Survival for Two: Infinite Deconstruction and My Super-Strong Girlfriend

The survival stories in 🍅 are also excellent, and the group portraits and characters are very vivid. In a survival environment, only by being selfish can you and your companions go further. Kindness and morality are the virtues of a civilized society. The behavior of virgins in survival will harm both their companions and themselves. "Bai" is a typical example. Wang Cai chose to backstab in order to survive and meet the protagonist. Lies and backstabbing are the norm and the real situation. The existence of "White" represents the goodness of a few human beings, but being deceived by her classmates and maliciously slandered and calculated by others made her experience the reality of human nature and the universal evil that is the norm. Growth comes at a price, and she paid the price of the tragic death of the person she loved for her innocence. I personally feel that the woman "Wang" should not be evaluated in terms of good or bad. People are complex creatures. Her family is materially rich but lacks spiritual care. She has become coquettish and domineering due to the influence of the family business. She can be said to be very pure towards the people she likes, but she believes that love means possession, and if she cannot get it, she will destroy it. Therefore, she hates the protagonist because of her love. Even if she is close to death later, she will try her best and die in the hands of the protagonist. This is just a purely emotionally unsound yandere. Finally, come on, author👏Don't be a eunuch The protagonist is an extremely self-interested and ruthless businessman. Cannibalism and scheming are the norm. He is a pure black character and all relationships are for profit (the heroine was initially only approached with special abilities). Refer to Cheng Yu from the Three Kingdoms. If you don't have food, he will probably teach you how to make jerky.

I personally think this book is relatively good. First of all, let me talk about my personal feelings. I personally think this book is good because I have never read anything on this topic. Watching it for the first time, I felt that the initial experience was quite good. What this book is talking about is that the single female protagonist really perfectly interprets the theme of the single female protagonist. I think the emotional scenes are not very stiff and are still very good. But some people say that the male protagonist gave up his so-called interests for the female protagonist, but I think the emotions are mutual, and the male protagonist gave up some for the female protagonist. I personally think that the female protagonist also helps the male protagonist a lot for the male protagonist. If the female protagonist does not help the male protagonist, the male protagonist will die at the beginning. So I think the male protagonist is in love and is a licker. I personally think this aspect is not true. I can only say that if someone feels that the male protagonist has given up some interests for the female protagonist, then I can only say that you are really a refined egoist, and you only see the petty profit in front of you. I think the male protagonist's ability is not enough to give up the female protagonist because of some small interests. Otherwise, why would it be called a single female protagonist? Wouldn't this be contradictory? Some people say that the female protagonist is the male protagonist's fighting machine. I think this is not because they are all willing to consider each other. Maybe everyone has different values, but I think I still like them in this state. Then some people said that the male protagonist is very dark and selfish. Sometimes this is indeed the case. To be honest, the male protagonist is a so-called capitalist after all. So I feel that it is not impossible for him to be like this, and the author has written it in the introduction. I can only say that if he is better than the male protagonist, then he is a pure virgin. After all, the male protagonist is still a human being of flesh and blood. He will sometimes extend his olive branch out of friendship and will not kill everyone. So I personally don't think it's the so-called dark literature, but I haven't read any dark literature either. But I think the concept of dark literature is that if it touches personal interests, just kill it to the end. But I think the male protagonist has his own considerations and thoughts. He has his own point of view, what is right, what is wrong, what is maximizing interests, and he has his own set of reasoning. Some people say that the male protagonist is very dark, but I think it still depends on personal values. I think the male protagonist is not purely evil, he can only be considered a businessman or a capitalist character. The above are all personal judgments I made after reading some comments, so this is my personal subjective thinking, not objective facts, because I think everyone cannot achieve objective facts, so I just say it casually, but I personally think that the low scores given by some people are not tenable. Although I may have made a lot of mistakes, please forgive me. Talking about my reading, I feel that the author has written quite a few books, and it can be seen that his writing skills are quite good. But sometimes I feel it's a bit disconnected, or a bit dramatic. I personally prefer the more realistic book in this book, although sometimes it can be more magical. I think the author is relatively well-researched in certain aspects, and I am also more interested in psychological things. The author can flexibly use the aspects he is interested in to add to his book, which I think is a big highlight. However, the author can also see from the side that he has a strong subjective consciousness and likes to express his personal opinions, which makes readers feel tired and boring. I mean those readers who don't agree with the author's point of view. Readers like me who agree with the author's point of view are acceptable, but those who don't like it may not necessarily be able to accept it. If you want to watch a single female protagonist, and there is relatively pure love between men and women. Moreover, the male protagonist is more self-interested. Maybe I think this is a group portrait article, which is more focused on the team, so it describes a lot of supporting characters. Then everyone has their own character traits, some are the Virgin, Justice, or have all kinds of absurd and bizarre diseases. I also think this can show the diversity of people, but it is not rigid, and it looks boring and boring as the dramatic characters. I feel that overall it's pretty good. I highly recommend this book. The author's writing style is pretty good, neither bad nor strong. You can give it a read. Moreover, the author has updated many more chapters, which I think is pretty good. I hope the author will work hard and not let some unwarranted negative comments disturb his writing mood. Although some of the comments may be true, I think I can still accept them.

The male protagonist is well portrayed, his scheming is very deep, but there are also precious things, as well as plot calculations. They are all very well written. The female protagonist is also in line with my own dreams. It is indeed impressive, but for some reason, after reading it, I can feel a little distressed and regretful. She is the one who no one can compare with. Xin, the only loneliness left in the world is still the caution and fragility behind the calculation of the world. Many times, too much calculation is because you have been hurt too much, so you will protect yourself. The author has written the charm of this, and I feel that the author also understands it. So it's very well written.

First let me explain, it is very well written, the text is concise, the logic is clear, and the story flows smoothly. The male protagonist is an absolute egoist and only sees interests and values ​​and the loyal dog female protagonist. I believe there will be some people who like this type of book very much.

It's a good book. I'm used to industrial saccharine and it's still very good to eat some dishes mixed with sugar. But the title of the book must be changed later. It must be more than this first copy. Maybe one day the author will suddenly have a good idea and come up with a good title.

好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好好

The subject matter is very good. The external brain is not very intuitive at the moment. The author probably likes knives. Run Thunder Knife. The writing is nice, but the author set the force value of the fist too high. The function of the protagonist's brain is not reflected at all, it is basically a tumor. There is no sense of cooperation. The suggestion is to lower the force value of the fist, not too high, just above the middle level, or lower it, just be stronger than the protagonist. Otherwise, the protagonist is really dispensable.

@Guiyi Jiang Shan sneered: "Luo Yonghao, let me ask you, if you were to die and you turned around and found that those who had helped you slapped your outstretched hands away, would you protect them?" This sentence was so awkward that I didn't even understand what it meant. Do you want to express If you were to die and you looked back and found that the people you had helped swatted your outstretched hand away, would you protect them?

Only three pictures a day, too slow, hurry up, update quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly, quickly. (´°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥ω°̥̥̥̥̥̥̥̥｀)

I think it would be nice to have a code name. After all, everyone else is calling Jiang Shan Jiang Shan, which is weird. For example, Jiang Shan can be called "Jiang is not in the mountain", and He Liu'er is called "River is in Jiangshan". Also, didn't the author say that the villain wouldn't survive more than two chapters? Could it be that Wang Cai is the villain or mini-boss in the early stages of the book? The author loves to tell stories and is very philosophical [like]