Law Education: You Handle Divorce Cases and Set People Up Too?
普法：打离婚官司，还介绍对象？
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 426k Words
- Genre
- Urban
- Subgenre
- Urban High-Concept
- Updated
- 10mo ago
- Source
- Fanqie
Synopsis
189Chapters
119Reads
6.2Score
8Listens
141.7kReads · all time
More by this author
Reborn, I Took the Chinese Entertainment Industry by Storm With My Foresight
A Hundred Ghosts Roam the Night: I Devoured the Ultimate Evil Spirit!
I Told You to Revive Crosstalk, Not Become a National Treasure at Eight
Are You Crazy? A Centenarian Takes Down Fire Phoenix?
Journey to the West: I Take Sun Wukong as My Disciple and Steal Buddhism’s Fortune
They Made You a Militiaman, So Why Did You Build an American-Armed Regiment?
You're a Private Company, So Why Are All Your Contracts for Military Projects?
You Want Me Out of Wolf Fang? I’ll Wipe Out Your Special Forces!
Reborn as a Cook, He Bullies Fan Tianlei? The Team Leader Is Stunned
Stand-Up Comedy: I Was Just Filling In, So How Did I Become the Pillar of the Show?
The Madman Got Out of Prison and Immediately Tore Apart the Mercenary Headquarters!
I Set Up a Stall Abroad, So Why Are the Foreigners Calling the Police?
In booklists 2
Any Good Stories About Lawyers? I Want Exciting Courtroom Scenes
I don't want the protagonist to rely on one cheat after another to defy the odds. I want exciting debates, the kind that feel really cool. Please, please~
66Books996.3kViews16dUpdated
A Seasoned Reader in a Reading Slump, Looking for Fresh Plots
I feel like none of these books can hold my interest anymore.
80Books2.4kViews1yUpdated
Reader comments 10
Translated by Google Translate
It's pretty good, and the case didn't drag on. But I'd like to give you a small suggestion. Don't always try to catch someone's attack. It's very passive. It would be better if the protagonist can take the initiative to attack, and also create some obstacles for the enemy (personal opinion) 🤭
You can see it, but this system should not be called big data. The author does not understand the concept of big data at all. He uses big data as an accurate symbol that can collect all the experiences of a person. But in fact, big data uses a large number of samples to infer a possibility, that is, the maximum probability event. It is impossible and impossible to understand everything a person has experienced. Because big data is oriented to a collective, that is, the more samples, the more accurate it is. On the contrary, for individuals, the discrepancy will be greater. It may be said that big data promotion is to push videos or novels that you like, but that is because it is based on the actions of many, many people to infer whether you will like it. For example, after watching a for 100 people, the system recommends b to them, and the probability of continuing to watch b (i. E. Completion rate or follow-up rate) is higher than 80% or something. Then it can be judged that people who like a have a high probability of liking b. Big data does not require one person's accuracy, but the basic behavioral habits of most people
The writing is very interesting. It is different from other lawyers. I can't tell you exactly what it is, but it seems more interesting than others.
The writing is good and the content is rich. It would be nice if the plot had more ups and downs [laughter]
It's very well written, I like it. Good luck to the author.
Systematic matchmaking and popularizing the law are my favorite themes. There are skipped readings, which is nice. Completed, no similar books found. At least 9 points. Strange, why are there so few comments? Score so low? Is there no traffic? Or are there fewer people on the same frequency as me?
It's okay, but there are too many peers, so it's a double main story. I prefer the single main story of litigating a lawsuit and introducing a spouse.
Great book, cheers to the author! Like you👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Not bad, very readable
Personally I feel pretty good