Drunk Beneath the Mountains

It possesses the resounding scholarly spirit of the Northern Song Dynasty, and the unique, clashing swords and galloping horses of the martial world—an era where romance and passion coexist, where poetry and swords dance side by side, leaps vividly from the page. Brothers who haven't finished reading, please don't criticize prematurely; I read the whole book, and it's truly captivating.

It contains both unofficial and official historical accounts, with detailed and rich character portrayals that immerse the reader in the era of war and conquest, allowing them to subtly alter the course of history through their own efforts. I haven't seen the ending yet, so I'll comment after I finish reading!

The author truly possesses strong writing skills and writes well, especially excelling at depicting war scenes. Personally, I believe it rivals masterpieces like "Joy of Life" and "Ever Night."

Well, the characters are well-developed, the plot is clear, and it's a pretty good historical fiction book. Personally, I don't really like such a pretentious protagonist; he's too confident and arrogant. That's fine, but the protagonist's character isn't well-rounded or fleshed out enough. This constant pretentiousness actually alienates many readers. When reading novels, I think many people want a balance of suspense, mystery, sadness, emotion, warmth, lightness, and joy.

Although this book is well-written, very realistic and socially conscious, I still don't like it, yet I can't deny that it's indeed a good book. Regardless of history, the details in the book always move me; the character portrayals are very delicate. The protagonist is despised by almost everyone, beaten down by life's hardships, yet he still lives in that world, gaining much and losing much as well. ... The book is very good; I don't like it, but like a cigarette, I can't quit.

It's much better than those mindless, feel-good novels; I don't know why the rating is so low.

It's well-written, but I have a question. Why did the protagonist carry a knife when he ran away? Was he stealing someone's sacred artifact because he was tired of living and looking for excitement? Why didn't he hide the knife properly when he got home? Why did Honglian fight with the constables?

I haven't finished reading it, but it's pretty good; it reminds me a bit of reading "My Heroic Husband." However, for some reason, I don't really like the inclusion of Liangshan characters in the novel.

Fantastic, very well written. 99 points. (A bit too many women.)

What makes this book even more captivating are the chapters dedicated to the ordinary characters, whether it's their inner monologues or their outward expressions.