Turning the Tables in a World Where Every Girl Hates Me!

I even tipped for this book review. First of all, this book is a disappointing one. It had a better way of developing the story, but firstly, the author abandoned Mitsu and chose Hayakawa too quickly and abruptly; secondly, Hayakawa, as the main female lead, received too much attention and resources, to the point that it was written as a single-female-lead template. It's clear that the author was trying to please the readers. The two points mentioned above seem like they could attract fans, but there's a book on Qidian that goes against both of these approaches and ultimately succeeded: *The Love Game of Crow*. It made the villainous woman who initially hurt the male lead the main heroine, and relegated a character with higher popularity in the early stages to a secondary role. First, abandoning beauty is irresponsible towards one's own character development. If the character's design is flawed, then find a way to fix it. Constantly avoiding or not completely abandoning the heroine only makes the reader feel uncomfortable. Second, promoting the less-than-ideal Hayakawa is a major taboo in all harem works. The reason is that this character will eventually stand out, and harems are just a kind of obsession. For a character with mediocre basic qualities to rise to the top, the author has to constantly forcefully enhance her, for example, by having her appear in almost every chapter. The author even pre-determines the male lead and his parents, simply because the character is popular in the early stages. This might gain support from readers who like the character, but what's the cost? Isn't this a harem? Shouldn't a harem be a diverse and vibrant one? If, during your favorite character's turn, Hayakawa is constantly mentioned, would you like it? Hayakawa's character is completely overhyped and ruined; she's an irresponsible and self-indulgent product of the author's imagination. If you truly liked this character, she should have been a single-heroine from the start. There's a saying, "It's not scarcity that's the problem, but inequality." The most off-putting thing about harem novels is having multiple female leads and only one female lead. Of course, those who finished reading and even gave rewards are people who like the character. However, I think Hayakawa is a perfect heroine, but definitely not a qualified main heroine. Therefore, based on my experience with this book, having a high-popularity character rise to the top early on directly prevents the emergence of high-popularity characters later in the story and the reversal of fortunes for low-popularity characters in the early stages. That's why Koiyuu Miki became the most popular character, while Miki in this book is just a supporting character. Also, it's really a pity that this book has the potential to become a masterpiece, especially since it started serialization in 2021, which is a relatively good time. The author is too unpredictable and a bit self-indulgent.

Let's analyze the plot. @{"Reader_id":"23433907","reader_name":""}