A Good-for-Nothing Live-In Son-in-Law? No, I’m a Born-Again Villain

This novel is so touching. The protagonist was bullied so miserably before, and suddenly the bullies who once looked down on him were violently retaliated by him. It was a relief for those who read it.

The extreme narrative of blood and dignity: the dark aesthetics and moral dilemma of "The Good-for-Nothing Son-in-law" Among the cruel stories in the online world, "The Useless Son-in-law: No, He's Born a Bad Son" constructs a very impactful universe of revenge. This work pushes the themes of "son-in-law literature" and "dark revenge" to a certain extreme, presenting an unmistakable aesthetic of violence and moral subversion. From the perspective of narrative structure, the novel adopts the classic three-stage structure of "humiliation-awakening-revenge". Su Xiang's identity setting from "the abandoned son of the Su family in the capital" to "the adopted son-in-law of the Zhao family" established the ultimate status gap. The settings of the dragon-shaped jade pendant and ancient bloodline provide a mythological basis for the protagonist's reversal. The reason why this narrative mode continues to attract readers is precisely because it touches the deep desire of human beings about the "just world hypothesis" - even if the real world is full of injustice, in literary imagination, good and evil will eventually be punished. What is worth pondering is the novel's extreme description of the revenge process. Different from the traditional revenge story of "repaying grievances directly", Su Xiang's revenge has a clear sense of excess and ritual: the mother-in-law "knelt in the toilet and licked the dirt", the enemy "gnawed his own flesh and blood"... These scenes have gone beyond practical revenge and become a punishment ritual that is almost an artistic expression. The author seems to be trying to explore the dialectical relationship between dignity and violence through this extreme description - when a person's dignity is completely trampled on, will his counterattack inevitably go to the other extreme? Perhaps the most thought-provoking aspect of the novel is its redefinition of the concept of the "bad breed." The title of the book bluntly declares that the protagonist is "born bad", which actually subverts the narrative of "forced blackening" in traditional son-in-law novels. Su Xiang's cruelty is not entirely the result of external pressure, but the release of his inner essence. This setting blurs the boundaries between victims and perpetrators, forcing readers to think: When a person has absolute power, will he choose tolerance or violence? Where is the boundary between so-called "just revenge" and "natural cruelty"? From the perspective of literary value, the text of this work is full of tension and imagery. The description of "standing on a pile of corpses, crushing the bones of the enemy with his fingertips" is very impactful, creating an almost Gothic dark aesthetic. But we should be wary of the moral numbness that such extreme violence may bring - when violence is aestheticized and ritualized, will it invisibly dispel the moral warning it generates for readers? "The Good-for-Nothing Son-in-Law" is undoubtedly a work full of controversy. It is not only a literary compensation for the powerlessness in the real world, but also an in-depth exploration of the dark side of human nature. As readers, while we enjoy the pleasure of revenge, we should perhaps keep a clear mind: extreme justice in literature should never become a guide to behavior in real life. Perhaps the most noteworthy thing about this novel is not the legitimacy of revenge itself, but why such extreme revenge narratives resonate so widely in contemporary reading culture.

I really like reading the stories in this series. Su Xiang, Ming happy, Long Huayuan, Da Changchong, and many other wonderful characters are very impressive and each has its own characteristics. The writing is very good, delicate and delicate when it should be, and rough and rough when it needs to be. It keeps changing with the characters and events. With rich imagination and big brains, he has built a magical world, which is more direct, direct, and of course more incredible. I won't introduce the specific plot for fear of spoilers. [Laugh][laugh][laugh]

The opening chapter is full of tension. The protagonist, Su Xiang, is a humiliated son-in-law who is unblocked by his ancient bloodline and embarks on a path of revenge. The plot is fast-paced, refreshing, and very gripping.

The author uses extremely tense words to construct a world where the weak and the strong eat each other, and the ending of every person who has bullied him is very graphic! Even a little cruel, but this is the aesthetics of revenge - leaving no room, only despair!

Su Xiang is so humorous that I will never tire of reading it. It is a rare and good book. The characters are very three-dimensional and have a strong sense of immersion. I really like this kind of novel about being bullied and then breaking out. I will read it again. I love it!

Is the end point of revenge a liberation or a fall? The story has a tight rhythm and full of emotional catharsis, especially the structure of insult, awakening, and revenge is accurately grasped. Although the moral controversy is huge, the artistic tension is full.

This is not revenge, it is art - cruel art. The author describes Su Xiang's transformation and revenge in an almost morbid way, and every period of humiliation becomes a foreshadowing of later torture and murder. It's a suffocating pleasure to read, especially suitable for releasing emotions when you're stressed.

It's a good and touching book. I like the tone. This kind of good writing is rare and easy to read. I recommend everyone to read it. Five-star praise.

Cool writing is cool, I like it. The author's writing is good and the plot is exciting. I kept following it. The more I look at it, the more I like it, five-star recommendation