Genshin Impact: Void Emanator, Devouring Furina from the Start

Xia Ye and Navia were sent to Liyue as the followers of Funina Water God. Naturally, they had to find Zhongli himself and the immortals who were the followers of the Rock God. There were no followers of the Rock God among the Seven Stars of Liyue. They were not sent by Villette to discuss government affairs, so why did they want to meet Liyue Qixing? Let me ask directly: Which of you among the Seven Stars of Liyue is Morax's dependent? If Liyue Qixing wants to discuss issues, please send a representative to Fontaine to find Navilette. We are not responsible for discussing issues with you here.

With your ability to swallow emotions, what are you afraid of? Go swallow the devil's shadow body. If Xianzhou knew that you could solve the devil's shadow body, he wouldn't be able to offer you as a treasure.

Am I the only one who thinks the protagonist is suitable for a life of greed? You see, the author also said that the protagonist just keeps getting stronger. Isn't this quite consistent with the greedy destiny?

Where did it come from that nothingness is a waste? Do you think she is in ruins after being sent to the Underworld?

Tai Chi and Bashui are gone. When it comes to Liyue, it's all water.

There are too many repetitive descriptions

About nothingness—— There have been more discussions on the topic of nothingness recently, and some of the statements may even cause misunderstandings among passers-by. Some friends are confused as to why no one writes about Doctor Chaos when writing about nothingness. Here is a unified explanation of my personal views. In fact, as long as those who have played the game, no one will say that nothingness is a pendulum or the same as a pendulum. After all, the popularity of Underworld was so high at the beginning, and the things of Doctor Chaos have such a high sense of existence in simulating the universe. No one denies the existence of these two. However, for the vast majority of people who stray into the path of nothingness, they will lose their emotional memories and eventually lose all meaning after being shrouded in the shadow of nothingness. Note that what I say here is the vast majority, not all. The path of nothingness can even be said to be the freest path, because as long as you have the ability to resist, you can have fun on the path of nothingness. In order to fight against nothingness, I am crazy about having fun. Is this logical and reasonable? But, is this people's first impression of nothingness? Since a novel is titled "Nihility", of course at least the first expression and core content must conform to the public's impression. Otherwise, if your title is "Nihility" and the content is all about joy, do you think most people will think it is cheating? I came in with the word "nihility" in mind, but you told me that you were actually happy? For another example, if the title of my book is Happy, but the main character's style is that of a mourning actor or an ascetic, and the mourning actor is also a happy faction, right, but you feel that after reading the word "happy", what you end up reading is a mourning actor and the protagonist is an ascetic. Let me ask you, are you surprised, are you surprised, are you happy? Nothingness is the same. Chaos Doctor Ditto. You can have happiness, you can have other things in life, and the protagonist certainly has his own special characteristics, but you have to prioritize them. Your first performance must still correspond to the title of the book and the public impression. If the public impression is that nothingness is generally relatively ostentatious, then your first performance must be relatively ostentatious, unless the title of your book clearly states that you are a rebel against nothingness. This is probably the reason why most authors write about the first expression of nothingness, first to satisfy the public's impression, and then to discuss the particularity of the protagonist. The same goes for this book. I didn't say that nothingness means it's just a constant display. If it was a constant display, then why is the main plot in the introduction still about Fufu contacting the various countries to help the protagonist come out? I hope friends passing by will not be misled by some discussions. By the way, I think Chaos Doctors should be brought into happiness by Ahara, because in those strange object texts, what they do is so fun, even though they don't feel happy themselves, haha.

I keep saying that the protagonist is not in control of his destiny, but the situation where the protagonist is almost self-destructed has always existed. I think it would be good to let the protagonist reach the point of ruin, but looking at the content, the protagonist seems to just live, no matter whether he is comfortable or not, no matter whether he is comfortable or not, there is no idea of enjoyment, and the final outcome of Teyvat is very likely to be destroyed, and the protagonist does not even need to use too much force to increase his strength. To sum up, the protagonist is also a person who is controlled by his destiny. It is better to be happy and have a free destiny.

The protagonist of the system should have the closing time on the timeline. There is only the present, no past and future, right? Why is there a situation where the world has changed before the protagonist can go back and do something? Are you not saying that as long as you have the means, you can bring the protagonist's past and future to the present?

Will other life paths be awakened in the future to balance the nothingness? Otherwise, the protagonist will always be in bad shape and there will be nothing to watch. Seeing the bad protagonist will give you a headache.