I want to read something similar to No Regrets. A high-quality workplace romance involving the stock market, career ambition, and romance as a supporting element. I want mature writing with profound attention to detail, intelligence, and highly capable characters 🌠🌠
🔥A high-quality workplace story. He saved the sleeping female leader. He thought it was a romance, but he didn't want to fall into a carefully set trap and fall into an unprecedented crisis. Let's see how he breaks the situation and reaches the pinnacle of life step by step.
Chapter 997 Original text: People who are good at interpersonal relationships are prone to make mistakes, because others are tolerant and will hide from you. Your mistakes cost less and there are more opportunities. On the other hand, those who do not have good interpersonal relationships will most likely die in bed. They will not make big mistakes and have no opportunities. Therefore, many celebrities choose to have bad interpersonal relationships because this is also a skill and knowledge. If you don't study it, you won't be able to do it well. If you don't do it well, it won't be good, haha. This point of view is actually quite harsh, but it does reveal a lot of truths that are too embarrassing to say in reality. Putting "getting along too well" and "prone to making big mistakes" in interpersonal relationships together, essentially means: fault tolerance = social capital × the thickness of others' filters for you. When you are very popular, everyone likes you, is willing to speak for you, and is willing to help you, your fault tolerance cost will indeed become very low. How low is it? Sometimes the mistakes you make clearly exceed the red line for ordinary people, but because "he is usually a good person", "he probably didn't mean it" and "he also has difficulties", it is diluted, rationalized and covered up. On the other hand, people who have very bad relationships, make enemies everywhere, and don't want to see anyone are like being put on a "high-power microscope" + "zero tolerance mode": • Small mistakes will be magnified ten times • Any clues will be interpreted as "it is really him" • Almost no one is willing to speak for him • Once something goes wrong, they will basically attack in groups, and it is difficult to stand up. So to put it in the extreme: • People with very good popularity → tend to "seek death" • People with extremely poor popularity → It's easy to "die if you don't seek death." Many celebrities and powerful people who really understand how to play the game actually deliberately maintain a state of "not easy to get along with", "a bit cold", "not so gregarious" and "unfathomable". It's not that they don't know how to be a good person, but they have calculated their accounts and know that living a life that "everyone thinks is okay, but few people feel particularly close to" is actually the most cost-effective protective color. Because this way you can retain enough resources and opportunities without destroying yourself due to excessive tolerance. So your last sentence "It's better not to be a good person" actually touches on some very cold survival wisdom: Some people are not bad at being a good person, but they have clearly calculated the cost of being a good person, and finally choose to practice the craft of "being a good person" to the delicate position of "just enough not to break the rules, but never to make people feel that they owe you a favor." Quite ironic, but also quite true. Strategic alienation of interpersonal relationships: an interdisciplinary analysis based on economics, game theory and Adlerian psychology, supplemented by examples of historical figures Abstract In social dynamics, the quality of interpersonal relationships will significantly affect an individual's risk-taking behavior and tendency to make mistakes. This article explores a counter-intuitive idea: excessively harmonious interpersonal relationships may reduce the cost of making mistakes, thereby increasing the probability of major mistakes; while deliberately maintaining distant or tense relationships can serve as a protective mechanism to prevent major mistakes (albeit at the expense of some opportunities). This article combines economics (focusing on moral hazard and cost-benefit analysis), game theory (emphasis on strategic equilibrium and reputation management), and Adlerian psychology (focusing on social interest and inferiority compensation) to analyze this phenomenon. It uses historical figures such as Niccolò Machiavelli, Queen Elizabeth I, and Isaac Newton as examples to illustrate how intentional interpersonal distance can be used to reduce risks and preserve power or intellectual pursuits. Keywords: interpersonal relationships, moral hazard, game theory, Adlerian psychology, historical figures Introduction People usually regard good interpersonal relationships as the cornerstone of success and happiness, but it may inadvertently create an environment conducive to making mistakes. As pointed out in some informal discussions: People with excellent relationships will have their mistakes covered up or rationalized by others' high tolerance, and the cost of personal mistakes will be greatly reduced; conversely, people with poor relationships will face extreme magnifying glass scrutiny, limited opportunities, and the space for major mistakes will be compressed. This dynamic implies a strategic choice: some outstanding people do not know how to behave, but settle accounts and actively choose "bad relationships" as a self-protection technique. This article uses an interdisciplinary perspective to analyze: economics quantifies incentives and risks, game theory models strategic interactions, and Adlerian psychology explores the roots of motivation. Historical cases provide empirical support for the theory. Theoretical Framework Economics: Moral Hazard and Cost-Benefit Analysis From an economic perspective, interpersonal relationships can be regarded as a kind of social capital, which will change the incentive structure of behavior. The concept of moral hazard originates from insurance economics and refers to one party's increased risk-taking behavior because others bear the consequences (Pauly, 1968). In a network with excellent connections, loyalty and emotional filters form a "safety net", and the cost of errors is externalized (friends help cover up and rationalize it), which is equivalent to "error insurance" for others. Let the cost of making a mistake be C_m. In high-tolerance networks, C_m is significantly reduced, resulting in a lower threshold for risky behavior. Mathematically, if the expected utility of an action is EU = p \cdot B - (1-p) \cdot C_m (p is the probability of success, B is the benefit), reducing C_m will push individuals to choose more high-risk actions. In contrast, in a relationship-distancing environment, C_m is substantially increased by harsh external consequences, inhibiting errors but also limiting opportunities. Some celebrities or leaders therefore proactively reduce investment in relationships: when the marginal costs of maintaining rapport outweigh the benefits, they choose to distance themselves to minimize the collapse caused by moral hazard. Game Theory: Strategic Equilibrium and Reputation Management Game theory views interpersonal relationships as repeated games. In the prisoner's dilemma, excessive closeness encourages cooperation but also increases the risk of betrayal (Axelrod, 1984). High relationship quality reduces the penalty for defection, potentially leading to a suboptimal equilibrium in which mistakes (defections) are rampant. The reputation game further explains: Maintaining a "mysterious" and "elusive" image can prevent others from taking advantage of you. Under Nash equilibrium, the "alienation strategy" avoids the "fool's gain" in the trust game. In repeated trust games, excessive friendliness can easily lead to betrayal, while deliberate alienation implements a "cold trigger" strategy: any offense will lead to severe retaliation, thus stabilizing behavior and reducing the incidence of errors. This is also consistent with evolutionary game theory: in high-risk environments, "hawkish" (hard-distancing) strategies are often better than "dovish" (over-cooperation) to prevent chain collapse caused by over-investment in relationships. Adlerian Psychology: Social Interest and Compensatory Mechanism Alfred Adler's individual psychology emphasizes "social interest" (Gemeinschaftsgefühl) - a sense of contribution to the community, which coexists with the pursuit of a sense of superiority to overcome a sense of inferiority (Adler, 1927). Excessive good interpersonal relationships may lead to dependence: individuals compensate for low self-esteem through external recognition, reduce self-responsibility, and increase error rates. Excessive tolerance of others becomes a "coddling crutch" that hinders the development of what Adler called the "creative self." In contrast, distant relationships force individuals to internally compensate: energy is directed towards personal excellence rather than social harmony, and avoidance of mistakes is achieved through a high degree of self-reliance. Adler regarded this isolation not as a pathology, but as a lifestyle in which some people prioritize completing "life projects" rather than "a sense of belonging" (Lebensstil). Deliberate alienation can thus be viewed as an advanced adaptive strategy to prevent the neurotic mistakes of being "spoiled" while cultivating the courage to face life's challenges alone. Analysis: The double-edged sword of interpersonal relationships. Combining the three major disciplines, the optimal relationship strategy is highly dependent on the situation. In economics, a strong relationship network creates agency problems similar to those in corporate governance; in game theory, it destroys equilibrium and encourages free-riding tolerance; in psychology, it weakens Adlerian pursuit of independence. For high achievers, intentionally maintaining poor relationships minimizes the risks outlined above: high-pressure external scrutiny becomes a disciplinary mechanism, opportunities become more self-created, and mistakes are stifled early. But this requires strong inner resources, so only geniuses or powerful people can bear the cost of this "not being easy to get along with" in the long term. The folk joke "It's better not to be good at all" actually hides the cold wisdom of survival: being a human being is a science, but not being a human being can also be a higher knowledge. Historical Examples The following historical figures successfully mitigated risk and achieved long-term achievements through deliberate strategies of interpersonal distancing. Niccolò Machiavelli (1469–1527) Renaissance political theorist Machiavelli explicitly recommended in The Prince that rulers maintain an emotional distance to avoid being slighted and manipulated. He warned that too much intimacy would breed contempt, thereby increasing the risk of errors in judgment (Machiavelli, 1532). By keeping subordinates at arm's length, the monarch minimizes moral hazard—subordinates are afraid to exploit their weaknesses. Machiavelli himself chose to remain in relative seclusion after losing political power, focusing on writing rather than forming alliances, thus preserving his ideological legacy without making any major personal mistakes. This is consistent with the game theory of reputation management: alienation creates an "unpredictable" deterrence equilibrium. Queen Elizabeth I (1533–1603) The "Virgin Queen" of England deliberately remained celibate and emotionally distant to protect her throne. She rejected all marriage proposals to avoid the dilution of power by introducing foreign forces through marriage like her sister Mary I. She practiced "limited favor" rather than deep friendship at court, reducing her own margin for error while maintaining high-pressure scrutiny of others (Loades, 2003). In economics, this externalizes personal risk to the advisor; in Adlerian psychology, this compensates for the inferiority complex brought about by gender and achieves a sense of superiority through the status of a lonely monarch. Her 44-year rule has been almost free of major personal scandals, a reflection of the protective value of restraint in relationships. Isaac Newton (1643–1727) The physicist and mathematician was known for being a loner who deliberately maintained poor interpersonal relationships in order to focus on his academic work and avoid mistakes caused by outside distractions. Newton's disputes with Leibniz and others and his secluded life protected him from the pain of cooperation and betrayal, and also allowed him to carry out rigorous self-correction in the study of calculus and gravity. Adler's analysis suggested that this was compensation for the experience of childhood abandonment: a redirection of social interest toward scientific excellence. Game theoretically, his alienation prevents the risk of defection in knowledge sharing. Despite his eccentric personality, Newton's mistakes were far less than the potential "relationship errors" that ultimately established his lasting legacy. These cases prove that many great achievements in history are based on "strategic low investment" in interpersonal relationships. Conclusion This article demonstrates that although strong interpersonal relationships bring opportunities, they amplify the risk of mistakes by reducing the cost of making mistakes; conversely, deliberate alienation becomes a protective mechanism (at a social cost). Economics, game theory and Adlerian psychology jointly reveal this existential paradox. The historical practice of Machiavelli, Elizabeth I, and Newton shows that this is a feasible (albeit unconventional) strategy. Future research can quantitatively verify this through social network analysis of modern leaders. Ultimately, being bad at being a good person is sometimes the best art of being a good person.
A tea party at the Shen family's private residence was the first time the heroine faced the rules of survival in the wealthy circle. She went to the appointment as Gu Wan'an's friend, and was cautious in her words and deeds throughout the process to avoid being looked at by others. However, she was accidentally noticed by the old lady of the Shen family alone. Shen Yu of the Shen family, who had never spoken to her after the party, sent a reminder text message. The other party not only got her private number, but also saw through early that she was Gu Wan'an's tool in the circle.
Dual lines of suspense and workplace business war [Sending Hearts] Rich family portraits [Sending Hearts] There are your favorite reunions, the avoidant sober heroine and the paranoid male protagonist who plans to pursue love; the confrontational childhood sweetheart who will not be the first to bow to love; the scheming boss and Neptune's assistant who accidentally fell into the high-end game.
The beginning of the business war in the workplace + wealthy family is that the heroine returns hiding her identity and lays out a revenge game. It is said in the industry that the "Queen of the Abyss" never fails, and she thought so too, until she met Gu Yechen, the man who could talk to her in the same dimension. The powerful forces join forces and test each other, it's so enjoyable to watch! [Lick the screen][lick the screen]
Wall Crack recommends "Romantic Business"! . This novel combines urban life and the workplace superbly. The plot contains various high-energy plots one after another, which is very exciting. The character design is also outstanding, the characters are three-dimensional and full of charm. It's a very touching read, and you can immediately be immersed in the story, following the protagonist as he navigates the urban workplace. Whether you want to watch exciting plots or feel the workplace atmosphere, this is the right movie for you!
The story about the workplace in architecture is very professional. The heroine Kochi, because of the depressive life of a rigid life, sends out an invitation for love and employment to the young male protagonist. The plot is interesting!
[Master of Fooling × Sapiosexual Ceiling] As soon as Xu Zhixia opened her eyes, she transformed into a villain assistant in a commercial novel. The original owner is smart and cool, and is a business undercover carefully trained by the Xu family. He is responsible for approaching Shen Yanchuan, the leader of the Shen family, and stealing the secrets of the core project "Lingxi". But now Xu Zhixia is just a financial intern who just got the notice of regularization and can't even understand code. Faced with a screen full of project information, she decided to give up her struggle: she didn't have professional knowledge, and learning by fooling around could always save her life. As a result, many unexplainable scenes gradually appeared in the Shen Group. Assistant Xu used a hell joke to analyze the ethics of artificial intelligence, and Mr. Shen actually nodded; she described the technical report as a stock market review, and the project team actually found a new direction; she was worried about the undercover identity being exposed every day, but she didn't know that Shen Yanchuan had already seen through everything. He originally just wanted to see what the chess piece sent by the Xu family wanted to do, but later he found that watching her try to survive in the cracks was more interesting than defeating her competitors. Until "Lingxi" was successfully released, a report letter revealed Xu Zhixia's entire identity. She decisively left her resignation letter and flew to the island overnight to prepare for her retirement life. A month later, the doorbell rang. The dusty Shen Yanchuan stood outside the door, his eyes falling on Xu Zhixia holding a coconut. "The company crisis has been resolved, and the insider has been cleared." Xu Zhixia was confused: "So?" Shen Yanchuan took out the ring: "So, when will you come back with me to get the certificate?"
Passionate young lady with a fire-ash background VS a street gangster with an upright mouth and body. 🌷🌷The heroine's character is so good, she is open and unrestrained without being pretentious, she dares to act, dare to act, dare to love, dare to hate, love is subtle. 🌼🌼The male protagonist is a very responsible, considerate, action-oriented boy who is not good at words and a little shy. He is a very hard-working boy.
In 2048, brain-computer interfaces become popular and "memory banks" become national infrastructure. From the moment everyone is born, important memories are automatically backed up. Memories can be transferred, sold, inherited, or even left as legacies to future generations. Memory of Tax Refunder's Statement, No. 1024. Job content: Traveling to hospitals, nursing homes, and hospice care facilities every day, talking to people who are about to die, and helping them decide which memories can be "tax refunded."
Real Estate Industry ✌️The first event for a newbie in the workplace has his favorite celebrity! It's a pity that she died. Yes, she was assassinated in this rookie planning debut. Her idol was gone, her job was gone, she finally found a job, and a person who looked almost the same as the star was quietly approaching her? !
The male protagonist is full of cute contrasts: he is the king of hell in the foreign business world, and he is the king of harsh words towards her. If you do something but don't say it, your ears will turn red if you are exposed. · The heroine has a big heart and a quick mouth: After being given special attention by the CEO, she first doubted "whether it was a company benefit", found out the clues and did not ask further questions, but silently memorized the little book.
A new book, you can read it right from the beginning. The characters are very stable and the workplace is realistic enough. There is a feeling of happening around you.
Waves of Fortune in the Business World
16.1kReads9.2Score1.9kShelves
Workplace Cleverness
107Reads—Score—Shelves
My Flash Wedding Routine
1kReads9.0Score100Shelves
My Performance Interview Is Broadcast Live Online
2Reads8.6Score—Shelves
There Is No Winter in Shenzhen
3Reads8.4Score—Shelves
His Golden Money Orange
16.8kReads9.1Score2kShelves
I Own the System and Choose to Remain Silent.
53Reads5.8Score—Shelves
The Company Said "Cut Salary to Protect Jobs", I Counted the People Who Were Laid Off.
1Reads8.6Score—Shelves
Accounting Game
—Reads5.8Score—Shelves
Shan Shuyi's Werewolf Killing in the Workplace: from Invisible Man to Queen of Rules
—Reads8.4Score—Shelves
Capital Boss Pursues Bai Yueguang Fiercely, Willing to Be a Mistress for Love
4Reads5.8Score—Shelves
Shan Shuyi: You Can't Afford My Name
—Reads8.5Score—Shelves
I Turned the Leader's Nonsense into ASMR
—Reads8.6Score—Shelves
Now That My Relationship Has Become Popular, I Have Become a Big Shot in the Industry.
—Reads5.8Score—Shelves
I Am the Only One in the Whole Company Who Conscientiously Executes Stupid Orders
1Reads8.6Score—Shelves
The Special Prize at the Company's Annual Meeting Is Me
1Reads8.5Score—Shelves
The Company Took the Blame on Me, and I Sent Them to Jail by Broadcasting the Law.
3Reads8.5Score—Shelves
Back to the Light: the Chess Game of the Chaebol Queen
4Reads—Score—Shelves
Professor Zhou, Let's Get Married
115.2kReads9.2Score18.9kShelves
Ink Marks
6Reads—Score—Shelves
Thirty Years
12Reads8.2Score—Shelves
No Overtime Association
1Reads8.6Score—Shelves
She Relies on AI: She Tears up the Old Man in the Workplace with Her Own Hands
1Reads—Score—Shelves
Director's Workplace Thoughts
37Reads5.8Score—Shelves
Xiao Ming's Business Experience
658Reads9.2Score—Shelves
Equatorial Deep Sea
16Reads8.0Score—Shelves
Dressed as a Villain Assistant, I Was Loved by the CEO
—Reads5.8Score—Shelves
He Xu & Ren Ye
7kReads5.8Score911Shelves
Scheming Woman in the Workplace
90Reads5.8Score—Shelves
Africa's Xiwei
10Reads—Score—Shelves
Recycle Half a Lifetime of Regrets
4Reads—Score—Shelves
Lucia at the Equator
7Reads—Score—Shelves
Sales Notes from Northward: Non-Mainstream Sales Techniques
1.1kReads5.8Score425Shelves
Glossy
601Reads9.4Score137Shelves
I Gave up My Million-Dollar Annual Salary and Was Pestered by Three Big Bosses.
—Reads5.8Score—Shelves
Su Yue's Promotion Story
94Reads9.4Score—Shelves
The Ceo's Hidden Marriage Employee
9Reads—Score—Shelves
Confused at 40: Single Mothers and Broken Elites
1Reads5.8Score—Shelves
Falling Out of Control! I Was Kissed by Mr. Chu and Cried Every Night!
1.6kReads8.4Score123Shelves