readers with xp, ugh. . Let's discuss the matter

Maybe you are happy to write rubbish plots to take revenge on readers. Please stop doing sit-ups.

Hahahaha, I forgot where I saw this sentence: Love is something that can only be enjoyed by the stupidest and the wisest, and nothing in between. After going through such hardships, I wish them to indulge in the love of wisdom.

Don't think about anything and have a good rest. Summer is so beautiful, don't be unhappy, you have done a great job and are very serious and responsible. Now that I have decided to let it go, let the past go with the wind, whether it is speculation or insult, it will not matter if I don't write it down [Fireworks]

In fact, I think the teacher wrote it very well. . . . . . The crematorium is also very well written, and I can feel that the teacher is very attentive. Moreover, it takes a lot of emotion to write such an article well. The teacher has done a very, very good job, so don't listen to bad comments. The after-sales service is also very good and it will be better in the future!