A Chat About History, Starting with the Father of the Eternal Emperor

It looks good. The research in Qin and Han Dynasties is more careful. But Ming Yingzong... The credibility of Ming Dynasty historical materials is hard to say. I suggest the author try to write about viewpoints from multiple perspectives, as well as the birthplaces of civil servants and courtiers. There was also the Song Dynasty. Their queens were deeply tied to the previous dynasty. Liu E had no foundation at the beginning, but most of the other queens represented their own interest groups. In the Song Dynasty, many princes died in infancy. In addition to cinnabar, there were political struggles. It was almost like the emperor would die if he wanted to reform, and if he wanted to make some moves, a son would die. You can imagine the complexity of the ultimate body of [feudal monarchy + capitalist bureaucracy] during the Song and Ming Dynasties. Why were there so many surrender factions in the Song and Ming Dynasties? This is because land is no longer the only high-yield means of production. The poor have no land and have the strongest attachment to the court; the bureaucrats and gentry have more land, but their business returns are higher. Senior officials of the Song Dynasty controlled "good projects" such as annual coins and smuggling trade. Capitalists have no nationality, so the middle and upper classes in the Song and Ming Dynasties were weak. This is not a purely moral issue.

The explanation uses official language. It is not biased and quotes historical materials. It adopts multi-angle analysis and has a relatively accurate grasp of the personalities of historical figures. It is one of the few good explanations in the historical circle [Like][Like]

It looks good and is really friendly to those who like Fusu (இωஇ )

This is the first time I have seen a pure system Tianmu text that is not bound to a host. In fact, the system and the host of this type of text are tools and tool systems. The loss of one tool person will not have much impact, and it is even more concise. It is all dry stuff.

The description of Fusu and Qin Shihuang is more objective than most movie-watching articles. Fusu kissed himself not entirely because of stupidity and filial piety. In short, it is highly recommended! Relatively speaking, Fusu is better than most other novels.

It's good-looking, and it talks about some unpopular historical figures. It's very interesting [sending my heart][sending my heart][sending my heart]

Beautiful! I hope the author goes well with his studies and will come back soon for updates.

Come on come on come on.

It's pretty good, not the kind of video-streaming article.

I feel that the writing is better than most Tianmu articles. There are very few unofficial histories and I have my own analysis and thinking. I don't know why the score is so low.